Jump to content

Recommended Posts

giggirl Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Grown women who wear pyjamas with pictures of

> cutesy teddy bears (or similar) on them. Give me

> a break - these shouldn't be seen on anyone over

> the age of 16. Either sleep on the raw or get

> some grown up lingere.


Oh giggirl, so true! A friend of mine earlier this year took one look at my brushed cotton pyjamas (no teddy bear prints at least) and said "Good God.... what has become of you?" Her words were a short, sharp, shock I can tell you.

Oh dear BB - I'm shocked and saddened. But at least you had a true friend. Personally, I put all my underwear and nightwear through the GC test, and that does the trick for me. I take a long hard look at the item, and if I wouldn't want George Clooney to see me wearing it, out it goes. I'm ruthless.

Parents/Carers who climb on childrens playground equipment chaperoning their child, whilst usually providing an inane running commentary on every action said child does.


Give them some feckin room!


And while you're at it, don't tread on my kids fingers and generally get in the way of the little people who should be at the top of a slide. Dulwich Park is really bad for this. Forty-something mums perched at the top of a slide or clambering elephant like up and down steps designed for under 8 year olds, pushing other kids out of the way whilst shadowing little Alfie. If you need to be with them, they are possibly too young to be on that particular climbing frame/slide? And/or maybe they could introduce a little risk into the childs life and stop wrapping it cotton wool so it grows up able to deal with the real world etc etc.


Same applies to indoor soft play centres and everything is padded!


And breathe.

Keef Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Taking your wife's advise and not doing shots,

> shorts or drugs, and just sticking to pints, only

> to wake up feeling like you've done 10 pills, drunk

> a bottle of sambucca, and been bottled by someone!


Quiet night in then was it Keef?

Those awful audio things at museums - they cause bottlenecks and are totally anti-social. Why bother to go to an exhibition with someone and then not talk or discuss any of the exhibits because you are too busy listening to an audio guide? And what ever happened with actually coming to one's own conclusion about something rather than being spoon-fed one academic viewpoint!

I used one of those audio thingys for the first time this year - it was for the Russian exhibition at the Royal Academy. I definitely got more out of the exhibition and it didn't stop me forming my own opinions. The bonus of audio guides is that you can listen whilst actually looking at the paintings, whereas you obviously need to look away from the painting to read something. I shared a guide with the guy I went with and so we ended up being a lot more touchy feely than we ordinarily would have been (that's another story).


Bottlenecks at museums and galleries are caused by overcrowing. I rarely venture out to museums but would probably go a lot more often if it wasn't for the crowds. I just don't like big crowds of moving people. I liked the audio guide though (sorry Cassius).

Giggirl - try booking a really early slot - I'm usually in by 9.00 when it's not nearly as busy - each to their own re audio guides eh!


Bottlenecks are usually caused by bad planning by the exibition curator - the Terracotta Army was a disgrace, and the V&A have been guilty for some of the worse exhibition planning I have ever seen, both the Art Deco and the Art Nouveau were almost impossible to negotiate.

I like the audio guide things, because usually I can't see to read the tiny little print on the tiny little plaque saying what something is. However, I do agree that it's less social, and you end up in your own little world.


Whilst we're on this subject, getting stuck behind a school party at an exhibition!!!!! Bottle neck to end all bottle necks! :X

Cassius, I just can't handle my culture pre-lunch. I've never given much thought to what causes people-bottlenecks. Years ago, in another life, I used to be invited to lots of private viewings and that was lovely - no crowds and a glass of Moet thrown in. These days I'm put off by anything with big moving crowds. I don't have panic attacks but I definitely get on edge and rather short-fused.


Maybe I will give the early slot a try though. Many many many years ago when my then partner was running a business in NYC, I was left alone all day long and I didn't really know anyone, other than my boyfriend. We stayed on the Upper East Side so I started off each morning with a visit to one of the many museums/galleries on our doorsetp. I would only spend about a half hour, but it was definitely a bonus to see things in small doses rather than spending the whole day.


Those people in the centre of London who give away those nasty so-called newspapers every day; they definitely cause bottlenecks.

giggirl Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> Those people in the centre of London who give away

> those nasty so-called newspapers every day; they

> definitely cause bottlenecks.


And yet they are such wonderful and friendly people! :-D just me?


People calling 5mins before the end of the working day insisting on having a pointless conversation for at least 20mins...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • While it is good that GALA have withdrawn their application for a second weekend, local people and councillors will likely have the same fight on their hands for next year's event. In reading the consultation report, I noted the Council were putting the GALA event in the same light as all the other events that use the park, like the Circus, the Fair and even the FOPR fete. ALL of those events use the common, not the park, and cause nothing like the level of noise and/or disruption of the GALA event. Even the two day Irish Festival (for those that remember that one) was never as noisy as GALA. So there is some disingenuity and hypocrisy from the Council on this, something I wll point out in my response to the report. The other point to note was that in past years branches were cut back for the fencing. Last year the council promised no trees would be cut after pushback, but they seem to now be reverting to a position of 'only in agreement with the council's arbourist'. Is this more hypocrisy from 'green' Southwark who seem to once again be ok with defacing trees for a fence that is up for just days? The people who now own GALA don't live in this area. GALA as an event began in Brockwell Park. It then lost its place there to bigger events (that pesumably could pay Lambeth Council more). One of the then company directors lived on the Rye Hill Estate next to the park and that is likely how Peckham Rye came to be the new choice for the event. That person is no longer involved. Today's GALA company is not the same as the 'We Are the Fair' company that held that first event, not the same in scope, aim or culture. And therein lies the problem. It's not a local community led enterprise, but a commercial one, underwritten by a venture capital company. The same company co-run the Rally Event each year in Southwark Park, which btw is licensed as a one day event only. That does seem to be truer to the original 'We Are the Fair' vision, but how much of that is down to GALA as opoosed to 'Bird on the Wire' (the other group organising it) is hard to say.  For local people, it's three days of not being able to open windows, As someone said above, if a resident set up a PA in their back garden and subjected the neighbours to 10 hours of hard dance music every day for three days, the Council would take action. Do not underestimate how distressing that is for many local residents, many of whom are elderly, frail, young, vulnerable. They deserve more respect than is being shown by those who think it's no big deal. And just to be clear, GALA and the council do not consider there to be a breach of db level if the level is corrected within 15 minutes of the breach. In other words, while db levels are set as part of the noise management plan, there is an acknowledgement that a breach is ok if corrected within 15 minutes. That is just not good enough. Local councillors objected to the proposed extension. 75% of those that responded to the consultation locally did not want GALA 26 to take place at all. For me personally, any goodwill that had been built up through the various consultations over recent years was erased with that application for a second weekend, and especially given that when asked if there were plans for that in post 2025 event feedback meetings (following rumours), GALA lied and said there were no plans to expand. I have come to the conclusion that all the effort to appease on some things is merely an exercise in show, to get past the council's threshold for the events licence. They couldn't give a hoot in reality for local people, and people that genuinely care about parkland, don't litter it with noisy festivals either.   
    • Aria is my go to plumber. Fixed a toilet leak for me at short notice. Reasonably priced and very professional. 
    • Anyone has a storage or a display rack for Albums LPs drop me a message thanks
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...