Jump to content

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, jim_the_chin said:

“East Dulwich has always been an upwardly mobile sort of place,”

No it hasn't!  It was nothing like this when I first moved here in 1992 (into a 2 bed flat bought for £63k).  The area was full of salt of the earth, sarf London pensioners.  Slow Horses' Lamb would have been more at home here than Amanda back in the '90s.  People do write such toss about their neighbourhoods.

3 hours ago, jim_the_chin said:

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Agree 5

Cathy Adams' article serves as a fascinating case study in modern middle class delusion where the true joys of life in Dulwich are boiled down to oat milk flat whites, designer buggies, and a performative obsession with whatever brand is currently deemed acceptable by the local mum mafia. How inspiring.

What’s truly great about Dulwich isn’t the ability to accessorise one’s life with the right labels; it’s the rare gift of having a proper community, a peaceful refuge from the chaos of London, actual greenery, and a place where kids can grow up in a safe, healthy environment rather than learning the fine art of dodging traffic fumes. We have excellent schools, homes that aren’t glorified shoeboxes, and, perhaps most importantly, people who appreciate these things without feeling the need to turn their existence into an ongoing lifestyle ad.

But sure, let’s pretend the real magic of living here is found in a £6 loaf of artisan sourdough and an overpriced gym membership. Because nothing screams "good life" like reducing everything to a checklist of material must-haves.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Agree 6
1 hour ago, Paitro said:

Cathy Adams' article serves as a fascinating case study in modern middle class delusion where the true joys of life in Dulwich are boiled down to oat milk flat whites, designer buggies, and a performative obsession with whatever brand is currently deemed acceptable by the local mum mafia. How inspiring.

What’s truly great about Dulwich isn’t the ability to accessorise one’s life with the right labels; it’s the rare gift of having a proper community, a peaceful refuge from the chaos of London, actual greenery, and a place where kids can grow up in a safe, healthy environment rather than learning the fine art of dodging traffic fumes. We have excellent schools, homes that aren’t glorified shoeboxes, and, perhaps most importantly, people who appreciate these things without feeling the need to turn their existence into an ongoing lifestyle ad.

But sure, let’s pretend the real magic of living here is found in a £6 loaf of artisan sourdough and an overpriced gym membership. Because nothing screams "good life" like reducing everything to a checklist of material must-haves.

Is this satire as well?

  • Haha 3
5 hours ago, Moovart said:

As per Amanda's South Harlesden we could rename Dulwich as EaDu, WeDu, NoDu and DuVil.  Megan's on the EaDu!  And for those streets dogged by doggy do.....doDu!  🤔

Brings dogging into mind.  I understand that this is slang for exercising canines.  People who own dogs are known as doggers.  From another thread there is some concern over dogging and doggers in the area due the state of local footpaths and parks.  Hopefully this will feature in an episode of Amandaland. As it did in the last series of Outnumbered, a rare treat as this was funnier when repeated over ten years later compared to first time round when it was a little tired.  https://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b03w7snk/outnumbered-series-5-episode-4

Compared to Amandaland very much understated

I live in UDB ie Upper Dulwich Bottom. Now Up Dub.

Edited by malumbu
  • Haha 1
3 hours ago, malumbu said:

Brings dogging into mind.  I understand that this is slang for exercising canines.  People who own dogs are known as doggers.  From another thread there is some concern over dogging and doggers in the area due the state of local footpaths and parks.  Hopefully this will feature in an episode of Amandaland. As it did in the last series of Outnumbered, a rare treat as this was funnier when repeated over ten years later compared to first time round when it was a little tired.  https://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b03w7snk/outnumbered-series-5-episode-4

Compared to Amandaland very much understated

I live in UDB ie Upper Dulwich Bottom. Now Up Dub.

Malumbu, I think you need to watch Peter Kay's Car Share dogging episode where you can get an explanation as I think you are confused and could get yourself in trouble if you start speaking to doggers in UpDub!!!

  • Thanks 1
On 18/02/2025 at 11:41, Paitro said:

Cathy Adams' article serves as a fascinating case study in modern middle class delusion where the true joys of life in Dulwich are boiled down to oat milk flat whites, designer buggies, and a performative obsession with whatever brand is currently deemed acceptable by the local mum mafia. How inspiring.

What’s truly great about Dulwich isn’t the ability to accessorise one’s life with the right labels; it’s the rare gift of having a proper community, a peaceful refuge from the chaos of London, actual greenery, and a place where kids can grow up in a safe, healthy environment rather than learning the fine art of dodging traffic fumes. We have excellent schools, homes that aren’t glorified shoeboxes, and, perhaps most importantly, people who appreciate these things without feeling the need to turn their existence into an ongoing lifestyle ad.

But sure, let’s pretend the real magic of living here is found in a £6 loaf of artisan sourdough and an overpriced gym membership. Because nothing screams "good life" like reducing everything to a checklist of material must-haves.

I think this is the pompous thing I've ever read on this site.

  • Thanks 1
3 hours ago, CPR Dave said:

I think this is the pompous thing I've ever read on this site.

Why do you think it is pompous?

I thought it was a really nice post. And all true.

Paitro's post, not the original article, in case that's not clear!

Edited by Sue
  • Thanks 1
  • Agree 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The current wave of xenophobia is due to powerful/influential people stirring up hatred.  It;'s what happened in the past, think 1930s Germany.  It seems to be even easier now as so many get their information from social media, whether it is right or wrong.  The media seeking so called balance will bring some nutter on, they don't then bring a nutter on to counteract that. They now seem to turn to Reform at the first opportunity. So your life is 'shite', let;s blame someone else.  Whilst sounding a bit like a Tory, taking some ownership/personal responsibility would be a start.  There are some situations where that may be more challenging, in deindustrialised 'left behind' wasteland we can't all get on our bikes and find work.  But I loathe how it is now popular to blame those of us from relatively modest backgrounds, like me, who did see education and knowledge as a way to self improve. Now we are seen by some as smug liberals......  
    • Kwik Fit buggered up an A/C leak diagnosis for me (saying there wasn't one, when there was) and sold a regas. The vehicle had to be taken to an A/C specialist for condensor replacement and a further regas. Not impressed.
    • Yes, these are all good points. I agree with you, that division has led us down dangerous paths in the past. And I deplore any kind of racism (as I think you probably know).  But I feel that a lot of the current wave of xenophobia we're witnessing is actually more about a general malaise and discontent. I know non-white people around here who are surprisingly vocal about immigrants - legal or otherwise. I think this feeling transcends skin colour for a lot of people and isn't as simple as, say, the Jew hatred of the 1930s or the Irish and Black racism that we saw laterally. I think people feel ignored and looked down upon.  What you don't realise, Sephiroth, is that I actually agree with a lot of what you're saying. I just think that looking down on people because of their voting history and opinions is self-defeating. And that's where Labour's getting it wrong and Reform is reaping the rewards.   
    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...