Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I recently felled a tree in my back garden because it was causing subsidence (or so the insurers told me) and I genuinely felt guilty for weeks after and I really do miss looking out at it. I for one love trees and I think the world has lost enough of them over the last century so let's give our big mates a break, and how about we cull the poster who made this thread and plant a tree in his/her honour? :-)


Louisa.

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I recently felled a tree in my back garden because

> it was causing subsidence (or so the insurers told

> me) and I genuinely felt guilty for weeks after

> and I really do miss looking out at it. I for one

> love trees and I think the world has lost enough

> of them over the last century so let's give our

> big mates a break, and how about we cull the

> poster who made this thread and plant a tree in

> his/her honour? :-)


What a pity Russelia - not be of tree stature - won't fit the bill


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russelia



>

> Louisa.

Sorry to go of topic for a second but, I think it's fairly relevant.

Can anyone help me with the punchline to an old joke.

There's a sign outside an arborists saying TREE FELLERS WANTED.

Wish I could remember the rest, but I think it involved an Irishman.

I think as well there may have been another Irishman.

And on reflection apart from the owner of the business I vaguely recall the other character may have been Irish too.

If only I could put it all together.


Anyone?

Sadly, I can. I'm sure this is racist in some way and will taint my username for ever and ever. I apologise in advance to any Irish people offended.


Two Irish men, out of work, pass a sign with TREE FELLERS WANTED written on it. One says to the other, "Aaah, if only there be one more of us, we could apply for that..."


Doesn't work in print, really.

Bloody hell Ms B and Loz, I make an innocent enquiry about a joke and end up with a torrent of what can only be described as oppressive stereotyping.

From what I can see you appear to be implying that the Irish people involved took the sign to be literally written in spoken 'Irish' vernacular and made a foolish error thereby missing out on an opportunity for gainful employment.


I find myself reduced to lowering my eyes, and shaking my head from side to side, more in sorrow than in anger.

Ms B Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "...they're looking for tree fellers and there's

> only two of us."


Ms B, I can't recall if the chaps in question had any relgious affiliation, but if they were Irish Catholics wouldn't you think they could muster at least one other relative to make up the numbers?

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sadly, I can. I'm sure this is racist in some way

> and will taint my username for ever and ever. I

> apologise in advance to any Irish people

> offended.>

> Two Irish men, out of work, pass a sign with TREE

> FELLERS WANTED written on it. One says to the

> other, "Aaah, if only there be one more of us, we

> could apply for that..."

>

> Doesn't work in print, really.


Loz, i think I can confidently say that the Irish people will not judge you harshly.


The Leprechauns on the other hand are a law unto themselves...

Dear jrussel,


I suggest you go visit New York City and see what Central Park is like and speak to any New Yorker about what that city would be like without it.... they don't call it the lungs of New York for nothing.


Nice controversial post - isn't that what the forum is all about - but I doubt you'll get much support on this issue.


-C

As one of the resident Paddies I am letting this one slide.. ;-)


As for that Telegraph story.... I'm tempted to agree with the accusation - children aren't born liking or disliking spicy food as a race.. that's learned behaviour


As for jrussel and his trees - spotted thatagenda from the original post and am just waiting for him/her to come clean

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

I give you in

> evidence


I especially liked this bit "The guide added: "Some people think that if a large number of racist incidents are reported, this will reflect badly on the institution. In fact, the opposite is the case."" Do you think they'll be setting them targets?


Sean, kids are born not liking spicy food, that's why first foods are always bland, and parents have to introduce flavour so they can learn about different foods. I'm amused by the idea that failure to teach a child that spicy food is nice is racist, though.


Oh, you were joking. :-$


On topic, still not agreeing with jrusssel at all and awaiting his draft letter with interest. However, am enjoying the freshness of an unabashedly different point of view - absolutely agree this is what the forum is for!

candj Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Dear jrussel,

>

> I suggest you go visit New York City and see what

> Central Park is like and speak to any New Yorker

> about what that city would be like without it....

> they don't call it the lungs of New York for

> nothing.


I seem to recall reading somewhere - maybe when I was travelling to Liverpool for the first time? - that Central Park was originally modelled on Birkenhead Park. (Likewise many countries' national parks took our own scheme as a model.)

Moos Wrote:

--------------------

>

> On topic, still not agreeing with jrusssel at all

> and awaiting his draft letter with interest.

> However, am enjoying the freshness of an

> unabashedly different point of view - absolutely

> agree this is what the forum is for!


I am currently working on my letter. I will post a copy of it here once I have finished and will also report back on any response to it.

London is already far denser than most new world "Houston" style cities - I dont see it needs to be much denser than it already is.


Even so, I cannot see how cutting trees will aid this aim! If we want to increase density (e.g. around public transport and business nodes), this is already happening with increased apartment building. I mean there is no more open space for more houses, further development can really only be apartments. There are few trees holding up this sort of development.


They should encourage more midrange in inner areas, and high-rise where appropriate. There is no reason why much of docklands shouldnt be 30+ storeys, large areas of SE1 (and similar inner city suburbs) 15-20 storeys. A few hundred / thousand blocks in these semi-brownfield sorts of areas will provide an efficient suitably urban environment with adequate services for those who want it, while easily allowing people to walk to work, as well as sucking up forseeable population growth.


Part of the great things about London IMO is how villagey and country it can feel just a couple of miles from the centre. Id hate it to become Tokyo.

http://www4.tsl.uu.se/~pomp/pictures/ND2001%20-%20Tsukuba/in%20tokyo/24%20-%20view%20from%20tokyo%20twin%20tower%203%20-%20tokyo%20.JPG

Oh god here we go again, not seeing the wood for the trees. I think he/she has a point, the problem in Southwark (particularly) is that trees have been planted inappropriately. Large trees should be planted where they can grow fully (i.e. parks open spaces etc) and smaller trees along the byways and highways. I would call that planning. I also think the pollarding of trees is cruel and disfiguring. If said tree had been planted in the right place it would not be necessary. And here?s the controversial bit, I'd be all for the removal of large trees which are clearly in the wrong place, if they were replaced with smaller trees. No doubt I'll be hanging from one of the larger ones after the next forum drinks. Altogether now, ?I?m a lumberjack, and I?m ok?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Would you like to rephrase this?  Your wording gives the impression that TfL is trying to expel its own employees from the country. TfL has changed nothing. The government visa rules have changed and this affects some TfL staff and their right to work in the UK.  As far as I am aware, TfL and the Mayor are working with the unions to try and keep those affected in their jobs.
    • where I've got to with left politics is very much not defined by labels - when anyone suggests (for example and without judgement) "a reformist socialist government" - my response now is: "like where? Which country is closest to this ideal and what challenges to they face?"
    • I wonder why they didn’t use Fairfield Halls with 10 times the space
    • Was anyone commenting here actually AT the meeting?  I was.  Yes David Peckham; it WAS busy. I'd estimate about 150 people filling the biggest room at Ruskin House, with some standing at the back.  And the bar was quite separate with no queue and sensible prices the twice I used it.  To Insuflo I'd say that my reading of Zarah Sultana's piece in The New Left Review accurately admitted past (Corbyn) mistakes and sought to lay a better path for the future. Jeremy is respected by millions but has not been as shrewd or tough an operator as I hope she turns out to be. Precisely the progressive point she makes despite the fact some will try to cite it as a split.  I agree The Left has been guilty of in-fighting at the cost of political success in the past, particularly given FPTP, but some of us are incurable idealists who don't just give up and snipe from the sidelines. I remember a meeting at Brixton Town Hall in the 80s where a Labour Party member advised someone from one or other of the fringe Left parties to 'get out of your ideological telephone booth'. Very funny and accurate and I never forgot the expression.  Maybe The Labour Party is the expression of liberal-thinkers who suppress their disagreements in the interest of occasionally forming a UK government, but their current incarnation is giving dangerous concessions to violent Zionists and UK fascists. Some of us have not given up hope and seek to learn from the mistakes of the past with respect to the formation of a new Left party.  The speakers listed on the poster were, I thought, intelligent and eloquent. One was determined, for instance, actually to organise people to confront the racists attacking asylum seekers in Epping and elsewhere. Another informed us about TfL seeking to change the rules to allow the expulsion of about 70 tube staff from the UK for visa-renewal reasons and that she and others are taking action to prevent that happening. Practical interventions in the real world when The Right is on the rise, emboldened by Reform and its desperate manifesto.  Another emphasised the crucial importance of ecological awareness in policy-making, although alliances with the Green Party were a matter of debate.  A youthful presence (the majority present were, like me, grey-haired) was the contributions by members of the latest incarnation of the 'Revolutionary Communist Party'. One by one they did what that party does: stand up and say 'yes we support the apparent aims of 'Your Party' but really the only solution is revolution' (they mean Bolshevik/French style).  This met with little applause, I think because most people present know that that is not going to happen here unless things get an awful lot worse. Realistically a reformist Socialist government is the furthest Left the current British population could ever countenance in my opinion.  So yes; if we let in-fighting be caused by groups who really just wish to push their manifestos at leftie forums we won't even be in a position to 'split The Left' in the way Sephiroth suggests.  I have been a union member for 22 years, helped organise a unique strike of Lambeth College Unison workers in 2016, voted twice for Jeremy Corbyn as Labour Party leader, and canvassed for him in 2024 in Islington North. Yes; mostly I've lived under Tory governments and seen the welfare state eroded, but I will always resist cynicism and defeatism.  Last night's meeting reminded me that there are decent people out there willing to try to improve society, rather than accept this Labour government as 'the best we can do'.  Peace and love.   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...