Jump to content

Recommended Posts

bon3yard Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Penelope Pitstop. As for the female denizens of

> Bedrock...I'd go with Wilma, but I'd be thinking

> of Betty!



See - there you go! Another tasty female cartoon character. We get Dick Dastardly!! You can tell that it was definitely fellas that used to do all the animation...

Ted Max Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Aladdin could surely feature in Lisa Simpson's

> "Unthreatening Boys" calendar? You'd have more fun

> rubbing the Genie's lamp.


Aladdin had no nipples. Apparently Disney has a problem with nipples. You can't hanker after someone with no nipples.

Although not a cartoon character I remember finding the Buddhist Monk Tripitaka from Monkey emminantly fanciable when I was a nipper, he/she was beautiful. I subsequently found out that the charcter was in fact a lady playing a guy in that great Thesp tradition...but its quite amazing how ambiguous sexuality can stir up a whole host of congflicting emotions, dontchathink?

CamberwellOz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I can't say I fancied them as such but they were

> my favourite couple on television when I was a

> kid.

>

> http://www.blazesoftball.com/images/statler_waldor

> f_02_01.jpg


The fact that you posted your 'liking' for them on a thread titled 'Cartoon Characters you fancied' says much about your feelings for Statler and Waldorf CamberwellOz. These were not cartoons, but puppets. I believe that Freud indicated, in a lesser known monograph that a woman who was 'interested' in a puppet was highly significant in some way or another.

He concluded (or it may have been a footnote by Les Dawson, I can't be sure) that it would end up in a bed full of sawdust.

And you fancy the two of them!!! 'Struth CO, seek help, from Gerry Anderson, if necessary.

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Well I didn't personally fancy her, perish the

> thought, but that very sexy Rabbit (?Jessica

> Rabbit?) in Who Killed Roger Rabbit.

>

> Drunk? Not me :))


Of COURSE you didn't personally fancy Jessica Rabbit.

Who by the way was not a rabbit, but a pneumatic, pulchridutinous, hot red-headed woman. She just happened to be married to a git of a rabbit. And then you just throw in the drunk thing.

On the one hand, there's Jessica Rabbit. On the other hand there's a drunk Sue.

I'm saying "CLAP HANDS BROTHER AND SISTERS"

just to see what happens.

Hic.

It seems to me, that mentioning the Smurfs on a Cartoon Characters you fancied thread equates with that whole Anne Widdecombe peculiar lust, which took place on another. Thread that is.

And of course, on another is where that sort of lust or fancying belongs.

'Cordding to my Mama.

Annasfield, think you must be too young to remember Jason from Battle of the Planets? He could transmute me any day.


And is it really really wrong to fancy a cartoon without personality, who is in fact just a character in a video game? Step forward Ryu from Street Fighter (to be fair he did have a back story)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
    • To be fair we are as hosed as the majority of other countries post-Covid. The problem is Labour promised way too much and leant in on the we need change and we will deliver it and it was clear to anyone with a modicum of sense that no change was going to happen quickly and actually taking the reigns may have been a massive poison- chalice. As Labour are finding to their cost - there are no easy answers.  A wealth tax seems straightforward but look how Labour have U-turned on elements of non-dom - why? Because the super rich started leaving the country in their droves and whilst we all may want them to pay more tax they already pay a big chunk already and the government saw there was a problem.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...