Jump to content

Recommended Posts

But with Westfields down the road in Stratford there are lots of new restaurants and bars, which people I work with seem to like.


Not saying it's a utopia, but susoext it's changed a lot since tourw time there which must have been the best part of 10 years back.

Finsbury Park isn't more expensive than ED. Certainly not on a per square foot basis. The 3 bed terraces tend to be a bit larger there but in general (besides the odd outlier) Finsbury get you more for your money than in ED at the moment.

LondonMix Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Finsbury Park isn't more expensive than ED.

> Certainly not on a per square foot basis. The 3

> bed terraces tend to be a bit larger there but in

> general (besides the odd outlier) Finsbury get you

> more for your money than in ED at the moment.


What about Stroud Green? Quite like that area as it's between FP and Crouch End.

I don't know Stroud Green but I like Crouch End-- I have two friends that live there. I think Crouch End is more expensive that ED though. I think in general comparable neighbourhoods in North London still trade at a premium to South London equivalents due to the perception that the South is rougher and more suburban in general.


London is going the way of New York. Within 10 to 15 years there won't be any areas within Inner London that are considered too bad. It will just be a question of taste-- do you like an arty vibe vs a genteel feel etc.

ratty Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Indeed, a new thread is needed. How middle class

> and White is East Dulwich now compared to in 1994

> when ratty moved there?


I lived in ED (Darrell Rd) in 1981 - and BOY has ED changed since then. It was the cheapest place to rent in those days that we could find (being student nurses) and very much a down at heel but pretty much ok part of SE London. Eventually bought a flat 27 years ago in Crystal Palace as it was cheap as chips. Penge/Anerley are good buys at the moment but people need to get in quick as gastropub applications are already in here and there...

Today's FT predicts the end of record low mortgage rates is close. Last week, four major lenders raised their fixed rates for the first time in 12 months??basically they're already pricing in a predicted base rate increase in Q4/Q1 2015.


Was 2007 that long ago? Not really but funny how many buyers since have forgotten when it was like this:


http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/55a55106-2a41-11dc-9208-000b5df10621.html#axzz2slAboNoh

Voyageur Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I lived in ED (Darrell Rd) in 1981 - and BOY has

> ED changed since then. It was the cheapest place

> to rent in those days that we could find (being

> student nurses) and very much a down at heel but

> pretty much ok part of SE London.


Were you one of the four frightfully posh, Sloaney nurses who drove around in a VW beetle?

Well they have to go up at some point. I won't be popular for saying this but if you have a mortgage and kept your job it's likely you did pretty well out of the downturn. Those of us renting and trying to save a deposit, not so much.

I have heard that there is a gastropub, bi weekly organic farmers market as well as a bach to baby or something rather in Forest Gate these days...


Just saying...


We were viewing a "house" in catford last night. One of these open house events. It was full of "white middle class" viewers which really surprised me and my other half (we would prob not be seen as either). I dont know what we had expected but it wasnt range rovers, labradors and barbour coats.

midivydale Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I have heard that there is a gastropub, bi weekly

> organic farmers market as well as a bach to baby

> or something rather in Forest Gate these days...

>

> Just saying...

>

> We were viewing a "house" in catford last night.

> One of these open house events. It was full of

> "white middle class" viewers which really

> surprised me and my other half (we would prob not

> be seen as either). I dont know what we had

> expected but it wasnt range rovers, labradors and

> barbour coats.


No need for inverted snobbery. Just young professionals trying to make a life for themselves like everyone else.

healey Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> midivydale Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I have heard that there is a gastropub, bi

> weekly

> > organic farmers market as well as a bach to

> baby

> > or something rather in Forest Gate these

> days...

> >

> > Just saying...

> >

> > We were viewing a "house" in catford last

> night.

> > One of these open house events. It was full of

> > "white middle class" viewers which really

> > surprised me and my other half (we would prob

> not

> > be seen as either). I dont know what we had

> > expected but it wasnt range rovers, labradors

> and

> > barbour coats.

>

> No need for inverted snobbery. Just young

> professionals trying to make a life for themselves

> like everyone else.


Doesn't sound like 'inverted snobbery' - more like an observation in the finest tradition of Henry Mayhew - very fitting.

Charles Martel Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Voyageur Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I lived in ED (Darrell Rd) in 1981 - and BOY

> has

> > ED changed since then. It was the cheapest

> place

> > to rent in those days that we could find (being

> > student nurses) and very much a down at heel

> but

> > pretty much ok part of SE London.

>

> Were you one of the four frightfully posh, Sloaney

> nurses who drove around in a VW beetle?


Ha! No. I was fresh up from Dorset. with a West Country burr to match :)

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hardly inverted snobbery. More an observation.


Really? I'd be rather surprised if the majority of people seeing that house were sporting "range rovers, labradors and barbour coats". In fact, I'd guess it was a number close to zero.

As a non brit I often fail to realise the emotional stir the class system causes. I have apologised,sincerely, and hoped that we could move on.


It was a joke, but realise that my ignorance regarding the above must have caused offense and again- it was not my attention. Not wishing to side track this thread any further just really want to say that no offense was meant. Please see the comment as it was intended - a foreginer making what she thought was an interesting observation during a viewing in catford.


The statement I naively wrote was simply that.

My father always says. "One sincere apology will always suffice, no need to grovel"



Hell - I even own a barbour coat.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...