Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I doubt the OP was that close to the man or that her intention was an act of voyeurism.

She should give the image to the local police, maybe it's a habit.


It's not just a man thing, the worst I've seen was outside (what is now) KFC in Brixton town centre.

A busy Saturday afternoon when a woman hoisted up her garments and let rip.

The steam cloud was amazing, I really felt sorry for people eating Pizza in the restaurant.



Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


>

> You can photograph them, but purposely

> photographing their genitals is an entirely

> different offence to simple photographic consent.

> See all the cases of 'upskirt' offences.

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What if you photograph them but only show the

> picture from the neck down?

>

> Like they do with obese people on the news?


I always feel sorry for those people. Imagine seeing your own fat ass on the telly whilst you're trying to eat your dinner.

@ Dennis big lolz


I too have seen a woman in Brixton, doing exactly as you said, at the bus stop near McDonalds - and again I was equally disgusted, however, it was clearly evident that this individual had serious mental health issues and enjoyed the shocked looks we all gave.

You know, I realised this evening as I schlepped through Shoreditch (skirts held slightly away from pavements and walls, breathing through my mouth) that there are probably people who think stench of piss = urban = cool. It's probably being brought here by people who can't afford zone 1. That's just wrong.


(My phone changed the above to 'stench of loss', which I liked so much I almost left it.)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
    • Why have I got a feeling there was also a connection with the beehive in Brixton on that road next to the gym
    • Ah, thanks,  it all comes flooding back. I've actually been to the Hastings shop, I'd forgotten all about it, along with her name! Didn't she (in between?)  take over what  was then The Magnolia, previously The Magdala, now The Lordship, with her then partner? Or is that some figment of my imagination?  In fact, didn't they transform it from The Magdala (much missed) to The Magnolia? With flowery wallpaper covering the front of the bar? Which reminds me of the pub's brief period after The Magnolia  as the ill-conceived and ill-fated The Patch.
    • Looking for crate/toys/play pen etc. Ideally will buy in a bundle. Can collect!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...