Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Well, it is buggy as hell, and in my experience, the worst on-demand service I have ever used.


But the content is fantastic, albeit in fuzzy vision.


I recently had a Peep show marathon, having only seen the latest series and was in telly heaven!


If they fixed the interface and upped the rez I would be a regular user, as it is, accessing the various underground libraries out there is less hassle and easier on the eyes to boot.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/4313-4od/#findComment-138117
Share on other sites

Annasfield Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Don't watch telly. Excuse my ignorance.



At this stage I feel I should say I was joking before David is labelled as a boob obsessed perv*. Peep show is a funny sitcom, not a boob programme.


* More so than the average bloke that is.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/4313-4od/#findComment-138288
Share on other sites

flappers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I don't get Peep Show , would someone like to tell

> me why so many people think it's funny ? :)


Because it's realy, realy funny. It's got this guy right and he?s like all overly neurotic middle class but also a complete looser. He shares a shitty little flat with this friend of his who is also a neurotic looser but somehow like completely narcissistic. They end up in these uncomfortably repressed but often depraved situations. It?s a bit like bumping into your nan at an S&M club.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/4313-4od/#findComment-138468
Share on other sites

I think the BBC offering is the best of the bunch at the moment but still not quite there- at least not via my Wii on a proper telly.


The Ch4 and ITV offerings are just not up to scratch


And I can't see myself ever watching a proper TV shown on a pc screen on a desk. I'll watch 5 minute Youtube clips for sure but MoTD for an hour+???

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/4313-4od/#findComment-138580
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
    • Very sorry to hear this, but surely the landlord is responsible for fixing the electrics?  Surely they must be insured for things like this? I hope you get it all sorted out quickly.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...