Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I disagree Otta/SJ, if you work for a company in a public facing role, you're representing the company. Yeah your complaint won't be formally processed, but you would expect such a staff member to be able to feed back general customer sentiment back to management. But of course, there's no call for any rudeness/aggression.

Hmm, in my book they should point people towards the customer service desk and that's it.


But what do people expect to acheive by complaining (even politely) to these guys?


I'm sure they mention to their line managers that a load of people were giving them verbal, and I'm sure that acheives nothing.

again, this isn't like a bank where front line staff deal with a queue of people, some of whom wish to complain


it's an tidal wave of people getting off a train, overly annoyed, and taking it out on people who can't do anything about it


You can see it yourself when it's happening


And on a day like yesterday when it's incessant, these people are doing an amazing job by just not retaliating IMO

Not suggesting anyone starts "taking it out on" the staff. Certainly not.


If the station staff points the customer in the right direction should they wish to complain... well surely that's fine, and actually would go to show that approaching them did acheive something...

If you're going to privatise trains and run them for profit like a business, your staff should behave like people who work for any other business. I.e. they should be helpful and sympathetic towards complaints. When we pay the highest fares in Europe, I should think so too!


In my experience I have found Southern Trains staff to be ill-informed, unhelpful and on occasions, downright rude and incompetent. However I don't think it's their fault. It's symptomatic of bad management from the top downwards.

", your staff should behave like people who work for any other business. I.e. they should be helpful and sympathetic towards complaints"


gee, could you point me towards some of these businesses?


I would say most companies (there are notable exceptions) are desperately poor at complaint handling

I've noticed that the Southern Trains staff under 40 tend to be perfectly pleasant and willing (and reasonably well informed if you take into account what their particular job is) - it's the older one's who think the world owes them a living. I assume they earn similar amounts.


By the way, from the Southern website, a clear expectation that you may speak directly to the frontline staff:

"Our staff will do all they can to resolve the problem straight away. If this is not possible, they will provide you with details of how to contact Customer Services."

I complained to one member of station staff a few weeks ago, and politely asked why my train was late. She shrugged her shoulders and sipped her hot drink by the turnstile heater whilst I shivered in the cold. I then asked her to get the station manager. She said no, I asked why not, she shrugged her shoulders, smiled and carried on sipping her drink.


The daily problems are not acts of God.

We all sympathise with front line staff who are inundated with complaints, and I'm sure we all agree rudeness and aggressiveness are out of line. But surely ad hoc complaints to front line staff are a pretty decent barometer of what's ticking your customers off at any given time? And I'm sure these staff are given oodles of complaint handling training (it sounds like the woman above has executed this to perfection!).

I have used LB station recently (I don't normally) on a number of occasions (coming in from Forest Hill, Honor Oak, Brockley way - so avoiding the nightmare platforms) and out of rush hour - the station staff have been admirably helpful and polite, but I wasn't travelling in rush hour and I wasn't stressed myself. I suspect passenger stress starts to rub-off on staff - and if you've had a rude experience you don't know how much grief the staff member has had before your interaction. These things often become viscious spirals, as stress breeds stress.


Which is not to say that, given the obvious and increasing problems, management shouldn't have taken action to get more staff out there to help pasengers. When we had our tame Railway Senior Mananger on the forum this could have been dealt with far more effectively.

I have no idea, I wasn't there, and my comments were general not specific to yesterday.


But yes, I imagine there were some tools throwing pointless abuse around.


Could I please put a 'no' vote in for the Denmark Hill revamp?


StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ad hoc complaints maybe

>

> but yesterday morning, you think it was an

> occasional, ad-hoc complaint, politely addressed

> to the staff?

London Bridge used to have 19 platforms. They closed 3 to make room for the signalling box and staff car parking in the 1970's. They closed 3 more at the start of all these works (which also killed amongst other services the SLL). So clearly if they needed 16 platforms before and are trying to run services with 3 less platforms and at the end of all this will only have 15 platforms then they obviously create a near impossible operational conundrum.


Have you noticed how British Transport Police are now hanging around to discourage passengers anger. The cattle pens. The narrow platforms. Not welcoming.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Or increase tax.  The freezing of personal allowances is one way, not what I would choose.  On principle I don't care if the rich immigrate.  The main parties could have been more honest before the election.  Reform is deluded.
    • I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...