Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hello,


I was born at East Dulwich in the late 1950s - Is there any way I can find out exactly *where* in this hospital please? I recently had to go back there for some treatment, I noticed that some of the wards had been demolished, so wondered if the building where I was born still survived or not?


Thanks,


O1

Thanks. Oh dear, it sounds like the ward was knocked down :( Does anyone know where it was in relation to the parts of the hospital which are still standing please? The only bit I really know well (ish) is the main entrance, because I had to check in there recently.


O1

My bro was born there in the 70's, and it is the best memory I'll ever have because the cleaner outside my mum's room was Irish, as is my family, and she went to me and my Dad, "do you want to go inside?"....Anyway, I was allowed to hold my new born bro before he was even washed off and that, when I was 6. I will take that with me always.


That's my memory anyway...

Thanks and that's ironic Lilolil, I walked down that ground floor corridor after my appointment - went right down to where the surviving hospital ends. Beyond that wall is now a wasteland, and outside you can see boarded up windows. There was indeed an upstairs, with a staircase leading to it, I didn't investigate further though, it looked 'off limits'.

puwetter Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> My son was born in dulwich hospital in 1984 the

> ward he was born in has been demolished



My daughter was born there in 1984 too. I spent a little time in the maternity ward and remember we were well fed, the tea trolley came round in the evenings with milky drinks and drinking chocolate before bed.


It's all gone now but I showed her where the rest of the building used to be.

  • 4 years later...

Hello, I'm new on this Forum, and I don't even live in Dulwich any more, but I just wanted to add to this thread as my first child was born at Dulwich in 1989. At the time, I was "low risk" under GP care (Dr Peter Roseveare). Of my ante-natal friends from Paxton Green, I was the only one who didn't go to Kings - we were all 30+. I thought Dulwich Hospital looked pretty and seemed more baby-friendly.


Before Baby was born, I had two days on newly decorated pink and peach Dekker Ward; just me and a Japanese lady. I ended up having a Caesarean in Theatre One two fairly young doctors, David and Adam delivered baby; the Anaesthetist was a lady and she had a lovely string of pearls on under her theatre gown, fortunately, she was still on the ward and hadn't gone back to Kings.


I was taken back to Dekker with my gorgeous new Baby until after lunch on Day Two when to my horror I was wheeled up to Faraday Ward which was a pea-soup green colour and I was told was the old male renal unit; grim is not the word - it was noisy and hot and there weren't enough cot mattresses - the cleaning was "relaxed" (and I'm being generous) and I don't know why I bothered ordering my meals because not once did I get the right one. Ms Linda Cardozo was one of the Consultants - I remember her doing the rounds.


I feel sad that they closed the unit - I suppose everyone has to go to Kings now.

I had both of my daughters at Kings as I refused to go to Dulwich. My best friend had both of her boys there - first son was recalled as it was found one of the staff had TB and all babies born around that time had to be monitored. The next baby a few years later was rushed into intensive care at a week old and discovered to have meningitis thought to have caught it whilst in Dulwich. Both boys are fine now and have children of their own.


I worked in Dulwich Hospital around 1996 onwards and hated the wards so dingy and ancient, toilets and bathrooms were not nice and clean as too old to keep spotless.

  • 7 years later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...