Jump to content

Recommended Posts

While calling England's exit a 'humiliation', Lineker criticised Gerrard's 'individual' attitude and his lack or organisational skills.


He said: 'Steven Gerrard, wonderful player that he is, has always been an individual in many ways


'He's not really a player that can organise or spot problems. He didn't spot the danger on England's left side in the first game, which was pretty obvious after a few attempts.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/worldcup2014/article-2665073/Gary-Lineker-slams-Roy-Hodgsons-tactics-brands-Englands-World-Cup-2014-group-stage-exit-humiliation.html#ixzz35SIbljDG

Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

I've predicted Belgium to be in the final simply because I chose them from the start & put a bet on them to win.


It was based on the fact that they have a lot of top class players. I admit they haven't been that great. I expected Lukaku to score a few times, but he's been terrible.

Sticking by them though because they appear to be late starters in their matches so far, saving all the good stuff for the last ten minutes. If they get their act together early on, it may just come together for them.


As for France, they've impressed me in both their games more than any other team so far.

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I hope so too. A game of this magnitude... no time

> to be messing around with a tried and trusted

> formula.


I think Einstein said it best - "Making Lampard Captain in Gerrard's place is the definition of insanity..."


But it's okay - after listening to his (Hodgson's) bleating about the hurt he felt and how raw Gerrard was and hoping senior players would 'help the young along' in the future I'm sure Lampard and Stevie will entertain us at international level for some time yet if he has his way.


hurrah - roll on the Euros.

maxxi Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> aquarius moon Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I'll probably be saying the same thing tomorrow

> if

> > England play all their rejects, then go on to

> win.

>

> Er, could you narrow it down a little...?



The non starters Maxxi. The ones who should have done, but didn't.

El Pibe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> are there any vaguely good quality streaming

> sites?

> RTE not showing the game and ITV not available in

> sky Ireland.

>

> Watching vipboxeu stream, but terible quality



try wiziwig.


or the watch espn app on the ipad - although not sure if it will work in the UK?

He definitely did. He needs to be banned from the rest of this World Cup plus another 20 matches and I'm sorry Otta but that should include Liverpool. On top of that he should get a hefty fine and a muzzle.


This obviously didn't work last time out so muzzle the nutter.


http://i1369.photobucket.com/albums/ag237/jahlushhead/Suarez_zps6566998a.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Rant ahead: You're not one of them but unfortunately, there's a substrate of posters here that do very little except moan and come up with weird conspiracy theories. They're immediately highly critical of just about any change, and their initial assumption is that everyone else is a total fucking contemptible idiot. For example: don't you think that the people who run the libraries will have considered the impact of timing of reconstruction on library users? (In fact, we know they have - because they've made arrangements at other libraries to attempt to mitigate the disruption). After all, these are the people that spend their whole working week thinking about libraries and dealing with library users (and the kids especially). You don't go into the library game for the chicks and fame - so it's fair to assume that librarians are committed to public service and public access to libraries, including by kids. Likewise the built environment people (engineers, architects, construction managers, project managers, construction contractors, subcontractors or whoever is on this job) are told to minimise disruption on every job they do. The thing that occurs to us as amateurs within 30 seconds of us seeing something is probably not something a full time professional hasn't thought about! Southwark Council, the NHS, TfL, Dulwich Estate, Thames Water, Openreach - they're not SPECTRE factories filled with malevolent chaosmongers trying to persecute anyone. They're mostly filled with people who understand their job and try to do their best with what they've been given - just like all of us. Nobody is perfect or immune from challenge, and that's fair enough, but why not at least start from the assumption that there's a good reason why things have been done the way they have? Any normal person would be pleased that their busy, pretty, lively local library is getting refurbished, and will have more space and facilities for kids and teens, and will be more efficient to run and warmer in winter. But no, EDT_Forumite_752 had kids who did an exam 20 years ago, and this makes them an expert on library refurbishment who can see it's all just stuff and nonsense for the green agenda and why can't it all be put off... 😡😡😡
    • I completely misread the previous post, sorry. For some reason I thought the mini cooper was also a police vehicle, DUH.
    • This has given me ideas for the ginger wine I love, that no one else likes!      
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...