Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I do think, on balance, things have improved but it's still a pretty cramped bottlenexk in the new office isn't it, epsecially immediately outside.

I hope that after the cafe is refurbed an entrance with sensors is retained there.


Also surprised there was no Windsor Walk entrance done, I assumed for ages that's what all the work there was about, lost opportunity I reckon.


But still.....better....


as for the look, I was musing this morning that it has broken up the elegance of the old view of the station from the platform, but you can't have your cake and eat it. All told I don't mind the aesthetic, especially given the eyesore that is KCH behind it.



Poor Johnny, gone....gone...!!!

http://farm1.staticflickr.com/162/367987192_13deaaa57c.jpg

ye olde lampes, on Flickr

  • 1 month later...

The official opening took place earlier this week.

It cost ?6.2M to add those walkways and lifts to Denmark Hill station under the governments Access for All funding stream.

I'm amazed so much was spent to provide so little of such poor design with no boost to capacity at the station.


What do other think?

Have you actually read the thread James?!


Poorly designed and way too small is the general opinion I believe. It seems to have cost a fortune for very little benefit. The flow of traffic through the new gates is sometimes even worse than through the old door (at peak times), particularly as they insist on having the in/out gates alternately, rather than a section in and a section out - which means that people get in each other's way as they try to change direction. The departure boards are in the wrong place - they should be above the gates so a quick glance up tells you which platform for your train/if it's on time or you've missed it. Off to the side causes even more dithering in front of the gates.


Anyone know what is happening to the old entrance? Will it be reopened? I got stuck in the upward flow of people coming off the train I wanted to catch the other day.

Agreed it's horrendous, and agreed James - read the thread.


I hate the triple dog leg to get to the front of a London train. Zero expanded capacity. Temporaary tin shack architecture.

Shit ticketing options, no cash machines, no waiting space - dreadful.


As I've said, why didn't they do similar to the new West Hampstead thameslink station, which is an identical set up (4 tracks in a trench, 1 island and 2 side platforms) - and works great.

What it needs is the screens moving from being right by a ticket machine - everyone bunches up.


Ideally it needs the ticketing machine moved, perhaps across to be nearer the offices. It also needs another ticketing machine - perhaps against the windows off the pavement.


Its a poor design, I had hoped they would keep the old ticket office as a way in/out. At least if it was a way out, you wouldn't have the mad congestion now of people coming in and out, bunching round the screens and queuing for the ticket machine.

?6.2m is unbelievable.


At least half the time during the construction period nobody was working on it.


Truly awful. I reckon you could have gone to Imperial College, asked some Engineering undergraduates to do it for ?0.62m and they would have done a better job in less time.


Or why not just ship in some proper Engineers from Germany (company like Hochtief), for whom this is bread-and-butter stuff. Bet they could have done it for far less than ?6.2m and you could guarantee there would be people working on it solidly 8 hours a day, 7 days a week.

Agreed. I don't like being a moaning Minnie, but that amount of money and the time it took is shaming, even more so when the badly-designed result is what we got.


James (or anyone else that can help) - what about all the muck, litter etc that's now been exposed on the slopes? Can the railway owners or the franchise operators clean this up? It's a right mess and just encourages others to add to it.

I understand that it was originally a ?4.18 million project at Denmark Hill, so a one year overrun and an additional 2 million pounds. In my opinion, as I have said before, someone should be held responsible for such mismanagement.

Hi Nigello, philosophie,

I've asked the lead manager at Southwark why we don't use section 215 of the Town & Counrety Planning Act 190 to serve an 'untidy land notice' onyjhr landowner. If they then fail to clean it up the council can clean it up under section 219 of that act and sned the bill to the landowner.

I'm awaiting council officials to tell me whether they'll do this or whether the suggestion will be enoguh to get Network Rail to act.

Can you also ask TFL about ticketing? It's dismal - and I've seen signs now that weekly travelcards will no longer be on paper, so that's another massive tranche moving to Oyster. And the guy in the booth is a tosser.


A free cash machine might be handy too.


And what is happening with the original entrance?

I am appalled and shocked that there is to be no exit onto Windsor Walk (based on what I'm garnering from this thread and a cursory check on the designs), especially as several sections of wall have been knocked through on this side over the extensive period of works. While it may only shave a (often crucial) minute or three off my and others' arrival onto the platform, it beggars belief that it was not considered as a curative measure for the heavy flow in and out of the main exit. It's not too late for this to be considered, surely? It's a no-brainer, with the newly constructed walkways centimetres away from this permieter wall. Can anyone advise/petition?


I also echo sentiments on project over-run and cost of works.

  • 1 month later...
The last two days of ticket checking at Denmark Hill - the gates have been closed - really highlights the ridiculous design of the station. The bottlenecking at the gates when people have to check their tickets on the reader means that queues are snaking back to the stairs from platform level. There is no way that they can have this happen every day so the fare dodgers will continue to travel without tickets for the 28 days a month they can get away with it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • What was he doing on the stage at Glastonbury? Or on the stage at the other concert in Finsbury Park? Grinning like a Cheshire cat whilst pissed and stoned 20 somethings on the promise of free internet sung-- Oh Jeremy Corbyn---  What were his policies for Northern mining towns with no jobs or infrastructure? Free Internet and university places for youngsters. What were his other manifesto pledges? Why all the ambiguity over Brexit?  I didn't like Thatcher, Blair or May or Tony but I respected them as politicians because they stood by what they believed in. I respect all politicians across the board that stick to their principles. Corbyn didn't and its why he got  annihilated at the polls. A socialist, anti imperialist and anti capitalist that said he voted for an imperialist and pro capitalist cabal. He refused to say how he'd vote over and over again until the last knockings. He did so to appease the Islington elite and middle class students he was courting. The same people that were screaming that Brexit was racist. At the same time the EU were holding black and Asian immigrants in refugee camps overseas but not a word on that! Corbyn created and courted a student union protest movement that screamed at and shouted down anyone not on the left . They claimed Starmer and the centre right of labour were tories. He didn't get elected  because he, his movement and policies were unelectable, twice. He turned out not to have the convictions of his politics and died on his own sword.    Reform won't win an election. All the idiots that voted for them to keep out Labour actually enabled Labour. They'll be back voting tory next time.    Farage wouldn't be able to make his millions if he was in power. He's a very devious shyster but I very much doubt he'd actually want the responsibility that governance requires.
    • The purge of hard left members that were part of Corbyn's, Mcdonnel's and Lansmans momentum that purged the party of right wing and centrist members. That's politics. It's what Blair did to win, its what Starmer had to do to win. This country doesn't vote in extreme left or right governments. That's partly why Corbyn lost  We're pretty much a centrist bunch.  It doesn't make it false either. It's an opinion based on the voting patterns, demography and statistics. Can you explain then why former mining constituencies that despise the tories voted for them or abstained rather than vote for Corbyns Labour?  What is the truth then? But he never got elected!!! Why? He should have been binned off there and then. Why he was allowed to hang about is an outrage. I hold him party responsible for the shit show that we've had to endure since. 
    • Depends on what the Barista says doesnt it? There was no physical confrontation with the driver, OP thinks she is being targetted when she isnt. These guys work min wage under strict schedules so give them a break unless they damage your stuff
    • CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...