Jump to content

Recommended Posts

That's hillarious!!! have you seen the rich kids from the 'village'hanging out on the streets trying to talk like the kids from Peckham. The boys even had bling trainers on!!! ha ha, expect the thing is on closer inspection all the girls had designer labells like Gucci and Prada, whereas the Peckham crew had the knock offs. There's nothing funnier than a soon to be white IT girl' trying to kiss her teeth and say 'you no whaimean innit' as she slurps her chilled bottle of Chardonnay from Daddy's collection. Brilliance.

Dear Louisiana,


"No, but I have heard there is in Dulwich a certain lane not unconnected with certain practices indulged in by a famous footballer".


Surely you are not saying that famous footballers are (cough) "dogging" on Court Lane?


What filth! I suppose Court Lane is filled with riff raf and new money - what should we expect?

Is this the incident when Stanley got his todger out for the doggers? Good for him, I thought, and all he has to do now is tell the tabloids to f**k off and mind their own business. What does he do next? Offers up some ridiculous grovelling public apology saying how terrible and regretful his behaviour was. Made me want to puke. If he thought it was a cool thing to do, why be a complete hypocrite and flaggelate himself in public a couple of days later just because he got caught out?

dulwichmum Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Dear Louisiana,

>

> "No, but I have heard there is in Dulwich a

> certain lane not unconnected with certain

> practices indulged in by a famous footballer".

>

> Surely you are not saying that famous footballers

> are (cough) "dogging" on Court Lane?


No no, not Court Lane. Somewhat further up the hill, beyond the toll.

In the name of God Louisiana, do not tantalise me so, now you are talking serious gossip. Many of the parents from my sons class live up there! Please, please do not keep me in suspense! Do you mean that 1970's estate opposite Sydenham Hill train station?


And pray dear cyber chum - how do you know this - you suacey minx!

I remember there being rumours of witchcraft and devil worship in Dulwich/Sydenham woods, but it was probably bo!!ocks. Also, was on the bus with Mrs Keef last year, and heard a very well spoken woman chatting to her friend about the 'dogging' session she'd attended in Dulwich with her husband... We couldn't believe what we were hearing!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Morally they should, but we don't actually vote for parties in our electoral system. We vote for a parliamentary (or council) representative. That candidates group together under party unbrellas is irrelevant. We have a 'representative' democracy, not a party political one (if that makes sense). That's where I am on things at the moment. Reform are knocking on the door of the BNP, and using wedge issues to bait emotional rage. The Greens are knocking on the door of the hard left, sweeping up the Corbynista idealists. But it's worth saying that both are only ascending because of the failures of the two main parties and the successive governments they have led. Large parts of the country have been left in economic decline for decades, while city fat cats became uber wealthy. Young people have been screwed over by student loans. Housing is 40 years of commoditisation, removing affordabilty beyond the reach of too many. Decently paid, secure jobs, seem to be a thing of the past. Which of the main parties can people turn to, to fix any of these things, when the main parties are the reason for the mess that has been allowed to evolve? Reform certainly aren't the answer to those things. The Greens may aspire to do something meaningful about some of them, but where will they find the money to pay for it? None of it's easy.
    • Yes, but the context is important and the reason.
    • That messes up Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland - democracy being based on citizenship not literacy. There's intentionally no one language that campaign materials have to be in. 
    • TBH if people don't see what is sectarian in the materials linked to above when they read about them, then I don't think me going on about it will help. They speak for themselves.  I don't know how the Greens can justify promising to be a strong voice for one particular religion. Will that pledge hold when it comes to campaigning in East Dulwich (which is majority atheist)? https://censusdata.uk/e02000836-east-dulwich/ts030-religion
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...