Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Ok 2 other areas (off the top of my head) that are more affordable - Penge and Sydenham.....


ED has everything really in situ, a gentrified high street, with decent bars and shops, but it wasn't always the case. The current house prices there are reflecting this.


Penge however has little gentrification, but excellent transport links to both the City and Victoria, as well as into Shoreditch etc. It also has a decent amount of housing that is not that different to the housing in ED.

EDLove Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> Ratty - why?


For a number of reasons really. Firstly, when I lived in East Dulwich someone was shot on my road and at the same time a young lad was stabbed to death on a bus in front of a bus load of passengers. Did not feel very safe then.


Most of my neighbours were burgled, my wife was flashed at outside our front door, a friend of mine was mugged leaving our house one evening about 20 yards from the door. All on Abbotswood Rd.


I got chased and threatened with stabbing by a gang of young lads just for wearing a Stussy T Shirt.


Lordship Lane on a Saturday night is full of a-holes


But also, because when I hear it from a lot of people in ED I sometimes wonder whether they really mean it feels a lot more white middle class.


Just me being honest.

ratty - I don't agree. ED is a relatively relaxed familly area. It's not white and middle class - despite the impression this forum may sometimes give, it is still an incredibly diverse area. It is also true that it can be less threatening than some other neighbourhoods of SE London ...I have lived in Camberwell / Peckham for many years - areas which I like a lot - but experienced a lot more daily aggravation / antisocial / criminal behaviour.

But both are further out of town and you pay a premium for being close to London. ED, compared to other areas within 5 miles of the centre, is still relatively cheap.


dwe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Ok 2 other areas (off the top of my head) that are

> more affordable - Penge and Sydenham.....

>

> ED has everything really in situ, a gentrified

> high street, with decent bars and shops, but it

> wasn't always the case. The current house prices

> there are reflecting this.

>

> Penge however has little gentrification, but

> excellent transport links to both the City and

> Victoria, as well as into Shoreditch etc. It also

> has a decent amount of housing that is not that

> different to the housing in ED.

rahrahrah Wrote:


-------------------------------------------------------

> But both are further out of town and you pay a

> premium for being close to London. ED, compared to

> other areas within 5 miles of the centre, is still

> relatively cheap.

>

> dwe Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Ok 2 other areas (off the top of my head) that

> are

> > more affordable - Penge and Sydenham.....

> >

> > ED has everything really in situ, a gentrified

> > high street, with decent bars and shops, but it

> > wasn't always the case. The current house

> prices

> > there are reflecting this.

> >

> > Penge however has little gentrification, but

> > excellent transport links to both the City and

> > Victoria, as well as into Shoreditch etc. It

> also

> > has a decent amount of housing that is not that

> > different to the housing in ED.


You honestly think that premium is due to 5 minutes less on a train?

I would say it's not incredibly diverse. Tower Hamlets is incredibly diverse I would say, East Dulwich, for central london (zone 2) is far from it imo!


Lived there for 20 years so must have some idea surely? Watched it get less and less diverse year on year!

I wouldn't be too sure about Honor Oak, Forest Hill, Penge, Sydenham being 'a lot' cheaper.....the areas along the Overground line are all zooming up in price. Or should i say catching up?

http://sydenham.org.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=10750

Firstly, I think Sydenham and Honor Oak are quite a bit cheaper, and Penge significantly so.


The second point is one that I would agree with - as ED becomes expensive the surrounding areas will eventually become more expensive as large numbers of people are priced out of purchasing in ED or decide that the value for money in surrounding areas is "better" for them.


This is surely how the housing market has been for years?


No one has a right to live in a particular area.....

ratty Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I would say it's not incredibly diverse. Tower

> Hamlets is incredibly diverse I would say, East

> Dulwich, for central london (zone 2) is far from

> it imo!

>

> Lived there for 20 years so must have some idea

> surely? Watched it get less and less diverse year

> on year!



Totally agree!

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ratty Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I would say it's not incredibly diverse. Tower

> > Hamlets is incredibly diverse I would say, East

> > Dulwich, for central london (zone 2) is far

> from

> > it imo!

> >

> > Lived there for 20 years so must have some idea

> > surely? Watched it get less and less diverse

> year

> > on year!

>

>

> Totally agree!


xxxxxxx


I agree too.


Can't remember whether the census figures are analysed down that far, from memory I think it's just for the borough ie Southwark, but it would be interesting to see if that perception is true.


I believe Tower Hamlets is the most diverse borough in London, or at least was. Or maybe Newham. Can't remember.

Penge and Sydenham both have a lot of housing that is nicer than anything in ED to be honest. And the fact they're not gentrified is a plus point for some if us.


Alas they are both now getting the overspill from ED and the inevitable is starting to happen.

Tower Hamlets is borough, East Dulwich is not. Personally, I think ED has moved from a predominantly white working class area to a more middle class white area over my 20 years, it's hardly Brixton or Peckham. I think you could argue it's more socially diverse now, although the balance has tipped to more middle-class. Basically it's always been fairly 'white' and now it's more middle-class white....

Have the people talking about cheap Sydenham, Honor Oak etc looked at prices recently? The cheapest 3 bedroom Victorian house (as these are often the houses people want to buy) on the market in Sydenham is ?449,000, and it's the very edge of Sydenham that is Catford. The next one up is ?625,000. Things are going for over asking there as well as here. In SE23 the cheapest on the market is ?490,000 for a repossession that already has an offer of over ?550,000.


Yes, these are cheaper prices than ED, although they are outliers to more expensive houses and will probably go for more than asking, but they are way, way higher than a year ago, and still a lot of money to anyone on anything like the average UK salary.


A standard 3 bed in the roads off Honor Oak parade is ?625,000, and those are not big houses.

I dunno, half the kids in my primary class were not white and I honestly felt like I knew of more black families living in the area growing up.


Of course that doesn't prove anything, but from my perspective it seems more white now. But yes, it was never Brixton or Peckham.

I was just reading the Guardian Saturday magazine and the "let's move to" section this week looks at Forest Gate. I'd barely even heard of it before, but having looked at some estate agents' websites it turns out you can buy a three-bed terrace with a garden there for about ?220k! It's a 13 minute train journey into Liverpool Street and it's getting Crossrail in 2017, which will get you to Tottenham Court Road in about ten minutes.


Is there any reason why the property prices there are so significantly cheaper than here?

Bit callous mick


I wonder what, say, your mortgage is like compared to people buying a house now


Of course north london and other areas are significantly more expensive but that's missing point a bit. If houses in an historically cheap part of town are out of reach for most people just saying "it's the market" doesn't solve anything

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Turn your used stamps into vital funds to support human rights around the world.   How it works: Simply send us your stamps and we'll then sort through them to sell or auction. We accept all stamps of all origin and value – both used and new. Foreign and commemorative ones are likely to be worth the most. Please leave at least half centimetre of paper around the stamps Send your stamps to: FAO Robin Sandow c/o The Post Room Amnesty International UK 2nd Floor, Peter Benenson House, 1 Easton Street, London, WC1X 0DW Recycle your stamps.AIUK.pdf
    • Also, if he enjoys design or drawing (alongside his maths & tech) he might like the Greenpeace competition for a poster (see Lounge post) - 5 days left to enter. Something more for some time at home, but ...
    • Deadline in 5 days! Important Dates 🗓 Submission deadline: 25 July 2025 🗳 Public voting opens: 7 August 2025 🚢 Winners announced: 15 August 2025   Time is running out! There are only 5 days left to submit your design for Greenpeace’s poster competition. This is your chance to help send a powerful, creative message across Europe: We must stop fossil gas, oil and coal and move toward a fossil-free future. No matter your skill level, everyone is welcome. Whether you're sketching by hand, designing on a screen, or crafting a collage, we want to see your vision. 🎨 The 3 winning designs will receive:     A printed full-size poster of your artwork     50 postcards of your design     An exclusive Greenpeace campaign t-shirt   How to enter     Design your poster     Use any style you like – hand-drawn, painted, digital, collaged. Just make sure it’s original and fits our message.     Submit your design     Upload a photo or file using the form on this page. You’ll need to include your name and contact email.     Vote for your favourites     After the submission deadline, we’ll shortlist poster designs that you can vote for! Share the voting page with your friends so you have a better chance to win.     Your poster in the European Parliament and on the Arctic Sunrise The top-voted design will be sent to all members of the European Parliament as postcards. The three designs with the most votes will be printed as posters and postcards, and will be part of the Arctic Sunrise ship tour this fall. As a winner, you will get printed versions of your poster and a Greenpeace t-shirt.    Direct link: https://www.greenpeace.org/international/act/send-your-poster-design/?utm_campaign=fff-ban-new-fossil-fuel-projects&utm_source=hs-email&utm_medium=email&utm_content=fff-poster-design-contest-3rd-email-2025-07-20&utm_term=2025-07-20-poster-design-contest-3rd-email-button-2&global_project=fossil-free-future Time is running out! There are only 5 days left to submit your design for Greenpeace’s poster competition. This is your chance to help send a powerful, creative message across Europe: We must stop fossil gas, oil and coal and move toward a fossil-free future. No matter your skill level, everyone is welcome. Whether you're sketching by hand, designing on a screen, or crafting a collage, we want to see your vision. 🎨 The 3 winning designs will receive:     A printed full-size poster of your artwork     50 postcards of your design     An exclusive Greenpeace campaign t-shirt The deadline is 25 July 2025. After that, we’ll shortlist the top designs and the public will vote for the winners. Don't wait and join today! Join the competition now 
    • Perhaps the OP already has, hence her question?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...