Jump to content

Recommended Posts

College Ward Cllrs Helen Hayes and Andy Simmons are very aware of this. Thames Water have not been very forthcoming over when the water supply is likely to be restored. Helen has notified Council Officers about the situation, particularly as vulnerable, elderly and disabled residents may have difficulty in accessing the bottled water and standpipe.

Renata

Local Authorities have a set procedure to respond to level 3 and level 4 warm weather alerts. It would be worth trying to contact Sarah McClinton - Southwark Social Services as she can issue instructions to social workers to look up vulnerable adults in the area who may need additional help in accessing water and water supplies. Failing her - try Ray Boyce.

I've only just picked this up after spending the night in hospital.

I'll try and find out when it will be repaired what TW are doing to tell affected people.


I've asked that the next Dulwich Community Council, which sadly isnt until September, thaT thames Water be invited to explain what is going on generally and why they've failed to responded properly to this and other issues.

  • 2 months later...
Went out at 0945 and it was slightly bubbling. Came back at 1530 and it was much worse and no sign of workmen. They don't need permission to dig for this type of work so they just deal with the immediate problem- then another leak may appear so they dig again etc. so I have been reliably informed
It's always in pretty much the same spot there. Was quite substantial when I came back on the school run. Can drivers please be aware of the water too. So many purposely (yes, purposely) drive through it causing massive splashes when people are walking out of LL estate. This is illegal and totally uncalled for, there is plenty of space in the road there to not hit the surface water.

GinaG3 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's always in pretty much the same spot there.

> Was quite substantial when I came back on the

> school run. Can drivers please be aware of the

> water too. So many purposely (yes, purposely)

> drive through it causing massive splashes when

> people are walking out of LL estate. This is

> illegal and totally uncalled for, there is plenty

> of space in the road there to not hit the surface

> water.


I got splashed at the bus stop opposite Overhill Road on Thursday thanks to a speeding car. It's also formed a large puddle on LL outside the estate which normally happens after heavy rainfall with rain and a stream of water going into a drain outside Byron Court.

Were the blokes standing round actual workmen or just passers by?


I walked past there 4 times on saturday, the first about 10:15am, saw a red van of Clancy Docwra parked there. Driver having a nap inside. Walked past again about 11:45, driver awake now, but still sitting inside his car.


Walked past again around 15:30, the van was now parked facing the opposite direction, driver inside.I got the impression he probably went for lunch and came back to sit in his van possibly charging the council per hour he is sat there.


Temporary lights causing all manor of traffic turned on yesterday (monday) but so far I havent seen any actual work being done, considering the road started leaking around wednesday/thursday last week, you wonder what they are doing.

Were the blokes standing round actual workmen or just passers by?


Well, definitely not passers-by (all in overalls, boots, high-vis jackets etc) but also not doing any actual work when I went past. Sounds from what Penguin38 says that they got going a bit later in the evening. It was more the comical shaking of heads that was going on - like a bad sitcom.

According to Thames' website, the problem has now disappeared. There's a report of a leak on Overhill, and they're sending a technician.


According to public.londonworks.gov.uk, there's a "Main Clamp 6 to 12" Cway in Carriageway" which'll be going on till Friday. Presumably that's what the current round of single-lane action is about. Potentially more interesting is the expedition to "Investigate and repair leak on 42" main" up Fireman's Alley, which is scheduled to go on till the Friday after, thrillingly close to the telephone exchange.


Given all these pipes were tediously upgraded well within living memory, expressly to reduce leaks and at our considerable expense, I have asked Thames the relevant question. I'm sure a helpfully constructive reply is on its way.

At last nights Dulwich Community Council we had three Thames Water officials talking about the previous Underhill/Lordship Lane burst pipe and Herne Hill.


They explained that 12 different mains pipes are in the vacinity of Underhill/Lordship Lane junction. That the burst earlier this year was of a 4" mains. But due to the very hilly nature when they reduced the pressure to keep water available for residents but reduce the damage of the gushing water that water unhill and top floor flats went of.


This latest burst is apparently a 6" mains.


They exlained that the recent (last 12 months) has seen a doubling in burst main with the cold winter, hot summer, LOTS of rain. This combination means lots of earth movement and pipes bursting.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I completely agree with you . Its as if they have their foot in the door and are just pushing and pushing. It's ridiculous. It's not the right space. they clearly do not give any regard to the environment or they would move it.  
    • There's a great badminton club at the Harris girls academy. It runs Friday from 5.30 to 6.45. for more experienced players, they have sessions on Wednesday and Friday, too but that's subject to skill levels 
    • There seem to be all sorts of blocks for this event being mounted on the Common, one is that it was 'designed especially' for the current site, though the organisers seem to have had absolutely no problem rejigging their plans to the original site footprint to expand the event to what we had last year- which I think really imposed on a large part of the park and spoilt the feel. I would suggest pressing very hard for relocation to the Common ( also closer to transport links). There must be a way, surely? If not, then wholesale relocation to a more suitable venue. I just do not think the park should be subjected to a festival-goer footfall of 60,000 plus over the summer.
    • I absolutely will. Fed up of property developments that are funded from offshore investors and price out local people. Fed up of the demise of social rents and the growing crisis of families in bed and breakfast. Fed up of young people being unable to save deposits, start families and generally have the same security of tenure that previous generations had. So yes, I will drill down into the financing, affordability, where the properties aer being advertised for sale, and how many are genuinely for social rent. Otherwise, no opposition to redeveloping that site in that way. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...