Jump to content

Recommended Posts

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The older women you used to fantasise about are of

> equal age, or, scarily, slightly younger than you.


A couple of years ago I was on a stag weekend with a bunch of guys who were mainly in their late 30s. One of them repeatedly used the phrase "MILF" over the weekend to describe good looking women only slightly older than himself. I think he was in denial. Or maybe just a bit thick.

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> A couple of years ago I was on a stag weekend with

> a bunch of guys who were mainly in their late 30s.

> One of them repeatedly used the phrase "MILF" over

> the weekend to describe good looking women only

> slightly older than himself. I think he was in

> denial. Or maybe just a bit thick.


Yeahbut, surely a MILF is a MILF regardless of the age of the objectifying penis-wielder. That is to say, a woman who is a mother and also lucky enough to be included on said idiot's imaginary "would" list, is de facto a MILF in that she is:

a) a mother

b) someone he would like to f***.


She doesn't actually have to be old enough to *be* the knuckle-dragging fool's mother to qualify for the label. I mean, when considering the objectifying categorisation of attractive women we should be clear in our understanding.


Further, an issue may arise in identifying whether the appraised sexual object is indeed a mother, or merely a women of a certain age (shall we say 30-35 and upwards?) who also happens to satisfy the sexual check list of the appraiser. I guess at this point she is merely a WILF. It may be interesting to consider why the attainment of motherhood is, however, deemed the important signifier rather than the mere fact of her age.


Further, if the objectifier is of a similar age to the object we should ask, why would this man draw attention to the age of the woman (mother or not) at all? I think we should consider that by viewing his sexual attraction to a person his own age as worthy of comment, the man in question is tacitly confirming that his libido is usually to be found wallowing around secondary schools at going home time. In short, he's probably a paedo and/or harbours unresolved oedipal fantasies. Did you raise this on the stag do, Jeremy? I'd be interested to hear how it went.

Depends if you take the literal meaning (a woman who is a mother), the true spirit (mother of someone in your own age group), or the modern usage (simply an older woman).


Any of these would be rather moronic, but I'm assuming he meant the third... which ties in with KK's point... there does indeed reach a point where "older woman" fantasies would seem somewhat flawed.

You find yourself working with your old boss's son, who was a new baby when you first started work and is now at university.


That happened to me last summer - was quite odd. I knew really I was approaching 40 but being confronted with someone who was as old as my work life really drove it home.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Who was Diana Rayworth, when 'resting from acting'. Her successful career was very sadly cut short following a devastating accident. 
    • thanks Jenijenjen and all - yes, i remember walking or taking the bus from the elephant (where i was working) to Camberwell to get there.  I think Tim - who's still at Franklin's -  was there in those days, and the woman who ran the cafe!  Other food places that i remember fondly are the ones in Neal's Yard (with the Hunkin sculpture that you could put a coin in ) and the basement lunch place at the Tottenham Court Road junction with Hanway Street... 
    • Did you try the emergency number posted above? It mentions lift breakdowns over the festive period outside the advertised  times. Hope you got it sorted x
    • People working in shops should not be "attempting to do the bill in their head." Nor if questioned should they be  trying to "get to an agreeable number." They should be actually (not trying to) getting to the correct number. I'm afraid in many cases it is clearly more than incorrect arithmetic. One New Year's Eve in a restaurant (not in East Dulwich but quite near it) two of us were charged for thirty poppadoms. We were quite merry when the bill came, but not so merry as to not notice something amiss. Unfortunately we have had similar things happen in a well established East Dulwich restaurant we no longer use. There is also a shop in East Dulwich which is open late at night. It used not to display prices on its goods (that may have changed). On querying the bill, we several times found a mistake had been made. Once we were charged twice for the same goods. There is a limit to how many times you can accept a "mistake".  There is also a limit to how many times you can accept the "friendly" sweet talking after it.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...