Jump to content

Recommended Posts

It is my 2yo's birthday in a couple of weeks and I'm planning on getting him either a scooter or a balance bike. Does anyone have any thoughts on which would be best? He has a little scuttlebug which he likes going down hills very fast on, so I suspect whatever I get him will be terrifying but I guess that just comes with the territory. All words of wisdom gratefully received.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/42428-scooter-or-balance-bike/
Share on other sites

Hmm, I guess mostly just for pootling about the park. He has a baby brother so we can't ditch the buggy completely and he's not really big on obeying instructions at the moment so I think scooter on the roads would be really stressful. Maybe a balance bike at first then. Thank you.

Bear in mind you will end up carrying both your son and his new wheels (whatever they are) for a good proportion of the time.


Toddlers walk slowly and can't go very far - balance bikes are good but they reduce speed and range whereas a scooter does the opposite.


Has to be scooter...

My two both got the hang of scooters much more quickly than balance bikes - they were both off on scooters before they were two, balance biking still not there for my now three year old. Scooters much easier to carry/pull them along on too. I would only go out with the balance bike when my husband was around when my eldest was younger - I have a horrific memory of baby in sling, pram, balance bike and a toddler all screaming and trying to get home from the park!

Learning to scoot seems to be quicker than riding the BB. I bought a BB last June for a second birthday and it's only really coming out regularly now. Having said that I'm happy that she can't go that fast on it yet, so she has stayed close to me and the buggy. I get the feeling that is changing tho.?

I only let her out on the BB for short journeys unless both of us (parents) are there.


It is fun watching her learn tho, it does feel likeshe is learning a skill.

I think it might depend on what he/she takes to, too. My first child didn't go for a scooter really and just really took to a balance bike - we got a very light metal one so not too hassley for carrying. It hung on the buggy well. My second child has been on a scooter from about 18months - just took to it! He's two now and totally reliable on the scooter. My four-year old is only just getting the hang of the scooter really and has not got the same staying power on it. He was ace on the balance bike and would go for ages without tiring. Can you trial both and see if there's any incling either way?
Thank you so much everyone. Lots to think about. I think I'm leaning towards a scooter now for portability. His much worshipped older cousin has one so I suspect he'll be quite motivated to get to grips with it. Expect we'll end up with both eventually though. Thanks everyone. I can always rely on the family room for advice.

Have had the opposite experience to most of the posters. Our son (at age 2.5) took to his BB immediately but still can't scoot. We bought his from Bon Velo in Herne Hill and I gulped at the price (think it's was about ?110) but they assured me that it would be worth it. The main positive is that it is made from aluminium so will actually rest on the top of the umbrella pushchair when I'm taking him and his sister to the park. It is also much easier for him to steer. The average toddler doesn't have a great deal of upper body strength so find it hard to control heavy wooden or steel bikes.

I guess that the short answer is that it depends on how much you want to spend. You can get an excellent scooter for ?60 but have to pay almost double that for a similar BB. The advantage of the latter is that it's meant to leapfrog stabilisers as it's harder to learn how to balance than pedal.

Am sure your toddler will be thrilled by the Scuttlebug upgrade!

We bought a scooter for my son's 2nd birthday which he immediately took to, bought a balance bike for his 3rd birthday which he ignored in favour of his scooter and now have just bought a bike for his 5th birthday. As other posters have said, the scooter was great for portability and distance scootable. Was concerned would take a longer amount of time to master 'proper' biking without mastering the balance bike. As it turned out my son was up and peddling confidently on his bike an hour or two after receiving it on his birthday. We didn't use stabilizers at all.
Balance bikes are amazing and much better in terms of transition to proper cycling. Our 4 year old got off his balance bike a month ago and got onto a "big boys" bike without stabilisers. Promptly cycled all around P Rye park without falling off or even that looking likley. He has gone from the BB to proper cycling without any stress whatsoever. Get one!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Post much better this Xmas.  Sue posted about whether they send Xmas cards; how good the post is,  is relevant.  Think I will continue to stay off Instagram!
    • These have reduced over the years, are "perfect" lives Round Robins being replaced by "perfect" lives Instagram posts where we see all year round how people portray their perfect lives ?    The point of this thread is that for the last few years, due to issues at the mail offices, we had delays to post over Christmas. Not really been flagged as an issue this year but I am still betting on the odd card, posted well before Christmas, arriving late January. 
    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
    • Why have I got a feeling there was also a connection with the beehive in Brixton on that road next to the gym
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...