Jump to content

Recommended Posts

'there was never any doubt that Bowie is a genius, but if there had been, this list should more than quiet any critics'


Great, all I need to do is read these books and I'm quids in for Mensa. Some of them look pretty heavy going though so I hope uncomprehending skim reading still qualifies.

BS detector:


> But book lovers should pay attention too; the curators of the exhibit, who had to select a mere 300 items from Bowie's personal archive of over 70,000, felt it was important to include many books that have effected the cultural chameleon.


Who selected them?


Do the math.


John K

Tr? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> 'there was never any doubt that Bowie is a genius,

> but if there had been, this list should more than

> quiet any critics'

>

> Great, all I need to do is read these books and

> I'm quids in for Mensa. Some of them look pretty

> heavy going though so I hope uncomprehending skim

> reading still qualifies.


Skim reading definitely qualifies. These Big Swinging Books lists are always suspect. I have a sneaking regard for people such as novelist Jim Crace, who 'admitted' in yesterday's Standard: 'I've never read a Dickens and I've never read a Hardy. Or a Bront?. Or a Virginia Woolf. Or a Henry James.' No doubt the literati are horrified...

I suppose if you're filthy rich and bring out an album every 10 years you probably DO have the time to actually read those books.


I too will admit to viz, private eye and a smattering of others.


But nothing looks especialy suspect. He likes music, a bit of history, a couple of stalwarts from usual top list suspects, and some obscure books.


I think I'd have a hard time remembering a hundred books that I'v read let alone which ones may have had an impact enough for me to recommend.


As per a meme on a different social media, I could only come up with 'The Hungry Caterpillar' and the Asterix books!!

Agree with Crace's sentiments.


Dickens is hit and miss as actual entertainment goes.

Woolfe and H James make me lose the will to live by page 360 of having more tea/existential angst with insufferable nobs, and I have nor ever will bother tackling bronte, austen or Hardy, life is too damn short!!!!!

I'm 99.9% sure El Pibe knew he would get a rise, so to not dissapoint him


the book habit is well entrenched - of the 1970s for example Bowie says:


"I took along four library trunks full of books. At least 400 books. All the books I owned. I didn't have a house then. I drove Eric (his bodyguard) crazy. He had to haul all those books around."


This was around the time he wrote and produced Low and "Heroes" albums for himself and the music for The Idiot and Lust for Life labums for Iggy Pop


Within a 12 month period


Album every 10 years... pfft

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Earthly Powers is a great read, and also doubles

> up as a handy door stop...


xxxxxx


Yeh, brilliant book.


Famous first line: "It was the afternoon of my eighty-first birthday, and I was in bed with my catamite when Ali announced that the archbishop had come to see me."


ETA: I've read 26 of the books on the list too. Intrigued to see that he's read Douglas Harding (in particular) and RD Laing.

I suspect DB's list is like anyone elses - 10% actually read, 40% started and never finished, 20% seen the film, 20% bought intending to read (just haven't got around to it yet) and 10% on the shelf just to look good and/or impress girls/boys/the boss/the staff/the shrink/the vicar/the in-laws/etc.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Leave it white .the buyer will already have a vision of what they want.
    • of course most people would avoid the "stupid" term - but I'm sticking with it fact is no other European would be so dumb, and even with the same information, the  same media, the same everything, 2 of the countries within the UK saw ho stupid an idea it was - but only the English (who played a large part in the Welsh result) pushed ahead - there is something defiantly arrogant and stupid and it isn't just down to bad info and bad leadership But that was all 2016 - it's people in 2025 who claim it to be a good idea executed badly who are especially stupid Now - does calling people stupid help anyone? It's not especially politically gainful and just gets peoples' backs up - but it remains a truth and only when the country as a whole genuinely holds it's hands up and admits the stupidity (rather than downplaying it as a poor decision - no shade meant Mal - you are just nicer and politer than me) will it begin. to turn the tide Also worth mentioning that yes I am as intractable and blunt with friends and family who voted Leave as well - this isn't me hiding behind some online anonymous account. This is what I'm like
    • Hello My name is Lizzie and I work locally as a dog walker and nanny. I won’t be needed over Summer so will have full availability for a dogsitting job. I have a DBS certificate and will provide several dogsitting references as well. Please note that I can only watch your pet at your home since they are sadly not allowed in my flat! Looking forward to hear from you
    • The decision to leave the EU was a poor one, but I'd avoid the term stupid when applied to the masses (the decision was of course stupid) and blame those who willingly misled.  A certain N Farage (pronounced with a hard G rather than the soft G he affected, rather continental eh?) being one of the main culprits. He blames the Tories for not delivering Brexit, and not really clear how Labour are playing this.  But ultimately what sort of Brexit were people voting for?  And ditto what future were people voting for last Thursday?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...