Jump to content

New HEAD CHEF started at THE CHERRY TREE!!!!


purds89

Recommended Posts

Just to be clear, plenty of people have said negative things about the Vale that are not connected (directly at least) with relationships between management and ever changing staff i.e. rubbish beer selection, boring food (other than the short periods when they've had someone really trying in the kitchen) and zero atmosphere. Tbh it feels like a throwback to London pubs in the 80s, and not in a good way. The whole saga of staff turning up all keen and then leaving in despair has been so much of a soap opera tho' that inevitably its in the forefront of people's minds. I don't care - I didn't know any of them - but imho the Vale is just a rubbish boozer.

Also if the owners did put anything on here they would be ripped to bits like anyone else from the Cherry Tree..


Even the chef put a post up and with in 5 min he was ripped to bit and not one of you know the guy ,,,


I think its very sad that this happens.

So that is a categoric "I am not pokertime" from you djkq?


Djblair. No one is having a pop at the new chef. Quite the opposite. Good luck to him etc. BUT. if he cared to look at what happened to his predecessors, he might be able to save himself some hassle

DJKillaQueen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I don't post on the forum anymore for lots of

> reasons, but I do check in and lurk. For the

> record LD, I have never been banned from this

> forum and I'd appreciate if you left me out of

> your squabbles with others.




Hahahaha, not even mildly convincing.

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Djblair. No one is having a pop at the new chef.

> Quite the opposite. Good luck to him etc. BUT. if

> he cared to look at what happened to his

> predecessors, he might be able to save himself

> some hassle



Okay, even if you are spot on about this, there is a difference between bar managers like Chris & Antonia, and a chef. The Chef may decide he doesn't fancy it after working there for a while, but it's very unlikely he's been made wild promises.

Are you able to separate that whole debacle from the ongoing revolving door of manager and chefs?


It?s also worth noting that when new managers or chefs do start posting on here, the style is always very similar:


Exclamation marks

Over optimism

No attempt to speak to past problems and why people might have an issue with the place


Why, it?s almost as if ?somebody else? is telling them what and how to do it


Or it could all be a coincidence

I mean - the last chef - you all remember, the superb American chef


http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?30,1305039,1307603#msg-1307603


what happened with him? Anyone know? Anyone find it odd that he was so good and lasted just weeks?

I've gone back and read previous threads now, and can confirm that as long as Tony & Gary are running the joint, certain posters won't give it a chance whatever happens.


Right or wrong? Dunno really, they've clearly upset people and treated staff badly in the past.


But I just don't dig this whole "we're warning the innocents" vibe.

I've never been in this place. Nothing to do with threads on here.. it just looks abysmal from the outside.


I haven't noticed other 'rejuvenated' local drinking holes (eg The Great Exhibition / sorry, Otta - the CPT) on here, desperately begging for business on a regular basis - under a different *HEY GUYS - ALL NEW* guise every time.


It something's any good, people just start going. Then more people start going.


And it doesn't need constantly fixing, because it isn't constantly broke.

"Clearly not no, but they're all grown ups who can decide for themselves!"


the whole chris/antonia thing suggests it's not as simple as that.


If we are to believe them (and having spoken at length with them during and after, I certainly do) then how Gary & co treat people has a serious impact on their lives

On that particular couple who apparently gave up other work and made a home in the area to come and do the job, yes.


They are the only ones that we heard from after it had gone wrong (as far as I'm aware). We never heard from Ryan, or the American Chef etc, so we don't know.


I dunno man, you seem REALLY REALLY in to this. When I did a search for cherry tree earlier I noticed that when a former poster who has moved popped back to the forum to say hello and ask what had been going on, from all the things you could have said, you chose to tell him that managers and chefs come and go from the cherry tree and that "we" try to warn them.


Is this your new mission in life?


My big question is, do you think that threads like this do ANYTHING at all to actually help these people whilst they are working there? Because all I can see them doing is keeping custom away and ensuring that these "innocents" don't stand a chance.


If I was the owner(s) I'd contact admin and ask that there be absolutely NO mention of my business on the forum (and ensure that my staff didn't start threads) much like the owner of that crappy cakeshop with the posh french light fitting did.


This forum and The Cherry Tree are never going to be happy bed fellows.

It's partly historical... Back to the days when you used to complain about them when they barred you and the invention of NTV acronym


Despite the last ten years plus where all the pubs in dulwich evolved and changed, that place has exactly the same problems


We know the owners read the forum, and I hold some hope that they can see that we can see through their transparent "we are different now" promises


If they are being unfairly maligned, it should be easy to engage, just as other businesss have on here, and go "you wouldn't believe the bad luck we've had with staff and here's what we plan to do"


If the business fails it's odd that you think some comments on a local forum near the brunt of responsibility and not abysmal management


Advocating censorship seems weird as well.

There was also a point when is tried to swim against the tide and support the place. I started going regularly, got to know some of them a tiny bit and I tried to get others to go. I feel like a patsy for falling for it


That said, when people started to insult the owners for how the looked I stood up against that too. So I don't think I'm historically completely opposed to the place. But watching people try and defend them when I know what they do irks me


Sometimes people have a bad rep for a genuine reason

They don't have any legal right to stop discussion on the forum. Le Chandelier tried that but can no longer threaten action against the forum. They can I believe take civil action against individual posters.


The Cherry Tree sounds like it's had a rough ride, probably because of the owners. The proof of the pudding though etc. we went in for a drink a couple of weeks ago to try it. Pretty unatmospheric - that's all I can say about the place.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • But there's a case for advisory guidance at least, surely? It's a safety issue, and surely just common sense? What do other countries do? And are there any statistics for accidents involving cyclists which compare those in daylight and those in dusk or at night, with and without street lighting?
    • People travelling by bicycle should have lights and reflectors of course. Assuming they do, then the are perfectly visible for anyone paying adequate attention. I don't like this idea of 'invisible' cyclists - it sounds like an absolute cop out. As pointed out above, even when you do wear every fluorescent bit of clothing going and have all the lights and reflectors possible, drivers will still claim they didn't see you. We need to push back on that excuse. If you're driving a powerful motor vehicle through a built up area, then there is a heavy responsibility on you to take care and look out for pedestrians and cyclists. It feels like the burden of responsibility is slightly skewed here. There are lot's of black cars. They pose a far greater risk to others than pedestrians or cyclists. I don't hear people calling for them to be painted brighter colours. We should not be policing what people wear, whether walking, cycling or driving.
    • There does seem to be increasing use of an unofficial cycling get up which is black trousers, black jacket, black headgear (not usually a helmet) which makes cyclists and electric motorised cycle riders effectively invisible at night.  For example, a number of cycling delivery drivers seem to choose this get up.  It is their choice but it's a risky choice and a difficult one for a rational person to understand.  
    • Help us mark a decade of local journalism and ensure the next ten years of The Dulwich Diverter! To pledge, please go to: tiny.cc/dd10 Since 2016, The Dulwich Diverter has been telling the stories that matter in East Dulwich, West Dulwich, Dulwich Village and the surrounding neighbourhoods.  Stories about the independent traders, the everyday heroes, the corners of SE22 that wouldn't normally make the front page. In early 2026 we hope to reach our 10‑year anniversary.    Why this campaign matters: Free, local journalism in print is under pressure. The voices and stories of our community deserve an ongoing platform and your support will help ensure that platform remains vibrant, independent, and thriving. What we’ll do with your support: With your pledge today you will help us to keep going for the next few years, produce a special 10‑year anniversary print edition and host an event to celebrate 10 years of the newspaper. A bit more information about us: Through reading our newspapers, people have become involved with local charities and good causes they may otherwise never have known about. We rely solely on advertising sales to keep us in print. However, this year has been a somewhat bumpy ride for many local businesses who have been regular supporters of the paper hence us needing to crowdfund. All revenue raised helps us pay our contributors and fund the professional journalism and high quality photography, illustration and design that are the hallmarks of the titles we produce. The more money we have, the more stories we can publish and every single page of advertising is thoughtfully matched with a page of high quality and engaging editorial  (“all killer, no filler” to quote one reader), which increases reader “dwell time” and ensures that people linger on each spread for longer. We personally hand deliver every single copy of the newspaper and we have a diverse range of stockists to ensure we reach the whole of the community, not just one part of it.  You can find us in all sorts of places, from laundrettes, libraries and hair salons to shops, pubs and cafes. We believe local publications should truly reflect the areas they cover and we strive to represent the incredible diversity of south-east London on our pages.  We invest a huge amount of time and effort in seeking out stories that no one else has written about and sharing them with our readers. We aim to appeal to everyone in the area; those who have lived here their whole lives and those who have just arrived. We have readers of all ages – from 9 to 99!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...