Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I see what you're getting at now, jrussel.


If I may present my own parallel experience:


The other day I had a disagreement with an orange, who I accused of behaving exactly like Celine Dion. I understand that there are differences between oranges and Celine Dion (geographical origin, accents, cruel thin nose etc) but in the context of our disagreement - first and foremost - and without (herewith) no further ado, I, er..


And other nonsensical made-up stuff.

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I see what you're getting at now, jrussel.

>

> If I may present my own parallel experience:

>

> The other day I had a disagreement with an orange,

> who I accused of behaving exactly like Celine

> Dion. I understand that there are differences

> between oranges and Celine Dion (geographical

> origin, accents, cruel thin nose etc) but in the

> context of our disagreement - first and foremost -

> and without (herewith) no further ado, I, er..

>

> And other nonsensical made-up stuff.



You need to try a bit harder with your analogy. To start with, you need to explain the context of your disagreement. Otherwise I cannot comment and you are really just wasting everyone's time.

What's the context of your disagreement Dogster?


I'm assuming it's one of the following:

(a) Can't tell the difference in accent

(b) Think everyone who is doing 'something' (unspecified) is Ozzie

© Think that everyone in the world is a figment of your imagination and you can label them as you wish without redress


If (a) then there's no need to tell people they have no identity, just tell them you can't differentiate their accent.

If (b) then as per your request to Bob, please tell us what that 'something' is, and we'll try and help.

If © then see a psychologist as you have no friends to help you.


I suspect the underlying problem is ©, but it's exacerbated by (a), and that you're pretending it's (b) because that means you can blame everyone else.

jrussel Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You need to try a bit harder with your analogy. To

> start with, you need to explain the context of

> your disagreement. Otherwise I cannot comment and

> you are really just wasting everyone's time.


I shall expand.


I don't like oranges (excluding Satsumas & Clementines), as I find them difficult to peel and they make my fingers all sticky.

I don't like Celine Dion, as she is difficult to peel and makes my fingers all sticky.

So, whilst I am happy to recognise that there are differences between Celine Dion and oranges, in the context of how they both make me feel - ie angry - there are no differences between Celine Dion and oranges (excluding Satsumas & Clementines)


I hope this is now clear enough for you.

Yes, it would seem to be true, on the basis of the information given, to say that in the context of how they make you feel, there is no difference between the orange and Celine Dion.


So? What is your point?


*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> jrussel Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > You need to try a bit harder with your analogy.

> To

> > start with, you need to explain the context of

> > your disagreement. Otherwise I cannot comment

> and

> > you are really just wasting everyone's time.

>

> I shall expand.

>

> I don't like oranges (excluding Satsumas &

> Clementines), as I find them difficult to peel and

> they make my fingers all sticky.

> I don't like Celine Dion, as she is difficult to

> peel and makes my fingers all sticky.

> So, whilst I am happy to recognise that there are

> differences between Celine Dion and oranges, in

> the context of how they both make me feel - ie

> angry - there are no differences between Celine

> Dion and oranges (excluding Satsumas &

> Clementines)

>

> I hope this is now clear enough for you.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Oh give it a break.  We have an MP who makes racist comments, yet our media (and what seems like this Forum) that generally hate Labour (and loved Johnson) are just out looking for the dirt. It's a move on, nothing to see here.  Particularly if she used a letting agency.
    • Hi all, I highly recommend Rob Mills Gas Safe boiler engineer, helpful and knowledgeable. contact number 07952584171    
    • I don't think a single all-inclusive URL is easily doable.  When you enter a search the system presents the result without any of one's search parameters added to the URL.  So I suggest you go to https://planning.southwark.gov.uk/online-applications/search.do?action=advanced where you just need to enter the address -- use SE22 8EW -- and the  Date Received start date.  I used 1/1/2025.  The three Tesco applications, all minor things, were all made in May.  The Simple search that I'd done previously had no time limit, and didn't include anything else that might have been from Tesco in the last two years. Incidentally, when I searched on the address 29-35 Lordship Lane it did not pick up the Tesco applications, which were held as 29 - 35 Lordship Lane Grrr!  
    • BBC News - Chancellor admits breaking housing rules by renting out home https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cd04d0yxnrvo   One wonders if Southwark will go after her....;-)
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...