Jump to content

Recommended Posts

That's hillarious!!! have you seen the rich kids from the 'village'hanging out on the streets trying to talk like the kids from Peckham. The boys even had bling trainers on!!! ha ha, expect the thing is on closer inspection all the girls had designer labells like Gucci and Prada, whereas the Peckham crew had the knock offs. There's nothing funnier than a soon to be white IT girl' trying to kiss her teeth and say 'you no whaimean innit' as she slurps her chilled bottle of Chardonnay from Daddy's collection. Brilliance.

Dear Louisiana,


"No, but I have heard there is in Dulwich a certain lane not unconnected with certain practices indulged in by a famous footballer".


Surely you are not saying that famous footballers are (cough) "dogging" on Court Lane?


What filth! I suppose Court Lane is filled with riff raf and new money - what should we expect?

Is this the incident when Stanley got his todger out for the doggers? Good for him, I thought, and all he has to do now is tell the tabloids to f**k off and mind their own business. What does he do next? Offers up some ridiculous grovelling public apology saying how terrible and regretful his behaviour was. Made me want to puke. If he thought it was a cool thing to do, why be a complete hypocrite and flaggelate himself in public a couple of days later just because he got caught out?

dulwichmum Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Dear Louisiana,

>

> "No, but I have heard there is in Dulwich a

> certain lane not unconnected with certain

> practices indulged in by a famous footballer".

>

> Surely you are not saying that famous footballers

> are (cough) "dogging" on Court Lane?


No no, not Court Lane. Somewhat further up the hill, beyond the toll.

In the name of God Louisiana, do not tantalise me so, now you are talking serious gossip. Many of the parents from my sons class live up there! Please, please do not keep me in suspense! Do you mean that 1970's estate opposite Sydenham Hill train station?


And pray dear cyber chum - how do you know this - you suacey minx!

I remember there being rumours of witchcraft and devil worship in Dulwich/Sydenham woods, but it was probably bo!!ocks. Also, was on the bus with Mrs Keef last year, and heard a very well spoken woman chatting to her friend about the 'dogging' session she'd attended in Dulwich with her husband... We couldn't believe what we were hearing!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
    • To be fair we are as hosed as the majority of other countries post-Covid. The problem is Labour promised way too much and leant in on the we need change and we will deliver it and it was clear to anyone with a modicum of sense that no change was going to happen quickly and actually taking the reigns may have been a massive poison- chalice. As Labour are finding to their cost - there are no easy answers.  A wealth tax seems straightforward but look how Labour have U-turned on elements of non-dom - why? Because the super rich started leaving the country in their droves and whilst we all may want them to pay more tax they already pay a big chunk already and the government saw there was a problem.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...