Jump to content

Recommended Posts

So which one of you has given the mysterious nutter my address ? you know, the one who posts up hand typed Monarchist bollck sheets at the ED Station & ramdomly around the Lane ?


one arrived this week via post - nicely headed with a union jack & some half reasoned 2 page logic about restoring the monarchy to rule the country like in the old days


Grrrrr


I will be no be defacing your hand posted A4 sheets whenever I see them. with very bad words probabaly.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/4386-royalist-nutter-in-ed-lounged/
Share on other sites

tragic fr the family, yes Im sure.


Tragic for me as well - they cancelled the Newcastle / Liverpool game because of it


Tragic for the country, as it reinstated these parasites as national treasures, juset when people were begining to see what they really were.


But this isnt exactly ED related

I would be interested to know what your definition of a "parasite" is.


snorky Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> tragic fr the family, yes Im sure.

>

> Tragic for me as well - they cancelled the

> Newcastle / Liverpool game because of it

>

> Tragic for the country, as it reinstated these

> parasites as national treasures, juset when people

> were begining to see what they really were.

>

> But this isnt exactly ED related

Dear Snorkey,


We are subjects, not citizens as those nasty politicians would have you beleive. The Queen owns us and all the land we walk on and the houses we live in. If you die without leaving a will and you have no next of kin it all reverts to the Crown.


Democracy is a sham, elections are phoney. The poor sod who puts these stupid notices up hasn't got a clue. The monarchy are in complete control. Always will be, unless we abolish it and have a proper republic.


Which leads to the next question, who would be the president? Assuming, of course we retain parliment anda prime minister. Er, Neil Kinnock? Mrs T? Lord Coe? Peter Mandleson?


Personally, I'd rather stick with Liz. May not be perfect but at least you know where you are.

EDOldie Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Which leads to the next question, who would be the

> president? Assuming, of course we retain parliment

> anda prime minister. Er, Neil Kinnock? Mrs T? Lord

> Coe? Peter Mandleson?

>

> Personally, I'd rather stick with Liz. May not be

> perfect but at least you know where you are.


I've never understood the logic behind this question when used as a defence of monarchy.


It suggests that the only choice is between (a) an unelected monarch and (b) an elected figure of fun/scorn/hate etc - and nothing else. How do all the other elected democracies in the world manage?

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ...where do we start? Perhaps it would be easier

> if you could say what Prince Charles

> contributes....


Well, as you are the one making the unpleasant accusations against him, I think the onus is on you to back them up with something.


What exactly do you mean by "contributes"? It's hard to answer the question without knowing. Do you feel he "contributes" less than the average person in this country?

Interesting one this...


Hypothetically if they ceased to be monarchs, that still wouldn't give the nation any greater right to their properties than any other established hereditary family.


However, under the Civil List, the royal family gives up their Crown Estate revenue in return for parliament paying their expenses.


Since the revenue from the Crown Estates is just under ?200m, and the Civil List only amounts to ?12m, then tax payers receive a net return of ?188m per annum for retaining the royal family.


Despite cynicism inside our borders, you could argue that a vast proportion of GB Plc.'s revenues are influenced by the reputation for tradition and stability that the royal family confers on us abroad - far in excess of that paltry ?12m these guys cost us.

EDOldie Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Which leads to the next question, who would be the

> president?


Why is there this assumption that a country needs a leader? I personally think all a country should need is a competent administration.

jrussel Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ???? Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > ...where do we start? Perhaps it would be

> easier

> > if you could say what Prince Charles

> > contributes....

>

> Well, as you are the one making the unpleasant

> accusations against him, I think the onus is on

> you to back them up with something.

>

> What exactly do you mean by "contributes"? It's

> hard to answer the question without knowing. Do

> you feel he "contributes" less than the average

> person in this country?



I know what you are saying and I am not one to vent my anger on a lot for the misdeeds of their forears.Usually.But this lot have had a very good run considering they do nothing and their moneymaking "brand" is now property of UK Plc & in some ways, they are employees now.


I dont advocate execution, as its not in my nature, but repossesion of their lands & estates would be a good start


Thye can keep their crowns & vulgar gilded tat and decamp to the antidelivual vile tax havens of Isle of Man & the Channel islands if they dont like it


Maybe not logical, but this family line have been responsible for Millions of deaths over the years & their opulent soft furnishings are soaked in the blood of countless vitims across the globe


I dont want to put them on a LA estate in BOlton, but let them have a town house & 1 country retreat for their use.


I hear the South of France & Switzerland provide resting places for deposed dictators and various royals , so they should have some kindred spirtits to wile away their leisure time


Bye Bye Liz and good luck in your retirement

I've always hated the 'but their great for the tourist industry' argument as well. The French draw in more visitors than us each year, and they had the sense to take our demi-revolution of the 1650s through to its logical conclusion 150 years later.

Humankind will never make the next great leap forward until we throw off the security blankets of religion and/or monarchy and start to take a collective resposibility for our collective futures. The trouble is they tried all that with communism and unfortunately it didnt progress past its initial Dictatorship stage. For good or ill I think a form of communism might well be the only logical step forward and is particularly resonant in the current climate. Cor, its a toughie innit!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Here is another article from the excellent Special Needs Jungle (SNJ) with tips for responses to the SEND conversation survey. Including shoe horning in EHCPs which they "forget" to ask a question about in the conversation. And living as we do in Southwark with the huge misfortune of 100% academy secondary schools, some thoughts on this and how unlikely inclusion in mainstream is within the current education landscape. Closing date 14 Jan 2026. And please consider a donation to the excellent entirely run by volunteers SNJ. In my view the government could save money by creating some smaller mainstream secondary schools for kids who can cope in primary school but not  with the scale of secondary, and need a calmer less busy setting. The funding would have to be different - it is currently on a per pupil basis which favours larger schools. But it would undoubtedly be cheaper than specialist provision, and the huge cost to individual children and families (emotional and financial) and to society. https://www.specialneedsjungle.com/tips-help-complete-governments-send-conversation-survey-law/ If anyone wants to take a radical step to help their struggling child, my tip is to move far away: these are the best two schools I have ever visited and in a beautiful part of the country. I only wish we'd moved there before it was too late for my son who had to suffer multiple failings at Charter North and then at the hands of Southwark SEND, out of education from February to October in year 10-11, having already suffered the enduring trauma of a very difficult early life, which in combination with ADHD made his time at schools which just don't care so very unbearable for all of us. https://www.cartmelprioryschool.co.uk/ https://settlebeck.org/ As an add on, I would say to anybody considering adoption, please take into account the education battles that you are very much more likely to face than the average parent. First you have schools to deal with, already terrible; then being passed from pillar to post within Southwark Education, SEND, Education Inclusion Team, round and round as they all do their best to explain why they are not responsible and you need someone different, let's hold another multi-agency meeting, never for one minute considering that if they put the child at the centre and used common sense they would achieve a lot more in much less time without loads of Southwark employees sitting in endless meetings with long suffering parents. It is hard to fully imagine this at the start of your adoption journey, full of hope as you are, but truly education is not for the faint hearted, and should be factored into your decision. You'll never hear from people who are really struggling and continue to do so, only from those who've had challenges but overcome them and it's all lovely. And education, the very people who should be there to help, are the ones who make your lives the most hellish out of everything your child and you face.
    • It’s a big problem all over London. I’ve seen it happen in Kennington and Bloomsbury in the last year. I think there has been some progress recently with some key arrests, but you do need to be very careful when walking around with your phone out, especially, as you say, if wearing noise cancelling headphones. Sorry you experienced this 
    • Luke Johnson (prominent director and co-owner), supported Brexit and backed the Vote Leave campaign. He also described the response to Covid as ‘a campaign of fear’ and 2020 funded a media consultant for the ‘Covid-recovery group’ of anti-lockdown MPs.
    • I'm a bit of an architecture geek and I must confess I find it one of the most gimmicky ugly redesigns I've seen in a while. I'm always open to quirky but this is just not nice in any way shape or form.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...