Jump to content

Well done (for assisting a lady after she had her phone snatched


Recommended Posts

Usually that mild punishment has the additional text that being upside down the

victim/iphone robber stays conscious longer as blood rushes to the head.


LadyDeliah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think driving at a perp is not the right thing

> to do. I think this is probably a better option.

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Daily Mail is in "Have a go hero of the week"


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2543189/Brave-hero-chased-burglar-car-mounting-pavement-cut-escape-spotting-raiding-neighbours-home.html



Dopamine1979 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I generally try to steer clear of vaguely serious

> threads but....

>

> A motorist mounted the pavement?!?

>

> Is anyone seriously condoning this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here we go again. The EDF liberal elite with their slap on the hand mentality. Why don't we give the poor chap counselling too for all the stress these inconsiderate folk put him through? What a load of tosh. He deserved everything coming to him if he went out of his way to mug someone in broad daylight. No one is seriously suggesting death upon the person, but come on, do you not think he would be laughing at all the comments regarding cars mounting pavements and hang draw and quartering him? He knows he did wrong, we know he did wrong, and more importantly, the innocent woman who has probably be left with mental scars over this incident knows he did wrong. End of.


Louisa.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No one disputes that he's a prick who did wrong.


I wasn't even concerned for him when I commented about cars mounting the pavement, I just think that's a bloody dangerous thing to do (I had an image of a small kid not being seen by a driver).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is "end of" MORE or LESS proscriptive than liber elite hand slapping? I can't decide


Louisa, love. No one is defending or losing sleep over a thieving scrote


What some of us MIGHT be saying is to descend into the kind of vigilante action and braying, even if only joking, is not a good look for any society. Feel free to point out anywhere you think contradicts this

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Otta I agree 100% cars mounting pavements isn't something to condone, but surely the point of this thread is to expose a criminal and congratulate those who helped the victim by trying to catch him? Any other issues are surely common sense and shouldn't be dealt with on here. Think of the poor victim reading this thread, and how they would feel about all of the supposedly humorous posts about possible punishments. She's done nothing wrong and is reading comments which in her eyes sound sympathetic to the perpetrator. I'd be a bit p/$$ed dunno about you?


Louisa.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> No one disputes that he's a prick who did wrong.

>

> I wasn't even concerned for him when I commented

> about cars mounting the pavement, I just think

> that's a bloody dangerous thing to do (I had an

> image of a small kid not being seen by a driver).



If the car mounted the pavement to deter a thief, surely that meant there were no small kids/pedestrians on said pavement?

Would he have really done so otherwise & risked mowing them all down?


Very much doubt it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> And it's not possible that the driver copuld miss

> something in the heat of the bizarre moment?



Very unlikely.


I'm not the driver in question so it would be interesting to hear his take on events, but can't imagine he would be so intent on catching the perp that he would run down innocent pedestrians in the process.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What advice are people given if someone snatches their handbag? And why? It's not out of sympathy for the criminal


Sure, hold on to the handbag but you risk trouble. Or worse


Going all The Professionals over an iPhone is ott at best and dangerous at worst. If my daughter was injured by some have a go hero who was focused on somebody else, over a phone??!!, then we would see ugliness


Many of us on here have been victims of theft ( me phone, another time me burgled). It's horrible horrible but no one got hurt. Sympathies as always with the victim. But using it as an excuse for nonsense is poor

Link to comment
Share on other sites

StraferJack, the young lady who was mugged on Sunday was someone?s daughter and if you were her Dad perhaps you might feel differently about "going all The Professionals" and indeed "then we would see some ugliness". That?s the point; most of us or our family?s have had bad experiences with muggers, thieves, burglars etc. without anything really being done, that?s why you get the reactions that you are so unhappy about. You call it nonsense, I call it taking action and I'm glad that those people did, they should be commended, it's just a shame the **** got away. If you want a good example of nonsense check out the way that the law is applied in the courts dealing with twats like this - maybe then you'd be a little more animated about criminals getting a free pass - regardless of wether it's just "over a phone".
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sophron Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> And the bloke what done it deserved a slap so the

> next daughter what gets mugged for her phone by

> the same geezer might not have to coz he would

> have been taught a lesson.. thats what..innit..ffs


BBW doing sub lock-stock working class parody? you used to be better than tha'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fact he gave the phone back before running off again seems to me he knew he did wrong and had a conscience .... He could have carried on running with it as he did escape despite delaying time by returning the phone so sounds like he would have been long gone with her phone despite everyone's actions .

My personal opinion is that its a phone and doesn't worth putting lives at risk though I totally condemn his actions .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know El Pibe. No excuses, perhaps it's all this talk of justified retribution. I'd much prefer the old bill to deal with it..whoops there I go again, sorry! Let's get back to consequences and responsibility for our fellow citizens etc.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Well worth signing up to become a "supporter" as they send their updates and often shed light on things the council and their supporters would rather didn't get too much attention! https://www.onedulwich.uk/get-involved
    • Spot on...and they rant against "anonymous" groups like One Dulwich and then post missives from "anonymous" lobby groups like Clean Air Dulwich without any sense of hypocrisy or irony...
    • The original council proposals for the area around the Dulwich cross roads were made well before Covid - and were rejected then by locals. The council used the Covid legislation to push through the LTNs when opposition was not allowed. LTNs, as experiments were some good (reduced traffic in areas which did not push traffic elsewhere and which did meet the needs of residents - typically in places very well served by public transport and where the topology (absence e.g. of hills) allowed wide use of cycling and walking - not as it happens a good description of the Dulwich (inc ED, WD and ND) areas.)  Dulwich never met Southwark's own description of ideal LTN areas, but did happen to match Southwark Councillor ambitions dating way back. One Dulwich has been clear, I believe that it is anti this LTN but not, necessarily all LTNs per se. But as it is One Dulwich is has not stated views about LTNs in general. In the main those prepared to make a view known, in Dulwich, have not supported the Council's LTN ambitions locally - whilst some, living in the LTN area, have gained personal benefit. But it would appear not even a majority of those living in the LTN area have supported the LTN. And certainly not those living immediately outside the area where traffic has worsened. As a resident of Underhill, a remaining access route to the South Circular, I can confirm that I am suffering increased traffic and blockages in rush hours whilst living some way away from the LTN. All this - 'I want to name the guilty parties' -' is One Dulwich a secret fascists cabal whose only interest is being anti-Labour?' conspiracy theorising is frankly irrelevant - whoever they are they seem to represent feelings of a majority of actual residents either in the LTNs, or in parts of Dulwich impacted by the LTNs. And I'm beginning to find these 'Answer me this...' tirades frankly irritating.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...