Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I have it on good authority that an invisible force field was erected around 'The Village' to protect Gails from the looters who were after their carrot cake. Luckily this important local treasure was saved for the masses who save up for weeks to indulge in such delicious treats once in a blue moon, savouring every crumb and feasting on the memory of every morsel rather than gorging on inferior goods more often in joyless consumerism.

Except Gail's wasn't there then.


sydenhamcentral Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I have it on good authority that an invisible

> force field was erected around 'The Village' to

> protect Gails from the looters who were after

> their carrot cake. Luckily this important local

> treasure was saved for the masses who save up for

> weeks to indulge in such delicious treats once in

> a blue moon, savouring every crumb and feasting on

> the memory of every morsel rather than gorging on

> inferior goods more often in joyless consumerism.

DulwichVillageLady Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This thread got me a ban from the main East

> Dulwich board. Do you all harber resentment from

> not buying in the more affluent area. Average

> house price in DV is 1.5 mil.


wen did this thred got u ban from EDF?

Robert Poste's Child Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Except Gail's wasn't there then.

>

Well, that's that theory kicked into touch.


The carrot cake is good though. I'm about to take out a second mortgage to get another one soon.

I suppose, drawing positives. On the assumption that this is a pseudonym for a person who is still in the developmental stage for literacy skills. We should praise their willingness to put their fledgling skills in the public domain; like a small child playing its first public piano recital.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • These statements were in the Consultation Findings report published (later than promised) just before the licence was granted:  "The site hire fee goes directly to supporting the delivery of the council’s Events service, which supports the delivery of up to 100 free-to-attend community events per year – please refer to section 1 (Licensing and income)" I've drafted an email to request some more details of these "free-to-attend" events, as "up to" is a fairly meaningless description - could be 100, could be none? - and therefore doesn't help anyone to decide whether it is actually a benefit to the community or not. Even if it is 100, I'm not sure I could name even one of them? "The site hire fee goes directly to supporting the provision of a grants fund – the Cultural Celebrations programme - please refer to section 1 (Licensing and income)" A similarly meaningless statement in terms of gauging whether, or how much, this is a benefit to the local community. What is it, what does it do, how much of the fee goes to it? And how can the fee go "directly" to two different things? Surely, "directly" means without deviation, straight to, without being changed or reduced?? Again, I'll be asking all these questions to the events dept. I find it outrageous & insulting that a public body can try to justify such an intrusive & disruptive event with such flimsy and opaque "benefits", with zero figures or details to quantify them. They may as well not bother with a consultation, just say "Look, we can't be arsed to justify our decision, it's happening so just deal with it".  
    • Thanks so much. Yes I have. Really appreciate your kindness in replying. Thank you.
    • Have you posted on Nextdoor? There's a big cat community on there. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...