Jump to content

Recommended Posts

?It?s becoming a true, proactive virtual assistant. ? Once this capability is further refined and expanded, you can expect subtle nudges and reminders that guide you through your day.

?

Although a face recognition feature has been disabled and banned by Google for now, it?s likely that Glass will eventually tell you the name of people you encounter, and remind you about your personal history with that person


Is anyone in favour of this technology ?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/46545-google-glass/
Share on other sites

They say that anything invented before you were born is normal, from birth to 35 is exciting, and after that it's the end of civilisation as we know it. Right now I'm going with the last one, but realistically if it's anything like the internet the vast majority of what you see will be advertising or based on incorrect, unverified data. Wonder if the 'nudges and reminders' will be anything like that Office Assistant dog/paperclip thing.


Presumably when the wearer is checking data they lose eye contact with the person they're talking to and get a slightly glazed expression, not unlike a baby filling a nappy. Should make work meetings fun.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/46545-google-glass/#findComment-762755
Share on other sites

Samsung issuing a version in Autumn - a few more coming


It will be proper SciFi in a year or so - it really is the recognition that is the make and break - Needs to recognise and research everything the wearer looks at ;)


El Pibe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> this has been the stock-in-trade gimmick of near

> future sci-fi for about 50 years. Such things are

> an inevitablilty I'm afraid.

>

> It will eventually be less shit than google glass

> of course.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/46545-google-glass/#findComment-762777
Share on other sites

I can't help thinking that we need to get the basics sorted out first. Better mobile coverage in places like offices/shopping malls/airports/stations, more reliable mobile data, reasonably priced data useage overseas, etc. No point having a head mounted display if you have no internet connection half of the time.


It's like building a supercar when most of the roads are dirt tracks.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/46545-google-glass/#findComment-762791
Share on other sites

I expect a rise in Glass-wearing pedestrian accidents as people walk into traffic whilst watching kittens play trumpets and mouthing the word 'Lol' into their voice-recognition handy-mic.


Only a rise in white-painted Google-Glas replicas tied to railings and lampposts at the sites will raise awareness of this side effect.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/46545-google-glass/#findComment-762824
Share on other sites

It tells you exactly what to do of course :)


One day we won't be able to take them off .... ever.


edit: thinking again this was the plot of the cybermen.


rahrahrah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm not sure what problem Google Glass is trying

> to solve. Seems to just be another piece of

> expensive kit I really don't need, but will

> inevitably end up wanting despite of myself. I

> resent it.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/46545-google-glass/#findComment-762889
Share on other sites

Inventors. Innovators. Designers


Loving your work. Some is good some isn't


But


Battery. Focus on that. We use these things all the time now. THats not your fault and it says more about us than you.


But "fix" current battery technology. Do that and everyone will be truly happy with their device of choice


(Google glass has shit battery life, looks awful and is invasive. Those things may all change over time)

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/46545-google-glass/#findComment-762963
Share on other sites

Presumably Google Glass makes you and your behaviour more trackable as it's (in theory anyway) the big step forward from Google knowing what you're thinking about, as it does already if you use it to search online, to knowing what you're looking at and influencing how you construct meaning based on that, with all the enhanced advertising potential that offers. We're all going to hell in a handcart, frankly.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/46545-google-glass/#findComment-762992
Share on other sites

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Battery.


Yeah I'll add that to my list of "basics we need to sort out first". When a smartphone - almost any smartphone - struggles to last from morning to night with moderate usage, there's surely still some way to go. Walk before you run.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/46545-google-glass/#findComment-763025
Share on other sites

read an article that, rather stating the obvious, moore's law doesn't apply to batteries.

So we have a choice of functionality and speed versus life.


in reality we'll just be surrounded by more wireless, solar, cycling, walking sources of charging in a desperate bid to squeeze a few more seconds of life.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/46545-google-glass/#findComment-763028
Share on other sites

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> StraferJack Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Battery.

>

> Yeah I'll add that to my list of "basics we need

> to sort out first". When a smartphone - almost any

> smartphone - struggles to last from morning to

> night with moderate usage, there's surely still

> some way to go. Walk before you run.


Yup, I'm sure that's the exact logic that inspired steve Job and anyother visionary nerd you could name.*


*I hope the sarcasm dripped out*


Let's get this pushing thing mastered before we think about those round wheely things

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/46545-google-glass/#findComment-763129
Share on other sites

wondered when this topic would crop up again, bbw beat you to it MM. http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?20,1086996,1086996#msg-1086996


and battery technology and energy storage have been at the forefront of most top research institutes for the last decade or more. I don't think we realise how far we have come, not saying we are 'there' yet.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/46545-google-glass/#findComment-764837
Share on other sites

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> pretty sure a large part of the last many decades

> of aviation and motoring has been driven by fuel

> efficiencies as much as feature sets



But would be the classic thing to outsource


and maybe apple have :)


http://www.cultofmac.com/287321/fuel-cell-iphone-batteries/

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/46545-google-glass/#findComment-764944
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I mean I hold no portfolio to defend Gala,  but I suspect that is their office.  I am a company director,  my home address is also not registered with Companies House. Also guys this is Peckham not Royston Vasey.  Shoreditch is a mere 20 mins away by train, it's not an offshore bolt hole in Luxembourg.
    • While it is good that GALA have withdrawn their application for a second weekend, local people and councillors will likely have the same fight on their hands for next year's event. In reading the consultation report, I noted the Council were putting the GALA event in the same light as all the other events that use the park, like the Circus, the Fair and even the FOPR fete. ALL of those events use the common, not the park, and cause nothing like the level of noise and/or disruption of the GALA event. Even the two day Irish Festival (for those that remember that one) was never as noisy as GALA. So there is some disingenuity and hypocrisy from the Council on this, something I wll point out in my response to the report. The other point to note was that in past years branches were cut back for the fencing. Last year the council promised no trees would be cut after pushback, but they seem to now be reverting to a position of 'only in agreement with the council's arbourist'. Is this more hypocrisy from 'green' Southwark who seem to once again be ok with defacing trees for a fence that is up for just days? The people who now own GALA don't live in this area. GALA as an event began in Brockwell Park. It then lost its place there to bigger events (that pesumably could pay Lambeth Council more). One of the then company directors lived on the Rye Hill Estate next to the park and that is likely how Peckham Rye came to be the new choice for the event. That person is no longer involved. Today's GALA company is not the same as the 'We Are the Fair' company that held that first event, not the same in scope, aim or culture. And therein lies the problem. It's not a local community led enterprise, but a commercial one, underwritten by a venture capital company. The same company co-run the Rally Event each year in Southwark Park, which btw is licensed as a one day event only. That does seem to be truer to the original 'We Are the Fair' vision, but how much of that is down to GALA as opoosed to 'Bird on the Wire' (the other group organising it) is hard to say.  For local people, it's three days of not being able to open windows, As someone said above, if a resident set up a PA in their back garden and subjected the neighbours to 10 hours of hard dance music every day for three days, the Council would take action. Do not underestimate how distressing that is for many local residents, many of whom are elderly, frail, young, vulnerable. They deserve more respect than is being shown by those who think it's no big deal. And just to be clear, GALA and the council do not consider there to be a breach of db level if the level is corrected within 15 minutes of the breach. In other words, while db levels are set as part of the noise management plan, there is an acknowledgement that a breach is ok if corrected within 15 minutes. That is just not good enough. Local councillors objected to the proposed extension. 75% of those that responded to the consultation locally did not want GALA 26 to take place at all. For me personally, any goodwill that had been built up through the various consultations over recent years was erased with that application for a second weekend, and especially given that when asked if there were plans for that in post 2025 event feedback meetings (following rumours), GALA lied and said there were no plans to expand. I have come to the conclusion that all the effort to appease on some things is merely an exercise in show, to get past the council's threshold for the events licence. They couldn't give a hoot in reality for local people, and people that genuinely care about parkland, don't litter it with noisy festivals either.   
    • Aria is my go to plumber. Fixed a toilet leak for me at short notice. Reasonably priced and very professional. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...