Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi I've read that some people have had problems at immigration, UK and abroad, when travelling with a child with a different surname.


My friend who works for Border Control said I should take a letter from my partner giving his permission for me to travel with my son, and a copy of his passport.


I just wondered how often people get questioned in reality, has anyone had experience?

I always have abcopy of the birth certificate in my wallet.

Isually l am too lazy to get it out of questioned, but l would not travel without it.

But l honestly think it is quiet discriminatory: we are married, just not having one family name and l have to prove constantly l have the right to travel with them.

I've taken my marriage certificate to show I'm married to someone with that surname, which has been accepted. I find it really irritating too - I look exactly like my children and our passport records show we have travelled repeatedly together. The idea that surname is so crucial grates.
Thanks all, looks like I had better take a copy of the birth certificate too as I am not married and my partner is not travelling with us. I would never have thought about it being an issue either but happened to read something about it and thought I'd better investigate, glad I did!

From a safeguarding POV I can completely see why this can be an issue - if some were happily ushered through it'd provide too big a loophole to be used by those trafficking children.


Know it sounds extreme, but it is a huge issue & thus there have to be procedures in place to protect children and unfortunately can't exclude the nice looking families.


I feel more angry that there are people so nasty as to traffic children/adults than the officials trying to prevent it.


Ironically, the old style thing where children were on their Mum's passport would've avoided this (although then create an issue for Dad's travelling solo with kids).


Am sure there are lots more occasions where Dads are vilified and eyed suspiciously when with their kids - how many of our other halfs have had occasions where they've had to "prove" their the parent/are acting with the Mum's consent?

Possibly this is where the notarised document comes into play.


However, one thing you can do is contact by email the embassy of the country that is being visited and ask what the situation is.


This is what we did for Greece and were advised about the notarised letter of consent.

I am always asked for the birth certificate when entering or exiting the "other" country. Wondering if UK border control has the parents' names logged when they scan the childrens' passports because they never ask me if they're mine when I leave the UK with them... (my passport is EU but non-UK and my kids' passports are British AND they have different surnames).
But devdev, that only works if you're in a 'custody battle' with someone with a different surname. If you're genuinely concerned that your ex will take the kids out of the country against your wishes for nefarious purposes, you need a prohibited steps order.
Simone, agreed. I think they can ask for a letter even if names are the same. I remember reading an article about a mother trying to get back her kids from Russia (she had actually sent them to visit their dad) and it referred to this. Our kids have both our names, but I travel with a letter and birth certificate.
I've travelled to Canada twice with my son without my husband and have had to have copies of my son's birth certificate, our marriage certificate (I haven't changed my passport to my married name yet), and a letter of consent from my husband. They are all checked carefully, but I've always wondered how they know it's authentic as I could've written the letter myself rather than my husband...
Me and my son have different surnames as well as different nationalities! We have travelled on our own without dad numerous times and I never got questioned. In any event I carry the birth certificate with me, but I don't have a letter of consent each time.

I have a different surname to my kids and they look nothing like me. I have travelled loads with them on my own and never once been asked. I've never thought of having to take proof but I will now.


to be honest it all seems a bit random. In many countries women do not change their name so they always have a different name to their children, who take the family name.

I don't think that a different name is considered strange at all. I think that they are even used to seeing parents traveling with kids of a different nationality. the question here is that they need to know that the other parent is aware that you are traveling with the kid or not.


So, even if your name is the same, you should have a letter of consent with you. notarised is the best, but within the EU we just do it with the signature of two witnesses. they don't usually ask for the paper, but in the rare chance that they do and you don't have it, it can be quite horrible. We started carrying it when we learned that when entering the US, a friend traveling alone with her small child was requested to prove that she is not abducting the kid, and until they could reach the father to verify, she was separated from her child. for over 7 hours. if you've ever been around American immigration officers, you know how horrific all this had been.


oh, and we do the same for when the grandparents travel with our kids.

btw, our children have both of our surnames, but right now their travel documents are of a different nationality from mine.


also, it's important to mention that women are much less questioned about this than men.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I'm a bit worried by your sudden involvement on this Forum.  The former Prince Andrew is now Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Mountbatten in an anglicisation of Von Battenburg adopted by that branch of our Royal Family in 1917 due to anti-German sentiment. Another anglicisation could be simply Battenburg as in the checker board cake.  So I surmise that your are Andrew Battenburg, aka Andrew Mountbatten Windsor and that you have infiltrated social media so that the country can put the emphasis on Mandelson ather than yourself.  Bit of a failure. I don't expect an answer from police custody.  
    • We had John fit our PLYKEA kitchen (IKEA cabinets with custom doors) and would happily recommend him and Gabi to anyone. Gabi handled all communication and was brilliant throughout — responsive and happy to answer questions however detailed. John is meticulous, cares about the small details, and was a pleasure to have in the house. The carpentry required for the custom doors was done to a high standard, and he even refinished the plumbing under the sink to sit better with the new cabinets — a small touch that made a real difference. They were happy to return and tie up a few things that couldn't be finished in the time, which we appreciated. No hesitations recommending them.
    • Not sure about that. Rockets seems to have (rightly in my view) identified two key motivating elements in Mcash's defection: anger at his previous (arguably shabby) treatment and a (linked) desire to trash the Labour party, nationally and locally. The defection, timed for maximum damage, combined with the invective and moral exhibitionism of his statement counts as rather more than a "hissy fit".  I would add a third motivation of political ambition: it's not inconceivable that he has his eye on the Dulwich & West Norwood seat which is predicted to go Green.  James Barber was indulging in typical LibDem sleight of hand, claiming that Blair introduced austerity to *councils* before the coalition. This is a kind of sixth form debating point. From 1997-1999 Labour broadly stuck to Tory spending totals, meaning there was limited growth in departmental spending, including local govt grants. However local government funding rose substantially in the Noughties, especially in education and social care. It is a matter of record that real-terms local authority spending increased in the Blair / Brown years overall. So he's manifestly wrong (or only right if the focus is on 1997-1999, which would be a bizarre focus and one he didn't include in his claim) but he wasn't claiming Blair introduced austerity more widely. 
    • My view is that any party that welcomes a self-declared Marxist would merit a negative point. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...