Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Dear Mr Batdog,


Thank you very much. I am genuinely touched that you noticed!


You know I have some super news in relation to my blog, but I have been sworn to secrecy. I am not kidding you - I am rubbish at keeping secrets. But then, perhaps no-one is interested. That is one sure way of keeping a secret - if no-one wants to know what it is...


DM

DM, just scanned your blog and saw the comments from Anonymous. What a pr*t! Don't take any notice of people like him/her, the world wide web offers plenty of room and reading for everyone. Him/her obviously gets off on baiting you and has no concept of tongue in cheek. Like an irritating child, he/she is best ignored.:)-D
  • 3 weeks later...

No dear Mr Batdog,


Indeed it is not. This is a super blog, but nothing to do with my family. I wear Jo Malone - Lime, basil and mandarin perfume afterall! It is good to have a male perspective, but a little unnerving in that this dulwichdad claims to love my tipple and drive the same brand of car as me! I almost thought it was James for a moment!


I cannot put a link on my blog to his though, despite the fact that I like it, because I do not know the writer, and for all I know he could claim that he and his wife are a couple of "swingers" in future posts! Whatever would my publisher say to that?


You really are a super sharp dog to have spotted him!


DM

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Definitely not a charity, but a for-profit community interest company (CIC).  https://www.londoncentric.media/p/we-r-blighty-fundraising-regulator-criticism-broke-rules
    • Yes I saw that. I'm not intending to give them money! I just wonder why, if they are actually collecting money under false pretences (rather than not having gone through the proper channels) they have not been prosecuted?
    • From the Fundraising regulator link: "we concluded that it was more likely than not that donors could have been misled by confusing messaging or fundraising materials. This includes materials suggesting a link with a well-known national veterans’ charity, which the CIC has since confirmed it does not work with. We were also concerned about the costings in some of the fundraising materials that the CIC could not show good enough evidence for. There was also enough information available for us to conclude on balance that some fundraisers for the CIC acted in an aggressive and unprofessional way towards both potential donors and public officials."   Some of the money may make it to the people they say but there are better ways to support veterans 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...