Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Would love people's thoughts on this...currently struggling, as many are with the London property market. Had resigned ourselves to being unable to afford a house in ED as many others have done despite renting in the area for a long time. Today viewed a house in The Catford side of Forest Hill, nice street but not alot around- pubs, shops etc. Then viewed a very large 3 bed flat above commercial premises in ED which offers everything a house would but with an affordable price tag...But it's a flat. Would you a)hold on to the dream of having an actual house in a potentially up and coming area or go for the flat with everything on your doorstep?
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/41564-house-v-flat/
Share on other sites

The big problem with flats is the leasehold (unless you get a share of the leaseholding company as well). I find leaseholds restrictive and annoying, so personally, if it is feasible, I'd hold out for the house.


But, on the other hand, prices are on the up, so waiting may be a bad thing.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/41564-house-v-flat/#findComment-722997
Share on other sites

I have lived most of my adult life (over 30 years now) in flats. Much of this was spent in Edinburgh where a large part of the Georgian/Victorian housing stock are purpose built flats, NOT converted. In Edinburgh living in a flat wasn't seen as particularly different to living in a house - a large, well proportioned flat, often with communal gardens or private parks, was seen as 'just as good' and people bring up their families there quite happily. Edinburgh went through an intense housing boom through the Georgian era and flats seemed to be the best way around the scarcity of land. I find the desire to have one's own 'house' above everything to be strange - I now live in a 1000 sq. ft. flat on Peckham Rye which is bigger and has a far more spacious feel than many of the little terraced houses I viewed that I could afford.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/41564-house-v-flat/#findComment-723038
Share on other sites

This flat is big, over 1300 sq ft and while the negative side to buying over commercial premises is that it's trickier to get a mortgage and not freehold, a positive is that for the majority of the time you are actually at home and not at work you don't have neighbours above or below (if the shop is open regular business hours), so no potential of having loud music from neighbours blaring in at 3am....and vice versa, not having to worry if its you playing music at 3am!

Just worried about re-sale.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/41564-house-v-flat/#findComment-723079
Share on other sites

Buy the flat as it sounds like it will give you everything you need. Flat conversions often aren't great but large flats are wonderful. I agree with PeckhamRye. A house isn't the be all and end all. I know lots of people who happily choose to live in large flats rather than houses. Its quite normal really in most big cities.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/41564-house-v-flat/#findComment-723263
Share on other sites

My first thing would be to check how long the shop below has been there and what the likelihood of this remaining a shop as opposed to turning into a bar etc is. I agree in that freehold is a much better option and insurance too above a commercial premises can be tricky, That said, then it really boils down to your gut feeling once all is explored and as they say location location location!!
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/41564-house-v-flat/#findComment-723559
Share on other sites

Seconding this v sensible and concise advice. Managing to happily bring up two kids in a two-bedroom flat. Ideally of course we'd like more space, BUT its certainly not worth dicing with overstretching! Sure the anxiety would override the benefits.



Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Buy what you can afford and where you'll be

> happiest but never overstretch yourself.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/41564-house-v-flat/#findComment-724045
Share on other sites

Thanks for all the words of wisdom everyone, gave me a lot of food for thought. It seems it really is location, location, location- offered 20k over asking price it went north of 50k over (!) we just weren't prepared to stretch ourselves that much for it so clearly it wasn't meant to be....back to the drawing board.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/41564-house-v-flat/#findComment-724833
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Morally they should, but we don't actually vote for parties in our electoral system. We vote for a parliamentary (or council) representative. That candidates group together under party unbrellas is irrelevant. We have a 'representative' democracy, not a party political one (if that makes sense). That's where I am on things at the moment. Reform are knocking on the door of the BNP, and using wedge issues to bait emotional rage. The Greens are knocking on the door of the hard left, sweeping up the Corbynista idealists. But it's worth saying that both are only ascending because of the failures of the two main parties and the successive governments they have led. Large parts of the country have been left in economic decline for decades, while city fat cats became uber wealthy. Young people have been screwed over by student loans. Housing is 40 years of commoditisation, removing affordabilty beyond the reach of too many. Decently paid, secure jobs, seem to be a thing of the past. Which of the main parties can people turn to, to fix any of these things, when the main parties are the reason for the mess that has been allowed to evolve? Reform certainly aren't the answer to those things. The Greens may aspire to do something meaningful about some of them, but where will they find the money to pay for it? None of it's easy.
    • Yes, but the context is important and the reason.
    • That messes up Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland - democracy being based on citizenship not literacy. There's intentionally no one language that campaign materials have to be in. 
    • TBH if people don't see what is sectarian in the materials linked to above when they read about them, then I don't think me going on about it will help. They speak for themselves.  I don't know how the Greens can justify promising to be a strong voice for one particular religion. Will that pledge hold when it comes to campaigning in East Dulwich (which is majority atheist)? https://censusdata.uk/e02000836-east-dulwich/ts030-religion
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...