Jump to content

Recommended Posts

fabfor Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Just for the record, not one but 10+ scientific

> studies that prove consciousness can alter our

> material world:

>

> http://www.collective-evolution.com/2014/03/08/10-

> scientific-studies-that-prove-consciousness-can-al

> ter-our-physical-material-world/

>

> I find the first one particularly shocking.


Awesome yes, intriguing yes, shocking ... not really.


Observation does not mean a person looking at something. You can take the human or the cat out of the experiment and you'd still get the same. You can get an education in physics and mathematics and help understand the reality or take a more comforting short cut and just make sh*t up. The latter is the fascinating world of the pseudoscience which includes the ghost hunters, the homeopaths of Lordship Lane and the chichi reiki quacks of east dulwich.

fabfor Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> @root. The vitriol I'll leave with you but I'll

> take awesome every time. I thank you for that.


Not vitriol ... pity and disdain maybe ... after years of dealing with stupid I don't have it in me to suffer fools gladly

Anyhow, on the more important subject of whether there is more to this world than meets the eye, examples 1 and 3 in the link above demonstrate beyond reasonable doubt that "mind over matter" is scientific fact.


As pioneering physicist Sir James Jeans wrote: ?The stream of knowledge is heading toward a non-mechanical reality; the universe begins to look more like a great thought than like a great machine. Mind no longer appears to be an accidental intruder into the realm of matter, we ought rather hail it as the creator and governor of the realm of matter. Get over it, and accept the inarguable conclusion. The universe is immaterial-mental and spiritual.? (R.C. Henry, ?The Mental Universe? ; Nature 436:29,2005) (source)

The problem is as well as the human mind perhaps being able to alter reality - it can also perhaps alter perception of reality - so how can you ever know.


Then again nobody knows - unfortunately never seen anything even though I look and my dead mother was a spiritualist. Maybe ghosts avoid me.

  • 1 year later...
I think one of the problem with East Duwich and surrounding areas is that there's simply too much crazy around. From homeopathy, to reiki, to all kinds of chi chi and a above all too many god botherers. Get over it, there's no evidence of mind over matter (yes there are still some things we have to explain but just because we don't fully understand some mechanism doesn't mean we can draw any conclusion that we fancy), there's no evidence that water has memory, and above all there is no evidence that there is some god (or many) or that he's the one you choose to believe in. And yes, there is no evidence or reasons to believe that our departed are in a better place, watching over us, or some other rubbish. Get over it, your beloved dead ones are just dead. Gone. Ceased to exist. Forgotten in a few years' time, and one day, before you even know it you all will face that same fate, some more horribly than others. Have a good weekend.
While you are happy root to disbelieve some people's notions of various things, you can't actually prove anything can you? Oh it's just because we don't understand everything yet. Really? YOU have no chance of understanding everything anytime soon with an attitude full of so many preconceived ideas. They say ignorance is bliss. You must be very happy indeed.

The catch is that I don't have to prove anything because I'm not making any claims.


You want to believe homeopathy has memory when there is no solid argument in favour and no good quality evidence and reproducible results? Actually on the contrary it's been discredited over and over again. You can still believe in it, but don't expect more sensible people to consider you anything more than plain bonkers.


Or are you saying that I don't beliueve god or any other some other east dulwich ghost because I have preconceived ideas?

Unfortunately beloved do get forgotten because we all die do you have to be realistic - how can you be beloved of you great great great grandfather when your parents never knew him ?!


However true the "you're just dead" bit is, there's probably less harsh ways that could be said !

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Unfortunately beloved do get forgotten because we

> all die do you have to be realistic - how can you

> be beloved of you great great great grandfather

> when your parents never knew him ?!

>

> However true the "you're just dead" bit is,

> there's probably less harsh ways that could be

> said !


How 'bout Victor Landa - "In our tradition, people die three deaths. The first death is when our bodies cease to function; when our hearts no longer beat of their own accord, when our gaze no longer has depth or weight, when the space we occupy slowly loses its meaning.


The second death comes when the body is lowered into the ground, returned to mother earth, out of sight.


The third death, the most definitive death, is when there is no one left alive to remember us."

You made loads of claims root which mostly were that people who believe in certain things are basically nuts. Explain for example how you know that those whose bodies have died are dead? They may well be if you think a human if simply a body and all its parts. But can you prove it, as you are certainly claiming all elements of a dead person are gone forever?


Your ideas are as small minded as those who you choose to ridicule for the same reason, as you can't prove a thing. I'm not saying you are wrong, I'm saying you can't prove it.

That pretty much sums it up. (Maxxi's post)


We are remembered by what we leave behind, so great musicians, artists, scientists, discoverers are immortalised by their work. But if like the vast majority of people, you leave no significant mark on the world, then eventually you'll be forgotten. We're all just insignificant specs really.

Is it important to be remembered? I don't think so as you're gone. Though it was quite interesting on leaving here for a while, to read my own 'obituary' in a thread even though I wasn't dead. We are insignificant in the greater scheme of things, but while you have a life it is anything but insignificant to you and others close to you.

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You made loads of claims root which mostly were

> that people who believe in certain things are

> basically nuts. Explain for example how you know


well, deluded at best


> that those whose bodies have died are dead? They

> may well be if you think a human if simply a body

> and all its parts. But can you prove it, as you

> are certainly claiming all elements of a dead

> person are gone forever?


I am saying there is no evidence that points to anything beyond so it's not reasonable to live with the expectation or belief that there is.


>

> Your ideas are as small minded as those who you

> choose to ridicule for the same reason, as you

> can't prove a thing. I'm not saying you are wrong,

> I'm saying you can't prove it.


It doesn't make much sense trying to disprove something there is no reason to suspect in the first place.

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Is it important to be remembered?



No, as you say, you won't know whether you are or not.


The point is simply that being remembered is probably the only way you'll "live on" in some sort of way.

root, just because there isn't any evidence doesn't mean something might not be true. It may not be but you can't prove any of what you have disputed so far. You have an opinion. you're welcome to it and it's your right. But if I tell you that I have come back from the dead, what would you say?

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> root, just because there isn't any evidence

> doesn't mean something might not be true. It may


I just want to see the evidence, if there is no evidence and reason behind a claim then it's 'cute' at best, hilarious (like ghosts), or cringeworthy (like god) at worst.


> not be but you can't prove any of what you have

> disputed so far. You have an opinion. you're

> welcome to it and it's your right. But if I tell

> you that I have come back from the dead, what

> would you say?


Show me the evidence, otherwise I can recommend you to mental health professionals who can help with your psychosis.

Ermm root do you mind not rehashing one of my favourite threads to ridicule and demoralise those who believe in it, and indeed those who may well be i. The middle of the grieving process at present. It's crass and achieves sweet FA in the grand scheme of things. Trolling at its worst.


Louisa.

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Ermm root do you mind not rehashing one of my

> favourite threads to ridicule and demoralise those

> who believe in it, and indeed those who may well

> be i. The middle of the grieving process at

> present. It's crass and achieves sweet FA in the

> grand scheme of things. Trolling at its worst.

>

> Louisa.



Exactly. Whether you agree with something or not, it's HOW you say things.


If you disagree, show a bit of empathy and humanity and THINK...............


About how your post might affect others.

root Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Alan Medic Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > root, just because there isn't any evidence

> > doesn't mean something might not be true. It

> may

>

> I just want to see the evidence, if there is no

> evidence and reason behind a claim then it's

> 'cute' at best, hilarious (like ghosts), or

> cringeworthy (like god) at worst.


I'm not saying I have evidence, but neither do you. If you haven't experienced something it doesn't mean it doesn't exist. It just doesn't exist for you.

>

> > not be but you can't prove any of what you have

> > disputed so far. You have an opinion. you're

> > welcome to it and it's your right. But if I

> tell

> > you that I have come back from the dead, what

> > would you say?

>

> Show me the evidence, otherwise I can recommend

> you to mental health professionals who can help

> with your psychosis.


Hang on, show you the evidence of what? I don't have any evidence for you but neither have you evidence to say people/souls do not exist after death.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Yes, because of course there were no violent robberies in the olden days. Pretty much no crime happened at all I believe through the entire Victorian era.
    • Hi all, Im a Southwark council leaseholder and live downstairs in a ground floor flat, there is one flat above me, it's a house with individual front doors leading from the street into the shared pathway. My neighbour told me he has had a ring doorbell installed, no discussion as to how I would feel being on camera everytime I go in and out or in my front garden. I was told it's only for deliveries and doesn't record and only activates when pressed, however I don't know this and I feel really uncomfortable everytime I'm out in garden or on doorstep talking to people. Everytime I walk in/out, it lights up and in the eve it has a  infra red  light. Now I've read up that as he said its only for deliveries, he could set it so it only activates when pressed, however it activates with its motion sensor. Had he said to me about getting it installed, I could have had the opportunity to ask about it recording etc but nothing except it's being installed and when I arrived home it was there. I don't like being horrible to people however I feel I have not been considered in his decision and I feel very uncomfortable as, some times I have to stand on doorstep to get signal for my mobile and I really don't like the idea of being watched and listened to. Has anyone got any advice as I'm beginning to get angry as I've asked about it once and was told it only activates when pressed. I believe this is not true. I know southwark council say you need to ask permission to make sure the neighbours are OK with it, I don't really want to go down that road but I don't know how to approach the subject again. They also put a shed approx 3 foot from my back room window, these places are built so my window faces their rear garden and there upstairs window  faces mine. They said it's there temporarily, that was over a year ago and it does affect the light, plus I'm hoping to sell up soon and the view from window is mainly a dark brown shed. When I've mentioned this, I was told they have no where else to put it, whereas originally they said its only temporary, Also the floorboards above are bare and I get woke early morning and at night, the thudding is so bad my light shakes and window rattles, so I mentioned this and asked if they have rugs, I was told when they get the boards re sanded they will get rugs, I should have asked if they could get rugs and just take them up when boards being done, which I would have done had it been me living above someone, their attitude was I can just put up with it until they are ready. so they had the floor boards done, and the workmen was hammering screws, yes screws, in the floorboards, I spoke to workmen to ask how much longer and they said yes, are using screws to make less noise! I could hear the cordless screwdriver, not an issue but for every screw there were at least 8 whacks, the owners had gone out to avoid the noise  so I  spoke to workmen as the noise was unbearable, the sanding, not an issue at all, people need to get things done to their home and I'm fine that on occasions there will be temporary noise. now I have a nice crack on my bedroom ceiling, I mentioned this to owner but no response, he said there were alot of loose floorboards and it will be much better now, not so noisy, as though I don't know the difference between squeaking floor boards and thudding, and nothing was mentioned re the crack or that they now have rugs, which if it were me, I'd be trying to resolve the issue so we can get on with feeling happy in our homes. so I'm feeling it's a total lack of consideration. these places are old and Edwardian and I've lived here over 40 years, had 4 different neighbours and it's only now the noise of thudding is really bad and the people before had floorboards but nothing like this. As you can probably tell I'm really wound up and I don't want to end up exploding at them, I've always got on with neighbours and always said if there's a problem with my dog, pls let me know, always tell me, however I feel it's got to the point where I say something and I'm fobbed off. I know I should tell them but I'm angry, perhaps I should write them a letter. Any suggestions greatly appreciated and thank you for reading my rant. 
    • Sadly, the price we now all pay for becoming a soft apologetic society.
    • Exactly the same thing happened to me a few years back; they were after my Brompton. Luckily there were only 3 of them so I managed to get away and got a woman to call the police, then they backed off, but not after having hit me in the back of the head first. Police said next time just give them what they want, but I sure as hell wasn't just going to hand over my bike to them!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...