Jump to content

Recommended Posts

AcedOut Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> macker - No mention of JP Morgan, Citigroup,

> Barclays? They all have large IB operations too.

>

> As for size - it depends on how you measure it.

> Capitalisation, employees, revenue, profit?


From what I have read I think they are considered to be much more sound than the pure investment banks because they have a solid base of retail deposits too.


Goldmans and Morgan Stanley seem to be considered to have been more cautious than Lehmans, so may yet survive.

This is indeed somewhat corrct - the less ambitious banks that concentrate on day to day bread & butter biz will always have a place - safest bank in the UK at the minute ?


the Co-op


Its not very glam,but has a conscience and you may do some good by hoying yer ill gotten gains in there

The Federal Reserve have given a $85 billion loan to AIG. I suppose the problem with AIG going under is the fact that it is an insurance company and would effect millions of insurance policies.


With regards to all the anti-Goldman Sachs sentiment - you don't want to see any bank go under as it has far reaching ramifications well beyond the smug 30,000 people it would leave unemployed.

Floating Onion Wrote:

American Internation Group, insurance, not investment banking. They should be ok for now,

but if they went the knock on effects would be huge.


Indeed! They are the logo on Man United's kit!

No logo= No Sponsor. No Sponsor-No Funds.

No Funds-eventual relegation and ultimately bankrupty.

No Man United-English Premiership rapidly goes downhill.

Other Clubs naturally fold due to lack of interest-whole pack of Clubs forced to closed and finally the whole League shuts down after 140 years.

Nation in uproar.Riots ensue in the street.

Houses of Parliament and 10.Downing Street burned down.

Anarchy in THe UK.

Sex Pistols,thus,have no option but to reform to restore a semblance of order with Johny Rotten becoming Prime Minister and Sid Vicious becoming Chancellor Of The Exchequer from beyond the grave....and all because of bleedin' A.I.G.:X

True, most people in the city have some degree of contempt for Goldmans as an organisation... but still, same applies as with Lehmans. The majority of the employees are not high earning traders, a lot of them are on a fairly ordinary income, and I don't believe people *really* want to see others out of work... anyway, they're still actually making a profit as far as I know, so it's a moot point.

I completely disagree with the comments about Goldman. They are just exceptionally good at what they do and truly have the best talent working there. I can say that fairly good authority. They have been hit also (profits down 70%), but had the hindsight to take a big bet against credit spreads before the big collapse. They are typically highly regarded by their competitors. However, in this climate, anything can happen, so no IB is safe at the moment.


What we may see now though is the remaining IB-only banks merging with retail banks, such that they can offer lending facilities and more diversification.


As for insurance companies - disaster will strike if the monoline's go under or get downgraded. These are the insurance companies that back many of the financial contracts.



I see it the other way Aced...It was the repeal of the Glass-Steagall act in 99(?) which allowed retail and investment banks to exist in the same corporation, that has partly led us to where we are today. I can see banks being forced to choose to be one or the other

When did lloyds fold like a pack of cards again?


I'm afraid that without the insurance business your holiday rum stolen by Miami airport baggage handlers ain't getting replaced, noone would risk shipping all that precious oil, gas and food to Britain and you couldn't legally drive your car and absolutely noone could fly stranded XL passengers home, so not sure why the thought of AIG going tits up or lloyds 'folding' would be so welcome.


Plus, if you fold your cards doesn't that make them really hard to deal or to get back in the box?

I've no issue with folding a bad hand, or even falling like a house of cards, just why would you go about folding a pack of them?! Except when you keep losing and you want to spoil everyone's fun.

I've done the same with monopoly boards in the past, that's for sure.

Barcap put in an offer yesterday, so perhaps something will be saved. Although I'd guess most of Snorky's clerical 9-5ers won't be top of the list.


Also, Credit Suisse has created an open forum for all Lehman's staff to walk in and drop off CVs, and if taken on they'll be guaranteed the same salary as before and 75% of last year's bonus. Clever cherry-picking.


AcedOut, not sure if someone's got to this already but I think macker meant institutions that are IBs only.

SteveT Wrote:

- They are gathering together to try to maintain

> confidence, as if collectively they all seem a

> sound proposition.>

> It smacks of Lloyds insurers folding like a pack

> of cards a few years ago.


I hope you don't mind constructive criticism SteveT but this is not one of your better efforts.

It barely rhymes at all,quite frankly.:(

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • was the price not displayed on the menu?
    • It has come to this author’s attention that the world of 4+ admissions — that most enigmatic of educational rites — continues to bewilder even the most composed of parents. Fear not. For in a former life, I was not merely a humble observer, but a seasoned educator of over twenty years, and Head of Pre-Prep for a distinguished dozen. Now, with quill exchanged for touchscreen, I have taken to that most modern of salons — Instagram — to dispense guidance, answer frequently whispered questions, and illuminate the shadowy corners of school selection with clarity and calm. Each post bears my signature twist: a blend of insight, levity, and the occasional raised eyebrow. Should you find yourself adrift in the sea of admissions, I suggest you peruse my latest dispatch. It may well be the lifeline you seek. The Delicate Dilemma of the Summer-born 4+ Scholars Yours in solidarity and scholastic savvy, Lord Pencilton  🎩✏️
    • Perhaps Gooseygreeny was not familiar with the wildlife before Gala was imposed on the park, since when its value to wildlife has deteriorated. The Park had never been disturbed before, as the council had respected it as a Site of Importance for Nature Conservation, so only the Common was licensed by them as a site for events. The first time Gala held their event, there was a tree with woodpeckers nesting in it right in the middle of the main field they used and thrushes, blackbirds and great tits nesting within the shrubs and trees immediately surrounding the field. The woodpeckers were thriving on ants from the anthills in the grass. To those of us who used to enjoy watching the wildlife, it was very obviously a Site of Importance for a variety of birds. Despite being accessed by the public and their dogs, it had been relatively undisturbed,  which was one of the main reasons why it was so special and why I have been opposed to the Gala festival being held during the bird nesting season.
    • So dangerous!    Can you be more specific about the road this was in and when you report it?  Maybe there’s some CCTV footage available
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...