Jump to content

Recommended Posts

'there was never any doubt that Bowie is a genius, but if there had been, this list should more than quiet any critics'


Great, all I need to do is read these books and I'm quids in for Mensa. Some of them look pretty heavy going though so I hope uncomprehending skim reading still qualifies.

BS detector:


> But book lovers should pay attention too; the curators of the exhibit, who had to select a mere 300 items from Bowie's personal archive of over 70,000, felt it was important to include many books that have effected the cultural chameleon.


Who selected them?


Do the math.


John K

Tr? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> 'there was never any doubt that Bowie is a genius,

> but if there had been, this list should more than

> quiet any critics'

>

> Great, all I need to do is read these books and

> I'm quids in for Mensa. Some of them look pretty

> heavy going though so I hope uncomprehending skim

> reading still qualifies.


Skim reading definitely qualifies. These Big Swinging Books lists are always suspect. I have a sneaking regard for people such as novelist Jim Crace, who 'admitted' in yesterday's Standard: 'I've never read a Dickens and I've never read a Hardy. Or a Bront?. Or a Virginia Woolf. Or a Henry James.' No doubt the literati are horrified...

I suppose if you're filthy rich and bring out an album every 10 years you probably DO have the time to actually read those books.


I too will admit to viz, private eye and a smattering of others.


But nothing looks especialy suspect. He likes music, a bit of history, a couple of stalwarts from usual top list suspects, and some obscure books.


I think I'd have a hard time remembering a hundred books that I'v read let alone which ones may have had an impact enough for me to recommend.


As per a meme on a different social media, I could only come up with 'The Hungry Caterpillar' and the Asterix books!!

Agree with Crace's sentiments.


Dickens is hit and miss as actual entertainment goes.

Woolfe and H James make me lose the will to live by page 360 of having more tea/existential angst with insufferable nobs, and I have nor ever will bother tackling bronte, austen or Hardy, life is too damn short!!!!!

I'm 99.9% sure El Pibe knew he would get a rise, so to not dissapoint him


the book habit is well entrenched - of the 1970s for example Bowie says:


"I took along four library trunks full of books. At least 400 books. All the books I owned. I didn't have a house then. I drove Eric (his bodyguard) crazy. He had to haul all those books around."


This was around the time he wrote and produced Low and "Heroes" albums for himself and the music for The Idiot and Lust for Life labums for Iggy Pop


Within a 12 month period


Album every 10 years... pfft

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Earthly Powers is a great read, and also doubles

> up as a handy door stop...


xxxxxx


Yeh, brilliant book.


Famous first line: "It was the afternoon of my eighty-first birthday, and I was in bed with my catamite when Ali announced that the archbishop had come to see me."


ETA: I've read 26 of the books on the list too. Intrigued to see that he's read Douglas Harding (in particular) and RD Laing.

I suspect DB's list is like anyone elses - 10% actually read, 40% started and never finished, 20% seen the film, 20% bought intending to read (just haven't got around to it yet) and 10% on the shelf just to look good and/or impress girls/boys/the boss/the staff/the shrink/the vicar/the in-laws/etc.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
    • To be fair we are as hosed as the majority of other countries post-Covid. The problem is Labour promised way too much and leant in on the we need change and we will deliver it and it was clear to anyone with a modicum of sense that no change was going to happen quickly and actually taking the reigns may have been a massive poison- chalice. As Labour are finding to their cost - there are no easy answers.  A wealth tax seems straightforward but look how Labour have U-turned on elements of non-dom - why? Because the super rich started leaving the country in their droves and whilst we all may want them to pay more tax they already pay a big chunk already and the government saw there was a problem.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...