Jump to content

WARNING: Large scale cyber attack will hit in 2 weeks, be prepared!!!


Recommended Posts

You may have seen it in the news over the last couple of days and it's extremely important you take action now before it's too late. A huge cyber attack on unprecedented scale is going to be carried out within 2 weeks!


You need to prepare yourself NOW or you are at risk of losing money, personal files and data.


What to do:


- carry out virus and malware check on all your computers

- make sure your security is software is working and is up to date

- make sure your operating system is up to date

- back up all your important data to external device (HDD, DVD-R or memory stick)

- back up your operating system to make sure you have a recovery copy should things go wrong


PLEASE DO NOT IGNORE THIS AS IT IS A VERY REAL THREAT, EVERYONE IS AT RISK!!!!!


If you do not know how to go about protecting yourself we are happy to help, just give us a call or drop us a line to book an appointment.


Regards,


Pawel

http://ukcomputers.eu

[email protected]

020 3086 7882

Important to pay special attention to incoming mail and attachments.


People using Twitter should be careful opening Direct Messages. Even Mouse over text can be a threat.


Same goes for Facebook Games. A serious risk of any virus spreading through interactive games with other users.

Even if you 'know' them.


Anywhere where you have Followers / Friends / Contacts.


DulwichFox

More info here....


http://news.sky.com/story/1274201/cyber-attack-to-hit-in-next-two-weeks


I guess the advice is the same as always. Don't open attachments or links sent by anyone but genuine contacts. Most people have junk folders full of emails trying to steal account details. I just delete them.


The only worrying thing from the article is the ability to hide the malware in a genuine looking email from a genuine contact. But even there, there would have to be a link to click I'm guessing, or an attachment.


Here's a more rational take....


http://news.sky.com/story/1274437/how-serious-is-ominous-global-cyber-threat

I would have hoped an 'expert' would not be engaging in scare tactics like this to try and drum up business.


There will be no 'cyber attack in two weeks'. What will happen is that a cyber threat that existed up until about a week or so ago (and has done for about 12 months) will again be a danger. That's not to say that you should not be prepared, get all your OSs and virus checkers up to date and be cautious of any unusual emails, but the world is not going to end in two weeks (well, not by CryptoLocker, anyway).


Pretty unprofessional behaviour by the OP, IMHO.

aalisam Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Please qualify info by stating the following areas

> are effected.

>

> PC Microsoft platforms

>

> And /or

>

> Apple IOS

>

> Many thanks


Only Windows (all flavours) are currently affected by the issue. That's not to say Mac, Linux and/or smart phone users may be at risk later, but it's only windows at the moment.


The major way this gets you is by opening infected email attachments. Be on your guard, especially anything marked as a PDF from an unexpected source. And keep your virus checker up to date.

ukcomputers Wrote:

----------------------------------------------

> - back up all your important data to external device (HDD, DVD-R or memory stick)



DVD-R!!!


Haven't seen one of those in about 5-7yrs...


Mac. Cloud. Done.


That's three steps. Well two, really.

Depends how many files someone has. Computer savvy people tend to use external hard drives. Those who aren't savvy may well still use DVDrs or worse still never back up. Some people use online backup services too. If everyone knew the ins and outs of their computers there'd be no need for repairs services. Macs are well beyond the budget of most people. So the more people are reminded of how to best protect themselves from any kind of virus, bot, trojan etc, the better.


Having said all that though, most virus problems can be removed by taking the hard drive out, connecting it to another computer and running a scan on it as an external drive. And most personal files can easily be recovered the same way, if only the OS is corrupted. If registries are corrupted it becomes a little more tricky.

Same here, PT. I have about half a TB of data, so cloud storage would be expensive. I keep a few things on OneDrive (was SkyDrive), but mostly I have a home NAS with ownCloud on it that I back up to external drive.


I am just configuring it to to a backup non-music/film data to a non-visible area of itself so that, should something like CryptoLocker hit, I can get get my more dynamic data back fast.

Sounds like a good plan.


I have four 2TB external drives I use on my laptop. What I tend to do is copy a file to my laptop HD if I want to work on it/ play it/ watch it etc, and keep the external drives disconnected the rest of the time. The chances then of anything corrupting those files is pretty much nil. I'm just as careful with my mac too. Whilst macs may be less susceptible to viruses, they are still capable of OS corruption and other software problems from time to time.


I guess it's just about getting into a habit of working in a way that minimises the risk of losing anything.

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Same here, PT. I have about half a TB of data, so cloud storage would be expensive.


I'm considering Crashplan - unlimited storage from $4/month seems pretty reasonable to me: http://www.code42.com/crashplan


Free off site and continuous backup.

Have one of those DVD writers which using the appropriate disks promise archival that would outlive the user:


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M-DISC


My daily data is rsynced over an encrypted tynnel to an encrypted disk on a hosted server.


Not sure what the OP is about though ... sounds a bit like Chicken Licken. But then again I don't use Windows ... wouldn't have a clue.

That's why audio visual and pc equipment is shielded though El Pibe.


It pays to buy better drives of course. Again if a drive does fail, it can be recovered providing the disk surface isn't damaged.


Crashplan does look good. 4 bucks is no money at all, esp for unlimited storage.

njc97 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Loz, pretty harsh to describe the original post as

> "scare tactics to drum up business" when he was

> repeating NCA advice:

> http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-27681236


It is scare tactics. Blanket assumption that everyone is using windows and everyone is at risk.


My feelings are now ... cough ... hurt

njc97 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Loz, pretty harsh to describe the original post as

> "scare tactics to drum up business" when he was

> repeating NCA advice:

> http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-27681236


Actually, they original advice from the NCA was far less hysterical.


http://www.nationalcrimeagency.gov.uk/news/news-listings/386-two-week-opportunity-for-uk-to-reduce-threat-from-powerful-computer-attack


So, either


a) the original post was, indeed, scare tactics to drum up business, or

b) they don't understand the nature of the problem, and so shouldn't be offering to help people.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • Thank you, I will be vigilant
    • @Sue said: nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? This is the point. Adults are meant to teach their children by example. It sounds as though the adult guardian/ father in this case did not react appropriately. Had a truly sincere apology been given,  I suspect the OP would not have posted on here. It is possible the OP snapped in the heat of the moment, but they were possibly startled because they were hit from behind? If we are startled it can be instinctive to initially react with anger. I also agree that it would be highly irresponsible to let any very young child ride or walk or do anything on a busy public street without supervision- most of all to protect the child. If in this case the child was out of the adult's line of sight that is perhaps another indication that the father needs a refresh in appropriate behaviour around a child, as well as his manners.
    • Malumbu,  if none of us were there, does that mean that nobody should post anything on here unless they have witnesses from the EDF? Why would someone post something like this if it  wasn't true? This is not about whether children should or should not be cycling on the pavement. There are specific issues. a) the child was out of sight of the person supposed to be caring for him b) he appears to have been  either not looking where he was going or was out of control of the bike c) if he did see that he was about to hit someone  he apparently did not give them any kind of warning  d)  a person was unexpectedly hit from behind whilst just walking along, which in my view makes him a victim e) does the title of the thread really matter as the issue was described in the first post?  f) nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? The OP was not complaining about the 4 year old. They were complaining about an adult's lack of supervision of a 4 year old who was not capable of riding a bike and who hit someone from behind with no warning. Also, apart from reading the OP more carefully, perhaps also choose your words more carefully. Jobless? Lunatic? Charming.
    • I have to say, I too am upset about the passing of DulwichFox. He was a real local character, who unlike me, managed to stick with ED despite all of the nauseous yuppification of the last three decades. R.I.P to foxy    Louisa. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...