Jump to content

Recommended Posts

A friend of mine was walking along LL when a really nasty dog attempted to attack her.


Luckily the owners got to it in time (they were window shopping). It looked like one of the breeds that you see on the new constantly.


Are they meant to wear something to cover their jaws when they go out?


She was really shaken up!

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/3612-viscious-dogs-what-are-the-laws/
Share on other sites

Yeah SeanMac I know what you mean. I have grown up with dogs myself so they don't bother me, but I have to be honest, some looks really nasty and I even walk on the other side of the road if I see them acting funny.


I also think that if you have your own dog, and thus smell a little of him/her, this can attract the wrong kind of attention!

These owners get a 'hard on' being in charge of a dangerous animal. The arrogance of the man accusing you of inflaming his blessed dog, damned sauce!

A couple of weeks ago I went for a walk around Hampstead Heath about 7.30am with an ex colleague, and this large poodle was let off it's lead, it came bounding straight at us snarling and growling it did not attack us, but it was certainly unnerving enough to set my heart racing.

The guy I was with turned back and marched towards the owner so I called him off else he might have given the owner a slap.

Shouldn't all dogs be muzzled when in public?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I have sympathy with any voter, anyone, who having witnessed the last 14 years and then Labour in the last year and wonders just how can things be this bad  unless a) they voted for brexit b) voted Tory after 2010 c) is thinking of voting reform  because anyone who thinks reform won’t make things a thousand times worse after voting for the previous?  It is they who are the problem.  They are the reason the country is in the doldrums with an embarrassingly-timid Labour government  Specifically Chris mason - a not very bright right leaning stooge - large part of why bbc news has become grok-level slop  
    • In what way? Maybe it just felt more intelligent and considered coming directly after Question Time, which was a barely watchable bun fight.
    • Yes, all this. Totally Sephiroth. The electorate wants to see transformation overnight. That's not possible. But what is possible is leading with the right comms strategy, which isn't cutting through. As I've said before, messaging matters more now than policy, that's the only way to bring the electorate with you. And I worry that that's how Reform's going to get into power.  And the media LOVES Reform. 
    • “There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda ” I would call this “generous”   Labour should never have made that tax promise because, as with - duh - Brexit, it’s pretending the real world doesn’t exist now. I blame Labour in no small part for this delusion. But the electorate need to cop on as well.  They think they can have everything they want without responsibilities, costs or attachments. The media encourage this  Labour do need to raise taxes. The country needs it.  Now, exactly how it’s done remains to be seen. But if people are just going to go around going “la la laffer curve. Liars! String em up! Vote someone else” then they just aren’t serious people reckoning with the problem yes Labour are more than a year into their term, but after 14 years of what the Tories  did? Whoever takes over, has a major problem 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...