Jump to content

Recommended Posts

While calling England's exit a 'humiliation', Lineker criticised Gerrard's 'individual' attitude and his lack or organisational skills.


He said: 'Steven Gerrard, wonderful player that he is, has always been an individual in many ways


'He's not really a player that can organise or spot problems. He didn't spot the danger on England's left side in the first game, which was pretty obvious after a few attempts.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/worldcup2014/article-2665073/Gary-Lineker-slams-Roy-Hodgsons-tactics-brands-Englands-World-Cup-2014-group-stage-exit-humiliation.html#ixzz35SIbljDG

Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

I've predicted Belgium to be in the final simply because I chose them from the start & put a bet on them to win.


It was based on the fact that they have a lot of top class players. I admit they haven't been that great. I expected Lukaku to score a few times, but he's been terrible.

Sticking by them though because they appear to be late starters in their matches so far, saving all the good stuff for the last ten minutes. If they get their act together early on, it may just come together for them.


As for France, they've impressed me in both their games more than any other team so far.

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I hope so too. A game of this magnitude... no time

> to be messing around with a tried and trusted

> formula.


I think Einstein said it best - "Making Lampard Captain in Gerrard's place is the definition of insanity..."


But it's okay - after listening to his (Hodgson's) bleating about the hurt he felt and how raw Gerrard was and hoping senior players would 'help the young along' in the future I'm sure Lampard and Stevie will entertain us at international level for some time yet if he has his way.


hurrah - roll on the Euros.

maxxi Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> aquarius moon Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I'll probably be saying the same thing tomorrow

> if

> > England play all their rejects, then go on to

> win.

>

> Er, could you narrow it down a little...?



The non starters Maxxi. The ones who should have done, but didn't.

El Pibe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> are there any vaguely good quality streaming

> sites?

> RTE not showing the game and ITV not available in

> sky Ireland.

>

> Watching vipboxeu stream, but terible quality



try wiziwig.


or the watch espn app on the ipad - although not sure if it will work in the UK?

He definitely did. He needs to be banned from the rest of this World Cup plus another 20 matches and I'm sorry Otta but that should include Liverpool. On top of that he should get a hefty fine and a muzzle.


This obviously didn't work last time out so muzzle the nutter.


http://i1369.photobucket.com/albums/ag237/jahlushhead/Suarez_zps6566998a.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
    • To be fair we are as hosed as the majority of other countries post-Covid. The problem is Labour promised way too much and leant in on the we need change and we will deliver it and it was clear to anyone with a modicum of sense that no change was going to happen quickly and actually taking the reigns may have been a massive poison- chalice. As Labour are finding to their cost - there are no easy answers.  A wealth tax seems straightforward but look how Labour have U-turned on elements of non-dom - why? Because the super rich started leaving the country in their droves and whilst we all may want them to pay more tax they already pay a big chunk already and the government saw there was a problem.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...