Jump to content

Recommended Posts

MadWorld74 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Me! Because I'm such a bad speller and I'm so

> non-discript in my postings.


I'm sure those things will be taken into consideration.

In the meantime, do you have a hat? And do you require a comfort break?

I have many hats and I'm always up for a comfort break.


Now kind people, this is all a bit cliquey, don't you think?


I mean it's the same people nominating their pals for the 'award' and it can be a little alienating for those of us who are not in the inner sanctum.


Just an observation.


I'm going out to the garden to get in my Anderson shelter, for I'm sure there's an EDF Doodlebug coming with my name on it's nose.

Madworld


I'll not make any claims for it being a good idea or anything and it might die on it's arse - BUT when you say




I though I had addressed that earlier in the thread? I started it because someone I had never met, never PM's, have no connection with AT ALL, who has posted occasionally, suddenly started posting these delightful little episodes. I thought that was great. Can you please explain to me how that is any evidence of an "inner sanctum" or "pals" getting together?


Put it another way - if several of the posters on this thread post a lot, but many of whom have never met, can post with grace and wit, why is it that someone I HAVE met, and usually seems happy enough to meet, endlessly talks of alienation and inner sanctums?


What are your thoughts on Ted's posts? is there someone else you think people overlook and want to nominate? Join in if you like, don't if you don't - but why knock those that do - especially with made up falsehoods, and then calling it an "observation"?

Moos Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> For the record, I've never met Giggirl and have no

> idea who she is.


I've never met Giggirl either, though I did once offer her a part in an imaginary film I was pretending to make.

It was a non-existent co-lead role, too.

Moos Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> HB, you are my favourite flavour of pencil.

>

> What did GigGirl have to imaginarily do to get the

> imaginary part? Or are you leaving that to..


Why Moos what a nice compliment.

A chance remark on a lost wallet thread some time back led to the idea being mooted about the time I found a wallet belonging to an ice cream magnate. We bacame firm friends and I ended up marrying his top international model sister.

There was talk of Clooney for the role of me, and Giggirl was all set for the part of my top international model wife.

Sadly the imaginary backers turned out to be the worst sort of scoundrels imaginable and ran off with the counterfeit money.

Even now my pretend lawyers are trying to trace them with a view to serving cigarette papers on them.

Still, that's the imaginary film business for you.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Rant ahead: You're not one of them but unfortunately, there's a substrate of posters here that do very little except moan and come up with weird conspiracy theories. They're immediately highly critical of just about any change, and their initial assumption is that everyone else is a total fucking contemptible idiot. For example: don't you think that the people who run the libraries will have considered the impact of timing of reconstruction on library users? (In fact, we know they have - because they've made arrangements at other libraries to attempt to mitigate the disruption). After all, these are the people that spend their whole working week thinking about libraries and dealing with library users (and the kids especially). You don't go into the library game for the chicks and fame - so it's fair to assume that librarians are committed to public service and public access to libraries, including by kids. Likewise the built environment people (engineers, architects, construction managers, project managers, construction contractors, subcontractors or whoever is on this job) are told to minimise disruption on every job they do. The thing that occurs to us as amateurs within 30 seconds of us seeing something is probably not something a full time professional hasn't thought about! Southwark Council, the NHS, TfL, Dulwich Estate, Thames Water, Openreach - they're not SPECTRE factories filled with malevolent chaosmongers trying to persecute anyone. They're mostly filled with people who understand their job and try to do their best with what they've been given - just like all of us. Nobody is perfect or immune from challenge, and that's fair enough, but why not at least start from the assumption that there's a good reason why things have been done the way they have? Any normal person would be pleased that their busy, pretty, lively local library is getting refurbished, and will have more space and facilities for kids and teens, and will be more efficient to run and warmer in winter. But no, EDT_Forumite_752 had kids who did an exam 20 years ago, and this makes them an expert on library refurbishment who can see it's all just stuff and nonsense for the green agenda and why can't it all be put off... 😡😡😡
    • I completely misread the previous post, sorry. For some reason I thought the mini cooper was also a police vehicle, DUH.
    • This has given me ideas for the ginger wine I love, that no one else likes!      
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...