Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Apparently someone got off the 197 bus around 3:30pm walked in front of the bus, got hit by a passing car, flew over the bonnet and was then dragged under another car. He was taken away in an ambulance according to my source, so lets hope he is going to be ok.

Nero Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> That sounds horrid. And that's why I wait for the

> green man and try to cross at a zebra. I see mums

> with prams and kids in tow scurrying across LL and

> I think 'why not just go to the crossing?'.


Although if the accident was near the Harvester, as opposed to the Plough, that junction has no pedestrian crossings. To get from the Harvester to Cox's Walk on other side of the road safely, you'd have to walk a couple of hundred metres to the crossing beyond Melford Road and then walk another few hundred metres back the way to the crossing near Underhill Road and then back down the road again. And you'd still have had to cross two roads without the benefit of a green man. I can see why someone just crossed here. Further down LL where there are numerous crossings, it's harder to excuse - especially where kids are around.


I'm guessing traffic flow on the South Circular is why the junction doesn't have any pedestrian features that allow pedestrians to fully cross a road. If you know the sequencing, you can just about time it to cross to the traffic light 'island' and wait but it's definitely not a pedestrian friendly area.

I did notice a certain disturbance up my end today and wondered briefly what it was, but not urgently enough to stumble to the window*.


Applespider makes a useful point, however. Although I've crossed there every week for a year and not got dead yet, it's a particularly murderous junction. Since at least February, it's been on the map of 'sites without pedestrian phases', marked as requiring modernization, suggesting TfL might be going to do something about it.


I am pessimistic. The reason for this pessimism is that the Grove** junction used, until fairly recently, to have a pedestrian phase (a fraction of a minute in which all the vehicles were supposed to be stopped), but this has vanished. Turning the phasings back, and possibly upsetting the more infanticidal motorist, is presumably an option, but clearly not their favourite, so they put it on a map instead.


Blinkered optimists might thing that being on the map is a good thing. But there are 140 other junctions on the map, all of them against the Department of Transport's guidelines. And, although TfL were very keen about compliance, they were only this bold:


Our next step is to develop a framework for selecting which of these should be prioritised for review. This will be based on an analysis of pedestrian accidents at these junctions, current traffic volumes and consideration of what effect providing a pedestrian phase would have on traffic operations and congestion on the road network and how this might be mitigated. This information will be made available in spring 2008.


Forgive me if I'm wrong, but that's not three steps from fixing anything. That's just about working out how to work out which ones are going to get on the list they'll be having a think about considering. Naturally, no such report has emerged (see here), and frameworks still butter no parsnips.


If I had a conscience, I might think of stirring TfL with some sort of campaign, but I'm allergic to futility and have seen enough vacuous boilerplate to last a lifetime. I have no objection, however, to any bright young optimists following this up. Not, if my experience of bright young optimists is anything to go by, that they will.



*None of the following is about buses or Crystal Palace Road. If you don't like it, skip it.

**The Grove is the large and proper pub that lent its name to the junction and is currently being forced to masquerade as a peeling 'Harvester'.

Many years ago there was a campaign to get a green man phase on these lights, This stemed from the local community and went to Southwark's Traffic Management Section. They tried to get something implimented but because road came under (then) Ministry of Transport and was being designated a 'red route' they were not interested.

Suggest that our MP should take it up again or Boris.

I walked past this incident yesterday evening around 6pm and spoke to a senior officer who was getting a bar of chocolate in one of the shops opposite and he said it was a man of around 40 who'd gotten run over. It looked very bad and he didn't think the guy would make it.


How many more road accidents at this junction will it take before something is done about it?

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I walked past this incident yesterday evening

> around 6pm and spoke to a senior officer who was

> getting a bar of chocolate in one of the shops.....


I hope he wasn't in uniform. (6)

There was another accident there a few months ago, even if there was a crossing there people are to lazy to walk to a safe place to cross, also I am amazed the amount of people that run from the other side of the road infront of buses because they missed them.

Horsebox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jah Lush Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I walked past this incident yesterday evening

> > around 6pm and spoke to a senior officer who

> was

> > getting a bar of chocolate in one of the

> shops.....

>

> I hope he wasn't in uniform. (6)



Maybe he was on duty and he was diabetic and forgot his sweets and didn't have a change of clothes with him...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Girls In Your City - No Selfie - Anonymous Casual Dating https://SecreLocal.com [url=https://SecreLocal.com] Girls In Your City [/url] - Anonymous Casual Dating - No Selfie New Girls [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/molly-15.html]Molly[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/cheryl-blossom-48.html]Cheryl Blossom[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/carola-conymegan-116.html]Carola Conymegan[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/pupa-41.html]Pupa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/mia-candy-43.html]Mia Candy[/url]
    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
    • Revealing of what, exactly? I resurrected this thread, after a year, to highlight the foolishness of the OP’s op. And how posturing would be sagacity is quickly undermined by events, dear boy, events. The thread is about Mandelson. I knew he was a wrong ‘un all along, we all did; the Epstein shit just proves it. In reality, Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew as well but accepted it, because they found him useful. As did a large proportion of the 2024 intake of Labour MPs who were personally vetted and approved by Mandelson.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...