Jump to content

Recommended Posts

titch juicy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> is that head really on that body? hmmmmm, some of

> the pics look like a decent photoshop job, but

> others don't

>

> can't make my mind up if real or not

>

> look at pic 16


TitchJ, you're a bloke, aren't you? See my post. You got to pic 16? I was there at Giggi's first.

Like you I was BRUVED IN THE USA, bruv.

Titch - give credit where it's due; the man is hot for ANY age. Not photoshopped; too many photos of him looking good over too many years


http://socialitelife.com/photos/shirtless-bruce-springsteen-is-the-boss-of-the-beach/bruce-springsteen-enjoys-a-day-at-the-beach-with-his-wife-patti-scialfa-st-barts-on-january-12-2010-1


He works out and he looks good.


Hooch - this isn't the thread for you. Let's pretend this never happened.

Nah, basically he's well fit for a guy his age (or any age). All these photos have been taken on a public beach. Anyone in the public eye would be crazy to photoshop snaps taken in a public place because somebody somewhere will post an untouched photo.


http://socialitelife.com/photos/bruce-springsteen-vacations-in-porto-cervo-italy/semi-exclusive-bruce-springsteen-vacations-in-italy-2


He dyes his hair though and his roots need doing.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • To be fair to Sue, she doesn't have to explain or justify why she supports or wants to vote for any party. That is the same for everyone. We are free to decide which party best reflects what we think is important to us. Discussing the stances/ policies of parties, in a general discussion, can be done without targetting anyone commenting here. Politics is just a point of view at the end of the day.  Different things are important to different people, often for very valid reasons. Let's be respectful of that.  My opinion is that if say the Labour Party wants to understand why it is losing supporters to the Greens, it needs to listen to and understand the reasons why. That theme has been explored in this thread a little through the discussion around councillor McAsh. The same is true of the Tories losing support to Reform and the Libdems. Let's not also assume that every member of every party is completely on board with every policy of the leadership of that party either. You only have to look at how backbenchers have forced u-turns from Starmer's cabinet on things like Welfare Reform and WFA to see that. 
    • As a compromise I'd be prepared to trial the reintroduction of dog licensing. The annual licence fee would be the same as road tax for Range Rover (same carbon emissions as a dog) and would require owners to pass a responsible dog ownership exam, the dogs would need to pass training and a behaviour exam and their DNA would need to be kept on record to identify the owners who leave dog shit all over the pavements, so that they can be jailed.  
    • Yeah  Ban people, that will solve all the planets environmental issues over night  Leave the dogs as they aren't the problem, its normally bad ownership and management that leads to badly behaved dogs. Spartacus  Ps Cat Rule 
    • Some people are all of the above. Would happily ban them, or send them to training school
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...