Jump to content

Incident Somerfields (Lounged)


Marmora Man

Recommended Posts

I agree with Louisa - how do we know the guy wasn't the same dangerous pervert who was taking "waist-high" photos of children in Peckham Rye? Or, and this might even be worse, maybe he was from an al qaeda cell intent on blowing up the area before the Adventure Bar can wreak even more drink-soaked, godless insanity on Lordship Lane?

I say, hang him. Only language etcetc

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think everyone's being a bit hard on Louisa. Perhaps she went a bit far (as she often does) but I do think it's depressing how people seem to take such self-righteous pleasure in finding a person in authority who's abusing it. Never mind the criminal (we feel guilty about condemning him/her). Focus on the one in authority. It's a distinctly middle-class indulgence. We do it and feel oh so politically correct and smug. Like we're defending the little guy.


Unfortunately the overall effect is to give the impression that the security guard is somehow worse than the shoplifter. This is dangerous. I believe it's undermining some people's sense of personal responibility for their actions.


Recently my partner was a victim of assault by a person known to the police. We had to take it to court, and we have done everything by the book. The justice system as a whole has been utterly, utterly HOPELESS so far. There is so much emphasis on protecting his rights and giving him a fair hearing that the case has virtually collapsed. This is despite the fact that we have an independent witness! The perpetrator must be laughing his head off.


I'm sorry but the thought of some nasty thug like him getting some rough justice at the hands of a security guard is, in my opinion, a good thing!


Incidentally, I am not some rightwing reactionary who wants hanging brought back. I just down't want to live in a society that, when confronted with criminals, turns a blind eye and starts wringing its hands out of some weird misplaced sense of guilt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Asset Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's alright, don't apologise candj, I was being

> facetious.

.....????...I'm certain candj was,as well.She is,surely,jokingly adding to the fun by,obviously,saying "tongue-in-cheek" "Oh! No! Thats a teensy-weensy bit tooooo much!"...She's joking One THousand Million Per Cent!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

James,


You don't want a society that, when confronted with criminals, turns a blind eye. I agree entirely.


I saw criminal behaviour - an assault on a person who was, allegedly, a shoplifter. I intervened. I certainly did not take any self righteous pleasure in finding a person in authority abusing their position. If the alleged shoplifter was truly guilty he should be punished thought the court, magistrate or jury system, not beaten up by vigilantes.


If more people took a stance on anti social behaviour of all kinds - there might, just might, be a fall in crime and a growth in the acceptance of certain "social norms" about what is right / wrong. So do ask the teenager to turn down their phone, do stand up and offer a seat to a pregnant lady, do remind people about littering.


Your own situation experiencing the terrible bureaucracy of the courts / justice system is undoubtedly horrible - but it cannot be a reason to abandon the proper due process of law - it is a reason to do more to ensure it is properly deployed by staff that have open minds, common sense and a perspective about the real balance between victim and perpetrator. Something you indicate, and I believe, to be out of kilter at present.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

James Wrote:

I do think it's depressing how people seem to take

> such self-righteous pleasure in finding a person

> in authority who's abusing it. Never mind the

> criminal (we feel guilty about condemning

> him/her). Focus on the one in authority. It's a

> distinctly middle-class indulgence. We do it and

> feel oh so politically correct and smug. Like

> we're defending the little guy.

.....THAT IS EXACTLY what irritates me to be honest!...INVARIABLY the people with these views are NOT personally affected by Crime,particularly street crime.Visited my friend in his ?1,000,000 Property.All-Jewish Neighbourhood in East Finchley last week(they buy any outstanding vacant property in his Cul-De-Sac to keep "others" out-WELCOME TO THE REAL WORLD!) and to hear the Liberal Views of people who will,realistically,never be personally affected is LAUGHABLE,totally surrealistic to be honest.No concept of living on major Housing Estates and personally experiencing the "end product" .Then hear the viewpoint of almost everyone with many years experience of living in an area with a high crime rate!

If you ask 95% of People in these(or formerly these) areas you would have a totally different perspective and these people EXPERIENCED living in a "relatively" unsafe/lawless area.How frustrated would these people feel if they heard the views here?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Totally agree with you MM. I am not advocating vigilante behaviour. The security guard should not have used excessive force. We all must accept the due process of the law.


What worries me is the signal that all this concern for the shoplifter sends out. He/she will walk about feeling victorious, thinking "I know my rights" and so on. Perhaps he/she will feel emboldened to do it again - maybe trying to spark a confrontation. He knows that, whilst he can always cry injustice or excessive force or whatever (and be heard!) the system must be seen to be fair. Hence it is tipped in his favour.


I wonder how those who have posted in defence of the shoplifter would feel if he stole their wallet? Or burgled their house? Would they be so concerned for his welfare?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In this case they were not restraining, not using reasonable force, not defending themselves, not giving a "good 'ol clip round the ear", they were punching someone in the front of the store. He may have been guilty of shoplifting, he may not have been, but it's not right that private security guards can acceptably dish out physical punishment as a form of justice.


It's scary and amusing that some people think of Somerfield's security guards as the representatives of the British justice system.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh this is just bollocks now


The quote from james pulled out by tony is so wrong its untrue. Massive generalisation masquerading as fact. And then tony piles in with his generalisation. It is not invariable tony ok? I have been burgled and attacked. People are using this to do the usual trotting out of phrases like politically correct and liberal when it has no meaning. No one is defending the criminals actions. No one. Why cant people like tony and louisa accept that? Why oh why etc etc


But yes. . If we cant expect those charged with upholding the law to uphold the law where does that leave us? Lets debate this but no facts and not no hobby horses please. .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Oh this is just bollocks now .

Steady Old Chap!B)

>

> The quote from james pulled out by tony is so

> wrong its untrue. Massive generalisation

> masquerading as fact. And then tony piles in with

> his generalisation. It is not invariable tony ok?

> I have been burgled and attacked. People are using

> this to do the usual trotting out of phrases like

> politically correct and liberal when it has no

> meaning. No one is defending the criminals

> actions. No one. Why cant people like tony and

> louisa accept that? Why oh why etc etc

.......I accept that Sean! 'onest Guv'nor!


Sean:There is no doubt that the possibility and likelihood of becoming innocently a victim of crime is MUCH greater in some areas than others.No guarantees,of course but I usually forget to lock my back door where I live now,for example, and never lock my car in my drive..I know from 25 years living here that,thus far,there has been no problem for me or anyone I know of(to my knowledge)..thats not to say that one can not be a victim here or in a pleasant part of our great City but the chances are much less.A guy I heard of moved into an Estate in Kidbrooke and has been burgled 5 times in under 7 months.As he replaces the items,in come the boys again.(6)...Where I used to live in Inner London now has Security Doors at the entrance and Grills on some windows by comparison.Listening to the Cognescenti from Hampstead/Highgate is always guaranteed to get my pecker up:))

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No one deserves a kicking- by the filth or by security guards, irrespective of their supposed offence


IME, Security guards have a propensity to thieve better than the average shoplifter, but with a bit more impunity


Im torn on the shoplifting issue to be honest - if someone has no other means of surviving, then I dont have a beef, but this isnt usually the case nowadays

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mark! HELP! You are,obviously,a self-proclaimed expert on this Subject and yet you,the expert who has kindly,not once but twice,taken the time and trouble to correct me, spells "fullstop" like this and yet I have just read:


"A full stop or period (sometimes stop, full point, decimal point, or dot), is the punctuation mark commonly placed at the end of several different types of sentences in English and many other languages. A full stop consists of a small dot placed at the end of a line of text, such as at the end of this sentence"

Confused,Bexley.(?)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shops have insurance policies perhaps, but shoplifters only make the goods more expensive for everyone else. So effectively they are stealing from the pockets of innocent people. Giving these people a good kicking is probably more effective than a slap on the hand by the police. Although I'm not condoning such violence (mush harsher policing should be employed in my opinion), the sad truth is, it's probably true. I'll bet that chap will think twice next time he thinks about slipping a pack of batteries down his trousers!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How many of the good people posting here can say that they have never shoplifted, even a sweetie as a kid. Nicked the apples from an orchard or grazed on grapes in the supermarket.I am not condoning crime but Snorky makes a good point and some people are just a little too quick to point the finger.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

snorky Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

>

> Im torn on the shoplifting issue to be honest - if

> someone has no other means of surviving, then I

> dont have a beef, but this isnt usually the case

> nowadays



I once was in a grocery store in China and they had detector tags (the ones that make the alarm bells ring) on cans of baby formula. It made me sad.


Sorry administrator, you might as well put this in the lounge next to the 'Peckham Rye Furtive Camera Perv' thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another point is that a person is completely within the law to use reasonable force against a person that poses an immediate danger, even if they do not hit out first. If the security guard was threatened with a knife (even if not shown), then reasonable force can be used if he felt he was in danger. That doesn't necessarily mean just restraint. Of course, kicking a person whilst they are already on the floor will probably not be seen as 'reasonable force' in the courts. I'm no lawyer, but I'm pretty sure a person is allowed to make the first 'defensive attack' under such conditions.


There is no point in discussing the specifics of this case though, since most people were not there to witness. Personally, I've been on the other end of an attack. Not by a security guard, rather a random attack in Clapham. I pressed charges and the chap was done for Criminal Assault (should have been ABH really). He was a pretty senior director in the city and I understand he lost a pretty high paid job as a result. He'll certainly find it hard to work again in such a role. Justice can be achieved if you're prepared to go through the right channels...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • More interested in the future than the past. 
    • The plans The developer Berkeley Homes have submitted a planning application to redevelop the Aylesham Centre close to the junction of Peckham High Street and Rye Lane, containing Morrison’s supermarket, car park, & petrol station, Aylesham shopping arcade and most of that side of Rye Lane between Hanover Park and Peckham High Street. The application is for a mixed housing, retail, leisure and commercial development, in buildings ranging from 5 to 20 storeys. Impact Local people who have studied the detailed plans think that the development would dominate the historic town centre which has evolved since the 18th century, and would ruin the Conservation Area which was awarded in 2011 'to preserve and enhance its character and appearance'. More than 65% of the homes to be built in this unimaginative over-bearing development will be unaffordable by most people who live in Southwark, and provide inadequate open and green space for this part of Peckham. Need for discussion This is such an important issue for south London that it needs wide discussion before the Council Planning Committee takes its decision (not before next Spring). A free on-line talk and discussion to clarify the heritage issues we all need to think about is being held on Monday 11th November 7-8.30pm. All will be welcome. Please register on this link: https://Defend-Peckhams-Heritage-2024.eventbrite.co.uk There are several other key issues raised by the plans which are being examined in the Aylesham Community Action (ACA) campaign. You can find the link to all that and other useful information here: www.linktr.ee/acapeckham The zoom session is being arranged by Peckham Heritage the local group that has grown from the community work alongside the restoration of nine historic buildings in Peckham High Street through the Townscape Heritage Initiative. We hope that EDF members who value local heritage will be able to attend the session to hear and take part in the discussion, and report back to this topic so the discussion can continue.
    • I did see a few Victoria bound 185's on East Dulwich road around 5pm this evening. Coming from the Rye end and heading toward Goose green
    • I cant quite pinpoint where she is exactly. But currently notice I am not hearing her this evening!! She has a microphone? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...