Jump to content

Recommended Posts

david_carnell Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Ghandi

> Mother Teresa

> Aneurin Bevan


Mother Theresa's politics were a bit iffy, to say the least. Bevan is pretty much unknown outside the UK.


I'd say only Mandela, Ghandi and maybe Einstein are true stratospheric greats in the last 100 years. Though Einstein was not a leader as such.

I wasn't really personally backing her btw, just a few that popped into my head. I don't even know what her politics are/were (my bad).


I would counter on Bevan, that just because his fame may not be great beyond these shores is no reason not to praise him.

Got to highlight the rank hypocracy of people like Cameron bigging up Nelson Mandella after his previous invovlvement in the pro-apartheid movement and posters with 'Hang Mandella' on them.


Good screen munch of a twitter convo here:


http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/file.php?20,file=116985

So few fall into the category of genuinely using their influence in making a difference. Be that in democracy, civil rights or culturally.


For me aside from Nelson Mandela,


Martin Luther King

Mahatma Gandhi

Anne Frank

Diana, Princess of Wales

Emmeline Pankhurst

Winston Churchill


All for very different reasons.


Louisa.

:)


JFK my arse.

FDR, now that's another matter.


Churchill, well yes and no, but I'm inclined to feel that his will to resist nazism outweighs his black marks. A Britain that sued for peace would have made for a much darker world.


Steveo, perhaps, noone's sure but it probably was an accident, certainly doesn't count against the hundreds of thousands of lives he surely spared had he been more of an Assad mindset.


Perhaps even less famous than Bevan (and I'm inclined to agree with D_C again on that point*) butI'm going to add Bertrand Russell as one of the 20th century's greats.


*just cos le tis didn't wow a world cup, don't mean he weren't the best.

Diana was an inspiration to a lot of people in her short life and she made a huge influence in the field of charity work especially bringing land mines to the public attention as well as hugging dying people suffering from HIV/AIDS at a time when many people in authority still shunned away from this tragic illness and it's impact on whole communities. So not I'm not 'kidding you'.


Anne Frank unwittingly has influenced the world in what was a terribly short life by exposing how hatred and oppression can be documented through the eyes of a child. Even today children learn about her short life in school, making the awful effects of nazism and fascism relevant through the eyes of a youngster.


Winston Churchill Grew up and took part in the British Empire, I'm not saying everything he did was relevant in respect of inspirational or greatness. But his influence on the United States was second to none in preventing what would have been annihilation for this country had he not been able to gain favour with the Americans during those dark early years of World War Two.


Louisa.

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> as well as hugging

> dying people suffering from HIV/AIDS at a time

> when many people in authority still shunned away

> from this tragic illness and it's impact on whole

> communities.




Much as I wanted to smash my head against a brick wall during the weird outpouring of public grief following her death, I totally agree with this point, and don't think she gets the recognition from some quarters for the good stuff she did.


Not sure I'd personally have her on a list with Nelson though.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I also wonder if all this, recently events and so many u turns is going to also be the end of Kier Starmer.
    • And I replied: Mandelson and Trump have much in common. They are both shallow, vulgar and vain. They both fetishise wealth and power, irrespective of who holds it or how it was accumulated. They were both close friends and associates of the late Jeffrey Epstein and have moved in the same circles, as Ghislaine Maxwell’s address book allegedly confirms. Recognising another who is utterly transactional and lacking in a moral compass, there’s every chance of “Petie” fitting right in Mar-a-Largo. That Starmer couldn’t anticipate that Mandelson’s past behaviour would be problematic just proves how inept this government is.
    • Can't agree with that because he is a superb communicator - a really smart and  smooth talker. He studied PPE at Oxford and was communications director for Labour for many years.  Setting aside the "minor"  indiscretions during his time in government he has all the smoothness and ability to flatter Trump without appearing obsequious. Plus he can manage and exploit  Trump’s ego. He is highly polished socially, comfortable in elite circles, skilled at making personal connections. He can flatter and disarm, which is a useful tactic with Trump, who responds well to personal respect and praise. As a former EU Trade Commissioner and Cabinet minister, Mandelson understands international relations, trade, and diplomacy. He knows how to frame issues in terms of “wins” that Trump could claim credit for. I honestly hope that he survives.  
    • He is toast  he should never have been appointed  and starmer flannelling about all of this shows exceptionally poor judgement  a disgrace all around 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...