Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I walked into the the newagents today to find the magazine rack covered wall-to-wall with Cheryl Cole.


Now this woman drives me mad.


How can anyone admire a woman who (allegedly) racially attacked a woman, (allegedly) slept with most of Newcastle United and is famous for what? Singing a little bit and wearing clothes. Where is there anything to admire in that?


There are more that I can mention:


Kate Moss

Peaches Geldof


With more young girls knowing the WAGS than any female MPs and their life ambition to be a model or a footballers wife, are there any people in the media that you think set a really bad role model?

All of them. A list - Z list. Anybody who would be happy to be described as a 'celebrity' i.e. no defining achievement. Ignore them - if we all did they would disappear and we could get on with more important things. (Not important as in weighty, serious, just important as in things that concern us, our friends and families as opposed to things concerning talentless attention-seeking inadequates).

To be fair to Kate Moss (and I am no fan) she is pretty much A List I would have thought. Totally with you on Peaches Geldof!


As for Cheryl Cole, I know what you're saying, but at least she is in a group. I can't stand the people that are "famous" for being in Big Brother or something similar.


I know some may disagree with this, but I can't stand Janet Street Porter!!! She obviously has some brains, but she gets her annoying self on every celebrity reality thing she can, and she goes on Question Time, and talks over everyone like she's an expert on everything, and she'll then come out with something rude, or risque before looking to the audience for a cheap laugh, which she seems to think means shes won the point. Grrr!!!! (6)

"To be fair to Kate Moss (and I am no fan) she is pretty much A List"


I know what you're saying but I'm totally with DaveR on this. Celebrity for its own sake is ultimately worthless.

She wears clothes, has her photo taken and encourages girls to snort coke in order to be borderline anorexic, well worth every penny of her millions, well done girl.


It does all devalue genuine achievement.


Katie Price is my nomination. I guess a minor tip of the hat for having survived and capitalised on on her start in a pretty ugly industry, but to constantly describe herself as an authoress and business woman? Pah.

Not to play devil's advocate, but I wouldn't say that Cheryl Cole was famous for "singing a little bit" - she's one fifth of Girls Aloud - a phenomenally successful pop group who've received critical acclaim as well as massive sales. I think there's something to admire there if pop's your thing.


Equally, with Keef on the Kate Moss thing. She might be a coke-addled serial rock f*cker and a terrible role model for women, but she's also an iconic figure in popular culture and has been at the top of the modelling game for quite some time.


But I wonder, is it really their responsibility to set themselves up as a role model? Aren't z-listers too just people living their lives and gaining fame and fortune however they can? I might find it dispiriting, but unless they expressly set out to do otherwise, I don't think it's anyone's responsibility to act as a role model for the nation.

Ooh and while I'm ranting .... ALEX EFFING JAMES!!!!!!


Yeah, he did learn an instrument and write tunes, and did well out of it, well done.

But does he have to appear on even more programmes than JSP? Writes a column for every publication in this country, be a celeb panelist as well as reality tv entrant, UN AMBASSADOR?!?!? I mean Question Time, seriously how is some floppy hair and the odd snort of derision actually going to grant me any extra insight into today's politics.


I don't suppose I can lay the blame of Auntie Beeb's dumbing down entirely at his door, let's just call him the poster child for that generation.


*c-c-c-c-c-c-cc--allllllllmmm d-d-d-d-d-oooooowwwwnn*

Not to play devil's advocate, but I wouldn't say that Cheryl Cole was famous for "singing a little bit" - she's one fifth of Girls Aloud - a phenomenally successful pop group who've received critical acclaim as well as massive sales. I think there's something to admire there if pop's your thing.


She won a competition because she can indeed sing a little bit.

There endeth the contribution. They don't write the songs, they're not behind their marketing, and the ones really laughing are of course the record execs behind them. They look pretty on a video and sometimes tour/tour the publicity circuit.

I'm sure it is really hard work, but then who out there doesn't work hard (apart from me today).


As for the role model, you can't have your cake and eat it. You can't be iconic and NOT a role model. On the one hand decrying press intrusion on your privacy to behave badly and the awful burden of being a role model; on the other bleating on about every celebrity cause de jour and wandering off to Darfuristan with the UN to highlight some plight or other.

mockney piers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "To be fair to Kate Moss (and I am no fan) she is

> pretty much A List"

>

> I know what you're saying but I'm totally with

> DaveR on this. Celebrity for its own sake is

> ultimately worthless.

> She wears clothes, has her photo taken and

> encourages girls to snort coke in order to be

> borderline anorexic, well worth every penny of her

> millions, well done girl.

>

Actually, I would say well done girl. Let's face it, she was never going to win a Nobel prize, she's not done badly for a thicko.


While I don't buy Hello and Heat and the rest of them, and am bored witless by most reality tv (I do like Strictly though) I can see that they're a form of entertainment and people - maybe not us but people - like them.


The people starring in them are making the kind of money that they wouldn't be able to make working down Tescos. Perhaps in an ideal world, salaries would be commensurate with how much the earner was adding to the overall sum of human experience... Is it not just intellectual snobbery to condemn people for making the best living they're capable of?

In Cheryl Cole's defence, I actually met her for the first time at Ashley Cole's 21st birthday party a few years ago (my friend is good mates with him). She's a nice enough girl really. A lot more human than most of the 'WAGS' (god, I hate that term) out there. She came across as being fairly reserved and unassuming. I certainly wouldn't put her in the same category as the likes of Roonie's other half, whatever her name is! As a couple, they were not there to impress or get stupidly intoxicated. In fact, it was one of the more civilised parties I've been to in my life. The press just love to make a story out of nothing...


Just to add to the name-dropping, I was out at a club in Vegas last weekend and had the displeasure of both Brittany and J-Lo in the same venue. The entourages were hilarious! It was obvious that a lot of Brittany's 'girl-friends' were hired in and she also had her own photographer (anyone else even attempting to take photos was frog-marched to the door!). We promptly left soon after they arrived, at it was an atmosphere killer for us.


Celebrity for celebrity sake. I can't stand it. There are very few other countries that are as obsessed with it as the UK. I think it's generally for people that have nothing interesting in their own lives to be getting on with, so would rather follow that of others...

Nicole Ritchie, Callum Best, Paris Hilton, Kimberly Stewart, whatever Ray Winstone's daughter is called, whatever the tongue-out-sticking, singing daughter of that crazy-looking actor is called ... anyone who's famous for being someone famous's child, being thin and falling out of taxis. The Osbourne children are excepted, as they seem quite fun and sassy.


But I agree with Mockers that it's all to do with the viewing public buying the mags...


Slightly unbelievably, I think Noel Gallagher made a good point about X-Factor and the inevitable fate of most of their winners quite recently. What do you do when you used to be a check-out person, and then you were a pop star and now you aren't a pop star any more?

Jade Goody. It irritates me that someone so stupid could be in so many magazines.


I don't think she's anywhere near as thick as people think. She's no accademic, but she has done what many other contestants of BB have failed to do and made quite a success of herself.

I know what you mean, Keef. She's a bit like Katie Price - she's obviously determined, astute and sharp. So not really stupid. But she IS stupid in lots of quite important ways - like the ability to listen, the ability to be interested in the world around her, any kind of curiosity. I found her and her monstrous mother's presence on our TV screens quite scary.

Richard Littlejohn

Piers Morgan

Melanie Philips


- all for the obvious reasons


Geri Halliwell - I think it's the desparation to be loved that grates.

Bono - Take off those fecking sunglasses (oh and The Edge - for being called The Edge) and get out of my tv.

Gillian McKeith - I'm on a FaceBook group that pledges to force-feed the witch a mars-bar if I ever spot her in the street.

The Osbourne children are excepted, as they seem quite fun and sassy.


I quite like Jack & Kelly. I mean they were bought up with money, fair enough, but then suddenly found themselves living in a soap opera, and were obviously going to act up a bit. However, I think they've both grown up and hold themselves quite well.


Interestingly, they have an older sister Aimee, who was old enough to make the decision to have nothing to do with The Osbourne's TV show, and any footage with her in could not be used. Good for her, but Kelly & Jack were too young to have made that decision and moved out.


Sharon Osbourne... I go from respecting and quite liking her, to thinking she is the most dispicible thing on telly (next to JSP of course). Great business woman (got that from her dad), but was happier when Ozzy was just a rock God, and she was his manager!

I simply don't care about any of them - however what I find sad is that some young girls would rather be a WAG or to gain 'celebrity' status in some other way than actually go out and get a job/career. If all you ever aspire to is to wear killer heels (and other stuff) on the front cover of a magazine - what do you do when you realise that isn't ever going to happen.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • “There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda ” I would call this “generous”   Labour should never have made that tax promise because, as with - duh - Brexit, it’s pretending the real world doesn’t exist now. I blame Labour in no small part for this delusion. But the electorate need to cop on as well.  They think they can have everything they want without responsibilities, costs or attachments. The media encourage this  Labour do need to raise taxes. The country needs it.  Now, exactly how it’s done remains to be seen. But if people are just going to go around going “la la laffer curve. Liars! String em up! Vote someone else” then they just aren’t serious people reckoning with the problem yes Labour are more than a year into their term, but after 14 years of what the Tories  did? Whoever takes over, has a major problem 
    • Messaging, messaging, messaging. That's all it boils down to. There are only so many fiscal policies out there, and they're there for the taking, no matter which party you're in. I hate to say it, but Farage gets it right every time. Even when Reform reneges on fiscal policy, it does it with enough confidence and candidness that no one is wringing their hands. Instead, they're quietly admired for their pragmatism. Strangely, it's exactly the same as Labour has done, with its manifesto reverse on income tax, but it's going to bomb.  Blaming the Tories / Brexit / Covid / Putin ... none of it washes with the public anymore  - it wants to be sold a vision of the future, not reminded of the disasters of the past. Labour put itself on the back foot with its 'the tories fucked it all up' stance right at the beginning of its tenure.  All Lammy had to do (as with Reeves and Raynor etc) was say 'mea culpa. We've made a mistake, we'll fix it. Sorry guys, we're on it'. But instead it's 'nothing to see here / it's someone else's fault / I was buying a suit / hadn't been briefed yet'.  And, of course, the press smells blood, which never helps.  Oh! And Reeve's speech on Wednesday was so drab and predictable that even the journalists at the press conference couldn't really be arsed to come up with any challenging questions. 
    • Niko 07818 607 583 has been doing jobs for us for several years, he is reliable, always there for us, highly recommended! 
    • I am keeping my fingers crossed the next few days are not so loud. I honestly think it is the private, back garden displays that are most problematic as, in general, there is no way of knowing when and where they might happen. For those letting off a few bangers in the garden I get it is tempting to think what's the harm in a few minutes of 'fun', but it is the absolute randomness of sudden bangs that can do irreparable damage to people and animals. With organised events that are well advertised there is some forewarning at least, and the hope is that organisers of such events can be persuaded to adopt and make a virtue of using only low noise displays in future.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...