Jump to content

New entrance to Denmark Hill station


Recommended Posts

Having them closed is good for evaders, but also for accurate metrics about station usage! Only then will Southeastern/TfL/whoever spend money on improvements, or have more trains stop (several Victoria trains pass through at around 8:05-10am during a gap in service).


Any news on the paint job of the stairs? What is the final plan there, including the original entrance?


I read that in 2014, station management will pass from Southeastern to the new Thameslink franchise company. Going by their work at West Hampstead Thameslink (which I've mentioned on here as an almost identical station format) - it can only be a good thing. They're seemingly more generous on ticket machines (Oyster!) too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd be happy personally to pay some unemployed local youths to knock a hole in the Windsor Terrace wall and construct some steps up to the walkway. I assume an electrician could easily hook up an Oyster reader.


Lack of entrance there costs me at least 6 minutes per day, 250 days per year. That's 25 hours per year. Can see myself doing this for at least another 5 years.


= 125 hours. I value my leisure time at about ?40 per hour.


125 * 40 = ?5,000


I am officially putting this out to tender...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

cle Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Can you also ask TFL about ticketing? It's dismal

> - and I've seen signs now that weekly travelcards

> will no longer be on paper, so that's another

> massive tranche moving to Oyster. And the guy in

> the booth is a tosser.



Not made clear is that period travelcards can still be sold on paper from Denmark Hill as the station is managed by Southeastern railway. It's only from London Overground managed stations that the changes were made to Oyster only.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please have a read of this press release from Network Rail http://www.networkrailmediacentre.co.uk/News-Releases/Improvements-at-Denmark-Hill-station-unveiled-by-transport-minister-1e70.aspx


We actually have ?...a much improved station which will provide passengers with a much better experience as they use the railway. There is better access, better information and better facilities, all of which have made a huge difference to the quality of the station."


It seems we have also got ... "better passenger waiting areas and new retail facilities including a coffee shop. Accessible toilets have also been provided within the new station building."


The station was opened by Norman Baker MP, Fiona Taylor (Network Rail?s route managing director for Kent) and Charles Horton (Managing Director of Southeastern.)


I'm going to tweet @networkrailPR and make them aware of the issues being raised on this thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've found a contact to access about this from Southeastern.


I'm also chasing planning enforcement to ensure the original footbridge and staircases are reopened ASAP.


It is appalling that so much public money could be wasted and the job not even finished and with no regard of any kind to the travelling public utility at this station.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bic Basher Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> cle Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Can you also ask TFL about ticketing? It's

> dismal

> > - and I've seen signs now that weekly

> travelcards

> > will no longer be on paper, so that's another

> > massive tranche moving to Oyster. And the guy

> in

> > the booth is a tosser.

>

>

> Not made clear is that period travelcards can

> still be sold on paper from Denmark Hill as the

> station is managed by Southeastern railway. It's

> only from London Overground managed stations that

> the changes were made to Oyster only.


You need a photocard still - obselete. And they've also stopped doing weekly paper Travelcards, so again not so useful.


The only role the ticket office staff have these days is to tell people to use the machine as they don't do Oyster. Useless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Opening the old footbridge and stairs will make some difference to getting down to the platform once you're through gates. It can get pretty busy if a train has just come in and people are on their way up to the exit. I'm presuming there are no plans for more gates in the old entrance? Unless that happens, there is going to be a constant bottle neck in the new entrance at peak times. Great job network rail!...not...
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is amazing that they've replaced the old constraint of narrow footbridge with a narrow much longer footbridge and the narrow single doorway with ticket barriers.

The capacity is the same after ? millions spent.


Need someone to click those plastic tags holding the barriers over the revamped old footbridge and stair entrances.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You represent us all democratically! Go forth and clip...


Seriously though, why the new entrance doesn't connect with the new footbridge (on both sides) to help distribute traffic and lessen many people's walks is a complete joke.


James - can you petition for the final scope to be released so that we can make requests for works to amend and improve further? It's such a busy station these days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

cle Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Bic Basher Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > cle Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > Can you also ask TFL about ticketing? It's

> > dismal

> > > - and I've seen signs now that weekly

> > travelcards

> > > will no longer be on paper, so that's another

> > > massive tranche moving to Oyster. And the guy

> > in

> > > the booth is a tosser.

> >

> >

> > Not made clear is that period travelcards can

> > still be sold on paper from Denmark Hill as the

> > station is managed by Southeastern railway.

> It's

> > only from London Overground managed stations

> that

> > the changes were made to Oyster only.

>

> You need a photocard still - obselete. And they've

> also stopped doing weekly paper Travelcards, so

> again not so useful.

>

> The only role the ticket office staff have these

> days is to tell people to use the machine as they

> don't do Oyster. Useless.


Photocards were re-introduced for weekly paper travelcards requested by the train companies. The other excuse regarding weekly paper travelcards is poor customer service from Southeastern and you should make a complaint to their customer services regarding the 'service' from Denmark Hill's ticket office if they continue to refuse to sell you a weekly paper travelcard. Peckham Rye and East Dulwich still sell weekly travelcards on paper with a photocard.


National Rail stations except for London Overground managed ones only sell weekly travelcards on Oyster via the machines. (Bar a minimum of NR stations, such as Wimbledon, East Croydon, Ealing Broadway and Richmond).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Glad but also sad to see this debate I started raging on - I've posted here about the latest blot on the station. Only a fence, I know, but just another example of poor design and consideration of the environment of the station: http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?5,1210050


I am sure local stations are getting busier and busier but Denmark Hill seems busier than ever and the design has not provided the additional space or flow required to deal with a demand which is large, particularly with high employment at the local hospitals and teaching colleges.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BicBasher - but I don't have a photocard. I have an Oyster card like most Londoners.


One time when the queue was ridiculous, my train was imminent and the ticket man was twiddling his thumbs - he wouldn't sell me a weekly because of the photocard issue. So I skipped it and bought one in Victoria, having talked my way out of the barriers there.


They are completely archaic within the TfL area. Ticket offices should be uniform within Tfl zones, regardless of TOC and station management, fundamentally they should offer Oyster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi El Pipe,

They have no plans and ward councillors didnt suggest it.


Hi cle,

No further Oyster provision planned. Effectively they've reproduced what was there before but a much longer walk to stair ot platforms and lifts for those that need them.

No cashmachine.

Yes, they are talking aobut having a coffee shop back again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi James, I'm assuming there will be ticket barriers or 'touch ins' at the old/new entrance? Seems like an obvious thing I know but the rest has been such a monumental cock up it wouldn't surprise me if there wasn't....the final nail in the coffin! I have spoken to a couple of the staff there who have also fed back and complained but they have said it's falling on deaf ears and no-one's interested. What a terrible waste of money...
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Okay Earl, of those 'consulted' how many voices were in favour of the junction and how many against? Were there more responses in favour or more against? This local junction change is being driven by Southwark Labour Councillors- not as you assert by Central Govt. Also, if consultations are so irrelevant as indicators of meaningful local support in the way you seem to imply, why do organisations like Southwark Cyclists constantly ask their members to respond to all and any consultation on LTN's and CPZ's?  
    • You could apply the same argument to any kind of penalty as an effective deterrent.  Better than doing nothing. 
    • Check the link I provided above. It’s gives a very full account of where the push for LTNs came from, (in brief, central government). The consultation did not show that the majority of local residents were against the LTN. Not for the first time, you’ve confused a ‘consultation’ with a ‘referendum’. The outcome of local elections (which many opposed to LTNs excitedly promoted as a referendum on the scheme), suggested they are actually quite popular. All the polling on LTNs generally, also shows majority support across London.
    • Rockets said: "Perhaps you should be asking who is lobbying the council to close the junction or parts of it or why the council is happy to waste so much of our money on it - who are they representing as even their own consultation demonstrated they did not have support from the local community for the measures? The results showed the majority of local residents were against the measure...but they are going ahead with them anyway" This.   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...