Jump to content

Recommended Posts

In C4's series of programmes this week on knife and gun crime, the head of A&E at Kings said (I think) last night that last year 319 victims of knife and gun attacks were treated in King's A&E. That's around 6 a week. I'd imagine the bulk were knifings - the programme didn't give the breakdown.

For London you can get all the stats you want from the Met


Last year's summary data Apr 07 to Mar 08 is here


Or you can look at any particular month/year just here


Don't forget to balance the figures against weight of population - more accurate figures are crimes per head rather than totalrimes as it gives an idea of 'risk'. Mind you, for the EDF risk is pretty nnon-exisent for being suject to a violent crime in the locality.

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> For London you can get all the stats you want from

> the Met

>

> Last year's summary data Apr 07 to Mar 08 is here

>

> Or you can look at any particular month/year just

> here


The head of A&E at Kings said hospital figures for knife and gun victims were more reliable than any others (perhaps because everyone gets hosiptal treatment, but not everybody is counted in the police stats).


Also note that in the case of Southwark, victims in the orth of the borough would be treated most likely at other hospitals (Guys/St T's etc.)


An 'offensive weapon' could be anything: a machine gun, a knife, a brick, or even a blunt pole supporting a banner at a demo. Wthout a further breakdown of the police stats into actual weapons/implements I don't think we learn much.


>

> Don't forget to balance the figures against weight

> of population - more accurate


Um, I think you'll find both types of data are equally 'accurate'. It's just that one set is absoluate and the other relative.


figures are crimes

> per head rather than totalrimes as it gives an

> idea of 'risk'. Mind you, for the EDF risk is

> pretty nnon-exisent for being suject to a violent

> crime in the locality.


Yes, 'in the locality'. Most people don't actually spend 24/7 on the streets 'in the locality' though. I'm much more likely to be in the street somewhere like Camberwell or Peckham or Elephant (such as travelling late at night) than I am in ED: when I'm in ED I'm usually in my house.

Louisiana are you Fisking me?


Not sure why, I wasn't saying the figures were good or bad - merely pointing out where you could find them ;-)


I agree with you totally of course, some injuries won't be reported to the police, and if you travel in high risk areas at high risk times then of course you are under high risk :-S


However, I do think we should keep things in perspective and comparative numbers often help. I don't believe in scaring people. Our victims of violence are only a fraction of those in other developed countries, and whilst it doesn't make any crime good, it does help us to build from a positive foundation rather than fear.

Is it just me or does anyone else think that the tabloids are trying to scare everyone about knife crime because they're fed up with Gordon Brown and are hoping the electorate will lurch a bit to the right in response to their fears?


I have a sneaking suspicion that in a few weeks we'll be back onto binge drinking or dangerous dogs or whtever else is the flavour of the month, irrespective of the statistics.

Yes and No James - I do think that you have massive point as it seems like the media are enjoying whipping up social problems at the moment, however, I cannot remember there ever being so many killings locally, and certainly I have never felt as uneasy on the streets round here.

Hope not.....


Drink blamed for an outbreak of violence




? Previous ? PreviousNext ? Next ?View GalleryPublished Date: 01 October 2007

By Victoria Taylor

Crime reporter

Police chiefs today hit out at binge drinkers after a spate of alcohol-fuelled violence in Portsmouth.


And police say it was women who were to blame for many of the drunken incidents at the weekend.


Inspector Jon Snook, from Portsmouth Central Police Station, said: 'It's disappointing that stupid people go out drinking to excess and clearly come ouADVERTISEMENTt of venues having drunk far too much and problems occur outside.'


His comments come as police continue with Operation Drink Safe ? the News-backed drive to cut alchol-fuelled crime.


Drunken incidents dealt with by police at the weekend included:


A 22-year-old man covered in blood who was assaulted in Guildhall Walk at 2.35am on Saturday.


Two 32-year-old men handed ?80 fines after being arrested for public order offences outside Yates's Wine Lodge shortly after 7pm on Saturday.


A 23-year-old woman from Kingston, Portsmouth, suffered an inch long cut on her forehead after being hit with a bottle at Club 8 in Guildhall Walk.


A 20-year-old woman, from Fareham, and a 21-year-old woman, from Gosport, were arrested on suspicion of assault but both released without further action after the incident at 11.30pm on Saturday.


A door steward was assaulted at Jongleurs in Gunwharf after a woman was asked to leave the nightclub at 11.40am on Saturday.


A 24-year-old woman, from Southsea, was arrested on suspicion of assault and released on bail until next month.


A 24-year-old man called police to say he was assaulted inside Liquid Envy nightclub in Stanhope Road, Portsmouth, in the early hours of Sunday.


Outside the club a 20-year-old woman from Havant was grabbed by the throat and thrown to the ground by a man at 1am on Sunday. She refused to press charges.


A 24-year-old man, from Havant, was spotted by police shouting foul and abusive language in Guildhall Walk at 2.45am on Sunday.


He was later handed an ?80 on-the-spot fine.

To paraphrase Keeler, "well he WOULD say that wouldn't he"


And to quote someone else from the forum earlier - the admissions at hospitals are more reliable than the police figures as crimes may be unreported but serious wounds tend to get treated

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • - had all the wrong connections at the wrong time - fraternised with some well dodgy blokes or rather one at least   - smart and  smooth talker - he has all the smoothness and ability to flatter - he is highly polished - skilled at making personal connections - never liked or trusted the chap, reminiscent of a slime ball
    • A friend has asked me to recommend Juliene for regular cleaning as she has some slots available. Her phone number is 07751426567
    • I'd put short odds on that but who would be his likely successor?
    • Hi, I went to the council's planning portal to look at the application, and I encourage others to look at it. It looks like a pleasant building, with thoughtful landscaping. as Pugwash said, the big oak would be retained, only two smaller trees are supposed to be cut, one of which is already dead according to the Tree Survey. It sounds like 38 people in great need of it will gain supported housing thanks to this development, a very positive change. Of course a solution has to be found for the 3 who will need to find other accommodation during the works, but that doesn't seem enough of a reason to oppose the development. The current building is 4 stories, so I would be surprised if one extra storey was considered objectionable, especially considering the big oak stands between the building and the neighbours' back gardens and the fact that the neighbours it's backing onto are all 5 stories houses themselves or only have blank walls facing the building. In the context where affordable housing is sorely missing, a 100% supported housing development is great news. Personally I've never seen a less objectionable planning request
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...