Jump to content

Recommended Posts

cle Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think there is certainly a hint of

> blame/backhandedness in:

>

> "hopefully will be a bit more aware of her

> surroundings now when she's walking down the

> street reading her phone. "



Well if you think it, then it must be right. I'm sure you know what I'm thinking a lot better than I do.

I think you're wrong cle. We live in a big city, crime happens... it's sensible to take basic precautions. If the woman in question (and maybe people reading this thread) can learn a little something from it, then at least there's a hint of a silver lining to this whole thing.

No matter what precautions you take to protect your phone, the majority of people will always get their phone out, wherever they are to read a txt message/reply.


I'm guilty of getting mine out at every bus stop to see when the bus is due.


You know it's risky but reading your txt, knowing the bus times is more important.

So we saying our society is so bad that you can't risk using a phone in a public place for fear of it being forcibly taken from you and that this is such a common occurrence that you can't reasonably expect to be protected by the law?


And then we wonder why people get vexed hearing about a mugger who nearly gets caught and our reaction is, but it?s only a phone and you didn?t get hurt so it?s not so bad! Ho hum?.

SJ:

1. Do I think I can walk around London with impunity - (I think thats what you mean right?)


Impunity: exemption from punishment or freedom from the injurious consequences of an action


Yes I do. I'm not in a hurry to walk down Rye Lane at midnight on a Saturday night but generally, yes, I expect to go about my normal business with impunity.


2. "Jesus. Look who in arguing with".


I dont know what you mean SJ, elaborate please? you dont know me, I'm curious????

Of course you can walk down the road using your phone, I do it all the time. And despite what cle thinks I think, I don't think that you're asking for it.


But you do need to be very aware of what's going on around you for various reasons.

Something I'd recommend to everyone is a self-protection course. They don't just teach you how to defend yourself, but also how to be aware of possible danger and avoid having to actually defend yourself in the first place.


Daniel, from www.walterstaekwondo.com does regular self-protection courses taught by a visiting instructor who has years of experience in different martial arts, teaches the police and works as a guard in a scary Manchester prison. He is good at showing you how to take easy precautions and to think on your feet.


I've been on a couple and found them really useful.

But I still will get my mobile out when I choose.


Mind you I know my body language says Keep Off - which is how London has made me.



Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Theft is a fact of life these days. Mobile phone

> theft is very common. It has happened around here

> many times. The girl hasn't been blamed but if you

> have something worth stealing you need to have a

> bit of awareness about you. I don't have a top of

> the range phone but I find that if people are

> moving to get off the train for example and I'm

> using it, I hold onto it just a little bit

> tighter, in case.

Rye Lane is pretty safe - it's the quiet lanes I'd think would leave people vulnerable.


Sophron Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> SJ:

> 1. Do I think I can walk around London with

> impunity - (I think thats what you mean right?)

>

> Impunity: exemption from punishment or freedom

> from the injurious consequences of an action

>

> Yes I do. I'm not in a hurry to walk down Rye Lane

> at midnight on a Saturday night but generally,

> yes, I expect to go about my normal business with

> impunity.

>

> 2. "Jesus. Look who in arguing with".

>

> I dont know what you mean SJ, elaborate please?

> you dont know me, I'm curious????

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Post much better this Xmas.  Sue posted about whether they send Xmas cards; how good the post is,  is relevant.  Think I will continue to stay off Instagram!
    • These have reduced over the years, are "perfect" lives Round Robins being replaced by "perfect" lives Instagram posts where we see all year round how people portray their perfect lives ?    The point of this thread is that for the last few years, due to issues at the mail offices, we had delays to post over Christmas. Not really been flagged as an issue this year but I am still betting on the odd card, posted well before Christmas, arriving late January. 
    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
    • Why have I got a feeling there was also a connection with the beehive in Brixton on that road next to the gym
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...