Jump to content

Recommended Posts

A Northern Irish pedant writes...


"Team GB" is just marketing nonsense. At the end of the day, being able to put "great" into the name of the team is something most countries don't manage and you can't blame them for trying. However, the team which was sent by the British Olympic Association represents the "United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland with the Crown Dependencies" - for the last bit note Mr Cavendish in the cycling - but I think someone sensibly decided that this was probably a bit of a mouthful - and probably even worse in Mandarin.


Have a look at www.olympics.org.uk and see in particular the history of the BOA or press releases with "Notes to Editors" that "Team GB" have been issuing (example here) for the following boilerplate: "The British Olympic Association (BOA) is the National Olympic Committee for Great Britain and Northern Ireland..."


One of the good things about being born in NI is that people can choose whether they want to represent Ireland or the UK, and while doubtless it's great craic travelling with the Irish team, it would not be entirely cynical to suggest that at least some of the choices made by individuals have been down to the fact that you might be more likely to get into the Ireland team (due to the smaller available pool of athletes available compared to the UK team).


Of course, it could all be a conspiracy...

Did anyone watch the women's 200m heat? I swear there was a smurf or a life-sized sperm running down the track.


Having just watched the replay, I realise that it is probably a running-in-purdah type outfit. No offence meant. Better covered up than all hanging out.

I don't know so much about getting rid of sports from the Olympics, I'd actually be in favour of increasing the numbers of events. Take swimming for example. Should certainly add in more strokes such as doggy paddle and side stroke. And that one where you lay on your back and float forwards, feet first. In the horse riding I'd like some breakdance dressage, just to liven it up a bit and in the cycling isn't there room for tandems in there somewhere? And for the love of PGC's Jesus, I trust they have not got rid of the walking races, now there is a sport I would queue to see. Of course I'd also include backwards walking.

Moos and PGC, you're going to love this.


Firstly, just watching the pony bit of the Modern Pentathlon and it's a mud bath in the arena turning the event into, as a BBC texter said, a live action version of Buckaroo.


Secondly, breaking news from HQ. A number of horses have tested positive for banned substances. No news on how many or what substance but this is BIG people. I think it's a safe bet it wasn't ketamine! :))

Oh good grief! Just how hard is it to pass a bit of scaffolding from one person to the next without f%^king things up? Very, seems to be the answer as both us, the Yanks and the Nigerians all fail this seemingly simple task in the 4x100m relay, and are out.


The hop, skip and jump lad seems to be doing ok though. On for a gold.

Has anybody noticed that we Brits excel in one particular kind of sport?


The "sitting-down" kind. Sailing, canoeing, cycling; as long as we sit on our arses we are brilliant.


Had Zara Pilips not sprained her horse we would have got a gold in the "sitting on your arse on a horse" kind of sport as well.


We also got a medal or two in swimming, which really is a "lying down" sport.


Its in the "standing up" sports that we fall over.


Also...


An obvious solution to the London 2012 athletes accommodation issue. The armed forces have been reduced in size to the point that we have a bloke with a bread knife tied to a broom handle protecting us from the undefined menace that is menacing us. SO, all of those military tents that the MoD has in store are going begging. Erect them all in the parks of London and you have an athletes accommodation solution that also brings extra trade to the corner shops, chippies and curry houses of the capital as the athletes seek sustinance for their coming endeavours.


The only draw back would be the unsightly yellow grass left afterwards, but you cant have everything.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I fully support this petition, however it will need to be shared far & wide to be effective. Also there is always a huge amount of interest / objection during the festival, but not so much when they start consulting for the next one, usually around January. It's crucial that everyone that has been impacted makes their voice heard then.  A couple of points which may be good to include in the wording (if it is still possible to amend?) - The total tickets sold are way more than 3000. The licence allows a capacity of up to 9,999, but this may include staff & performers etc. The published attendance for 2024 was:  Friday – 8,999 / Saturday – 9,512 / Sunday – 9,422 So that's c.28,000 people trampling & littering our park over three days - people who have no need or desire to take any care or consideration of our park.  - Gala claim for 2024 that "62% of all ticket holders were from Southeast London and 18% of these were from hyper-local postcode areas SE15 and SE22." So a bit of maths shows that means that around 89% of attendees were not what most people would term 'local'... - Gala have ambitions / plans to extend the number of event days to 6, over two weekends. They applied for a licence for this in 2024, but then withdrew it. Instead they added a "free" event, billed as a community day, to the existing 3 day festival, thereby increasing the event days to 4.  This would appear to be an attempt to set a precedent for increasing the number of event days, and it's inevitable that they will attempt to secure the 6 days they desire for 2026, to increase their profits further. Two weekends in a row of noise, disturbance & disruption would be unacceptable, plus an extra c.18,000 trampling & littering the park... - The site size has been increased. The claim is that it is to compensate for lost storage space due to recent flood alleviation works, but the area has increased by more than the area lost, and appears to have been used for attendee activity rather than site storage. Gala have often stated that the festival can only be located in the park because the footprint has been designed specifically for that area, and yet this year the footprint had been amended & extended without any apparent issues. Surely this proves that it could be relocated?  Apologies, I just can't help going into rant mode on this issue, but hopefully some of the above may be helpful in increasing the argument presented by the petition?
    • Best to just get in touch with the council. You need to see what works were approved and the scope.  It's probably advisable to get an independent legal survey (not a standard RICS) and look at current condition, what they said they'd fix, if they did what they said and what the problems are with what they did. Was it just your flat and the other flat mentioned? Asking in case there's any other leaseholder/ tenant involved  
    • Terry did some work for us recently, putting in an outdoor socket - happy to add my recommendation to this thread. Lovely chap, takes pride in his work, and charges a reasonable price. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...