Jump to content

Recommended Posts

So which one of you has given the mysterious nutter my address ? you know, the one who posts up hand typed Monarchist bollck sheets at the ED Station & ramdomly around the Lane ?


one arrived this week via post - nicely headed with a union jack & some half reasoned 2 page logic about restoring the monarchy to rule the country like in the old days


Grrrrr


I will be no be defacing your hand posted A4 sheets whenever I see them. with very bad words probabaly.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/4386-royalist-nutter-in-ed-lounged/
Share on other sites

tragic fr the family, yes Im sure.


Tragic for me as well - they cancelled the Newcastle / Liverpool game because of it


Tragic for the country, as it reinstated these parasites as national treasures, juset when people were begining to see what they really were.


But this isnt exactly ED related

I would be interested to know what your definition of a "parasite" is.


snorky Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> tragic fr the family, yes Im sure.

>

> Tragic for me as well - they cancelled the

> Newcastle / Liverpool game because of it

>

> Tragic for the country, as it reinstated these

> parasites as national treasures, juset when people

> were begining to see what they really were.

>

> But this isnt exactly ED related

Dear Snorkey,


We are subjects, not citizens as those nasty politicians would have you beleive. The Queen owns us and all the land we walk on and the houses we live in. If you die without leaving a will and you have no next of kin it all reverts to the Crown.


Democracy is a sham, elections are phoney. The poor sod who puts these stupid notices up hasn't got a clue. The monarchy are in complete control. Always will be, unless we abolish it and have a proper republic.


Which leads to the next question, who would be the president? Assuming, of course we retain parliment anda prime minister. Er, Neil Kinnock? Mrs T? Lord Coe? Peter Mandleson?


Personally, I'd rather stick with Liz. May not be perfect but at least you know where you are.

EDOldie Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Which leads to the next question, who would be the

> president? Assuming, of course we retain parliment

> anda prime minister. Er, Neil Kinnock? Mrs T? Lord

> Coe? Peter Mandleson?

>

> Personally, I'd rather stick with Liz. May not be

> perfect but at least you know where you are.


I've never understood the logic behind this question when used as a defence of monarchy.


It suggests that the only choice is between (a) an unelected monarch and (b) an elected figure of fun/scorn/hate etc - and nothing else. How do all the other elected democracies in the world manage?

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ...where do we start? Perhaps it would be easier

> if you could say what Prince Charles

> contributes....


Well, as you are the one making the unpleasant accusations against him, I think the onus is on you to back them up with something.


What exactly do you mean by "contributes"? It's hard to answer the question without knowing. Do you feel he "contributes" less than the average person in this country?

Interesting one this...


Hypothetically if they ceased to be monarchs, that still wouldn't give the nation any greater right to their properties than any other established hereditary family.


However, under the Civil List, the royal family gives up their Crown Estate revenue in return for parliament paying their expenses.


Since the revenue from the Crown Estates is just under ?200m, and the Civil List only amounts to ?12m, then tax payers receive a net return of ?188m per annum for retaining the royal family.


Despite cynicism inside our borders, you could argue that a vast proportion of GB Plc.'s revenues are influenced by the reputation for tradition and stability that the royal family confers on us abroad - far in excess of that paltry ?12m these guys cost us.

EDOldie Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Which leads to the next question, who would be the

> president?


Why is there this assumption that a country needs a leader? I personally think all a country should need is a competent administration.

jrussel Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ???? Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > ...where do we start? Perhaps it would be

> easier

> > if you could say what Prince Charles

> > contributes....

>

> Well, as you are the one making the unpleasant

> accusations against him, I think the onus is on

> you to back them up with something.

>

> What exactly do you mean by "contributes"? It's

> hard to answer the question without knowing. Do

> you feel he "contributes" less than the average

> person in this country?



I know what you are saying and I am not one to vent my anger on a lot for the misdeeds of their forears.Usually.But this lot have had a very good run considering they do nothing and their moneymaking "brand" is now property of UK Plc & in some ways, they are employees now.


I dont advocate execution, as its not in my nature, but repossesion of their lands & estates would be a good start


Thye can keep their crowns & vulgar gilded tat and decamp to the antidelivual vile tax havens of Isle of Man & the Channel islands if they dont like it


Maybe not logical, but this family line have been responsible for Millions of deaths over the years & their opulent soft furnishings are soaked in the blood of countless vitims across the globe


I dont want to put them on a LA estate in BOlton, but let them have a town house & 1 country retreat for their use.


I hear the South of France & Switzerland provide resting places for deposed dictators and various royals , so they should have some kindred spirtits to wile away their leisure time


Bye Bye Liz and good luck in your retirement

I've always hated the 'but their great for the tourist industry' argument as well. The French draw in more visitors than us each year, and they had the sense to take our demi-revolution of the 1650s through to its logical conclusion 150 years later.

Humankind will never make the next great leap forward until we throw off the security blankets of religion and/or monarchy and start to take a collective resposibility for our collective futures. The trouble is they tried all that with communism and unfortunately it didnt progress past its initial Dictatorship stage. For good or ill I think a form of communism might well be the only logical step forward and is particularly resonant in the current climate. Cor, its a toughie innit!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • As it turned out after my post, the police have photos. And even if they didn't, the OP reported the incident to the police, who would have asked for a description.  However there are all sorts of problems with eye witness descriptions, which would just be multiplied with several kids involved. I stand by my post. Are you suggesting a full description of these kids should be posted on here so that ... what?  Vigilante action by forum members? And if there was mistaken identity? Then what? Even if there wasn't, there could be all sorts of background issues relating to this sort of anti social behaviour. It should be left to the police to find and  appropriately deal with  the perpetrators of criminal behaviour. The police are far from perfect, but the alternative just makes a general slide into lawlessness more likely.
    • Hi there, we’re on Rodwell Road and need some large + medium moving boxes - please message if you’re trying to get rid of some, we can collect. 
    • bizarre responses from everyone but Cancerian 🤷🏾‍♀️ As an LL resident surely a perfectly normal enquiry in that one might wish to know who to look out for if lawless/feral kids are wreaking havoc? any distinguishing marks on the perpetrators? presumably the objection is that a physical description might reveal the alleged culprits as non-white? (nothing else makes sense with this bourgeois over-sensitivity). same botched thinking that causes police descriptions of suspects on the loose to omit this info  (top way to protect the public / solve the crime) FYI i'm a mixed-race female and interested in THE TRUTH. hence, i want to protect myself & my family against criminals. so please DESCRIBE the physical appearance of criminals or suspected criminals to help to keep us safe. thankyou.  "underlying agenda... strange" 😂😂😂 strange agenda to wish to be safe in my community. well played 🤯   working the nightshift here & getting mildly obsessed/infuriated with the peculiar responses. someone please explain how wishing to be able to attempt to identify, physically, the perpetrator(s) of an alleged local assault is "strange", with an "agenda"? God help us. (wait... "God"? must be a far-right religious maniac) "Unless there were distinctive features such as unusual clothing, how is that going to identify them"... green & purple mohican with accompanying buffalo 🦬 horns through the nose might do it; or simply hairstyle, skin colour, sartorial outfit... 🤔 "and even if it did, what would be the point, without photographic evidence that they had done anything wrong?" eyewitness reports? 😏    
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...