Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The irony that we've been putting too many people who shouldn't have gone through university through it to service our "knowledge" economy just as the whole kaboodle collapses and what we need to pull us our economic catastrophe are some good old fashioned technichal, engineering and *hush words* manufacturing skills hasn't escaped an old cynic such as myself..

???? Wrote:

what we need to pull us our economic catastrophe are some good old fashioned technichal, engineering and *hush words*

manufacturing skills hasn't escaped an old cynic such as myself..


They are still around Quidsy!..trouble is they are around Sydney,Australia.....Houston,Texas...Toronto,Canada and Wellington,New Zealand.

We have lost 5.5 Million Brits who have emigrated in the last 10 years and,by definition,many of these Guys will be skilled so as to pass the (relatively) stringent criteria to be allowed to emigrate to those Countries in the first place....

Nah, globally the average % of populations working in industry is 32%. We have 23.6%, whereas a heavily industrialised country such as China has 48.6%


Australia has 26.4%, Canada has 28.8%, conversely the US has 19.8%.


Manufacturing generally employs disempowered gophers, not engineers. One engineer can design a machine for 10,000 factories that are made and operated by plebs. Manufacturing delivers efficiencies through proximity to resources or slave labour. In the UK we have neither and so we can't compete.


However, service companies trade on intellectual property, ingenuity and process - at which the Brits are very good. It doesn't need to be close to market, so wehave no increased costs from distance.


Expats like me leave because the UK is populated my miserable gits, it's a shoddy climate and there's too much competition. Not that I don't love you all of course.


By far the overriding influence is the first. We pour scorn on success and whinge tirelessly about our failings. We have no national identity because we have no aspirational values. We don't know our strengths because we lack the imagination to put ourselves in someone else's shoes. We deride our public servants whilst sitting on our fat arses in front of the telly.


I mean, for crissakes, we're scared of our own children.


These are fundamentals, if we get these right then the schools, the hospitals will follow without legislation. Because we're too lazy to do that, we ask the government to provide laws. Pathetic.

Huguenot Wrote:

Expats like me leave because the UK is populated by miserable gits,.....


By far the overriding influence is the first. We pour scorn on success and whinge tirelessly about our failings. We have no national identity because we have no aspirational values. We don't know our strengths because we lack the imagination to put ourselves in someone else's shoes. We deride our public servants whilst sitting on our fat arses in front of the telly. I mean, for crissakes, we're scared of our own children.

These are fundamentals, if we get these right then the schools, the hospitals will follow without legislation. Because we're too lazy to do that, we ask the government to provide laws. Pathetic.


Well,at least,no-one can accuse you of that Huguenot!:)

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Nah, globally the average % of populations working

> in industry is 32%. We have 23.6%, whereas a

> heavily industrialised country such as China has

> 48.6%

>

> Australia has 26.4%, Canada has 28.8%, conversely

> the US has 19.8%.


What about mining and agriculture?

Well, I can't see what percentage of population are working in the armed forces, but as a % of total GDP defence spending is estimated as follows;


UK 2.4%


Australia 2.4%

Canada 1.1%

South Africa 1.7%

US 4.1%


China 4.3%

India 2.5%


Just coz it's military, I though I'd add...


Russia 3.9%


Interesting that it's the three 'superpowers' that spend the most on the military, almost as if their size has made them more, not less paranoid.


However, since this thread is about Education, percentage of GDP spent on education...


UK 5.6%

Australia 4.5%

Canada 5.2%

South Africa 5.4%

US 5.3%


China 1.9%

India 3.2%

Russia 3.8%


So we certainly care enough about our kiddies to pay for their education.


Some high performing countries in education do spend a little more - Finland 6.4%. However other top scorers such as Japan and Singapore spend siginficantly less: 3.5% and 3.7% respectively. It only goes to show that throwing cash at a problem isn't the solution.

Except in Finland. So investing large sums isn't always the answer.


I quite like macroban's idea of mixed schools but single sex alternate years. The bureaucracy involved might intially be tricky but it might solve the traditional dilemmas of educational attainment and social integration.


I think to come out of an all-boys school after 7 years and be anything less than a social leper around woman is a good achievement. Those without sisters would struggle even more I would offer.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Amazing. Now could you cut and paste an AI summary of the defence case for Andrew M-W? 
    • I would like to understand this promise by the Greens in greater detail and how it applies locally? Presumably road/pavement upkeep and renewal is as important for cyclists and pedestrians as motorists? I am not aware of plans to build new roads locally but there has been plenty of money spent on converting roads into pedestrian only areas. On the face of it this feels a slightly empty statement, when applied at local level. I'd love to know the Greens stance in hiring out parks for private use (given impact on park environment), I'd also like to understand their stance on fireworks- I will look to see if I can find anything. I don't know if a manifesto exists under the documents section of Southwark Greens, but you can only access that bit by signing in- which is disappointing. If anyone has a manifesto that reflects local priorities- could they post a link?
    • You are most likely correct in thinking that  Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew it.  But they obviously thought that his skills, abilities and usefulness far outweighed the negatives. Here is a summary of the positives lifted from elsewhere:-   1. Strategic Architect: He was a primary architect of "New Labour," rebranding the party and shifting its core ideology to win the 1997 general election. 2 Master of Communication: Often called the original "spin doctor," he revolutionised how political parties manage the media. He famously created the "grid" system to coordinate government messaging. 3 Networking and Charm: Known as "Silvertongue," he possesses a peerless ability to charm and network with high-level global figures, including business leaders and heads of state. 4. Governance and Trade Expertise: Beyond strategy, he was considered a highly efficient minister, serving as European Commissioner for Trade and Secretary of State across multiple departments, including Business and Northern Ireland.  5. Reinvention: His capacity to adapt to changing political climates and rebuild relationships reflects personal resilience and strategic flexibility. With his skill and abilities, he delivered results for all his bosses. In the short time in Washington, he found a way to get on the right side of Trump - despite him  being critical of Trump in previous years. That said he is complex personality.  He can be simultaneously brilliant and arrogant, thick-skinned yet sensitive, and selfless for his party while appearing narcissistic in his personal dealings.  My OP asked if he would be accepted over the pond. It turned out he was because he got on famously with trump. He worked out the correct strategy to get on the good side of Trump and secured a better trade deal than the EU and other nations.    
    • Malumbu, do you happen to know what the current figure is for "trips into town made by walking, cycling and public transport"? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...