Jump to content

Recommended Posts

northlondoner Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> scotslass Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Really - did you know it cost ?7 million to make!

> > WTF in this day when people are really struggling

>

> Yes the money could have been distributed amongst the poor .0


And don't go and see the new film 'Gravity' - that cost $100m to make.


Where will it end?

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 11 months later...

What sort of masochist watches commercials out of choice these days?


With PVR machines costing less than a hundred pounds there really is no need to spoonfeed lukewarm diarrhoea into your mouth and say mmmmmmmmmm.


Quite frankly, the advert sucks satan's scaly pecker - but will no doubt strike a chord with anyone who beat a path to Kensington Palace and lay a rose, blubbering like a big baby etc etc

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What sort of masochist watches commercials out of

> choice these days?

>

> With PVR machines costing less than a hundred

> pounds there really is no need to spoonfeed

> lukewarm diarrhoea into your mouth and say

> mmmmmmmmmm.

>

> Quite frankly, the advert sucks satan's scaly

> pecker - but will no doubt strike a chord with

> anyone who beat a path to Kensington Palace and

> lay a rose, blubbering like a big baby etc etc


You don't like the advert then?

It's like peering into a toilet after the flush to watch a turd go down - and finding yourself overcome with emotion by the smoothness of its removal. I'm mean, yeah, you could - but why would you want to, given the choice?


It's slick, but then by christ it should be for a cool million.

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What sort of masochist watches commercials out of

> choice these days?


You *Bob*?

>

> With PVR machines costing less than a hundred

> pounds there really is no need to spoonfeed

> lukewarm diarrhoea into your mouth and say

> mmmmmmmmmm.

>

> Quite frankly, the advert sucks satan's scaly

> pecker - but will no doubt strike a chord with

> anyone who beat a path to Kensington Palace and

> lay a rose, blubbering like a big baby etc etc

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> *Bob* Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > What sort of masochist watches commercials out choice these days?


You *Bob*?



I have an excuse: I am required to watch all manner of shite because it's part of my job. So that should I find myself sitting in Adam&Eve/DDB in front of someone wearing fashion victim sunglasses with a 'creative box' of play lego on their desk - and they ask me "hey, did you see our JL spot???" then instead of saying "no, I fast-forward all adverts because they bring nothing of interest to my life" I am able to say "YES! My body was enveloped in a curious warm glow, my heart melted - and I felt compelled to purchase a Nespresso machine and a faux-silk throw from a chain retailer sporting a slogan nobody actually understands - even the staff."

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • It’s a 4 year old on a bike do you really think he is going 15mph. Grown adults complaining about a child who probably isn’t able to string a few sentences together says a lot about the people in this forum. If this member was hit from behind the father was probably walking behind the bike so I don’t get the point of stretching out an overreaction from a child in Nursery bumping into you. Grow up Obviously a four year old should be cycling on the pavement.
    • Malumbu,  if none of us were there, does that mean that nobody should post anything on here unless they have witnesses from the EDF? Why would someone post something like this if it  wasn't true? This is not about whether children should or should not be cycling on the pavement. There are specific issues. a) the child was out of sight of the person supposed to be caring for him b) he appears to have been  either not looking where he was going or was out of control of the bike c) if he did see that he was about to hit someone  he apparently did not give them any kind of warning  d)  a person was unexpectedly hit from behind whilst just walking along, which in my view makes him a victim e) does the title of the thread really matter as the issue was described in the first post?  f) nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? The OP was not complaining about the 4 year old. They were complaining about an adult's lack of supervision of a 4 year old who was not capable of riding a bike and who hit someone from behind with no warning. Also, apart from reading the OP more carefully, perhaps also choose your words more carefully. Jobless? Lunatic? Charming.
    • Completely jobless and lunatic behaviour coming on a forum and complaining about a 4 year old and the child’s bike riding skills. Honestly grow up
    • I have to say, I too am upset about the passing of DulwichFox. He was a real local character, who unlike me, managed to stick with ED despite all of the nauseous yuppification of the last three decades. R.I.P to foxy    Louisa. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...