Jump to content

Recommended Posts

"I don't believe anyone has a problem for them to hang around at a playground if that is what they want to - so long as they respect other adults and children using that public space."


exactly.



Good post bd.

One small thing I will say in their defence, is when confronted by an adult following a fight in front of young children, they did (albeit after a few minutes and rather sullenly) move off. Twice now though I have seen them having proper fights (punches to the face etc.), accompanied by the kind of 'fck him up' type commentary, which is just totally inappropriate in a children's playground. As said above, if they were just hanging out there causing no trouble that would be one thing (alhtough I still don't think it's a particularly appropriate place to do so), but violence and agression are not. It doesn't help anyone (least of all the teenagers themselves) to make excuses for their bad behaviour.

I know the group you mean and though most of them seem fine and they just hang around quietly chatting (sort of) I did have to confront three of them recently for really obscene conversation they were having right next to me while I pushed my 3-year-old son on the large, round swing.

Two boys were having sexually explicit conversations with, or rather AT, one of the girls and trying to encourage her to say stuff about blow jobs and similar to them. I was fuming! I'm no prude, but clearly I don't want my son to hear that. Also, I was just really uspet that these boys were speaking like that to her. I hope it's not something she has to put up with a lot and I hope they grow out of their adolescent behaviour towards women. There was something very persistent as they nagged at her to say the words they wanted her to. Anyway I asked them to move if they wanted to talk like that and they ignored me. I asked again, more sternly two mins later and they sloped off. I must add though that I hung around in parks/playgrounds as a teen and this is just what they do. It's the same everywhere of course and I'm not even entirely sure that extra stuff for them to do would keep them away anyway. They don't always want organised, essentially adult led activity or spaces, they simply want to do their own thing.

How are they thugs? You guys are lame. I was a youth worker for years and kids this age will test how far they can push adults. It's universal, they all do (with the exception of those of you who were born middle aged).


I personally would have told them they were disrespectful little shits myself but the hysteria on here over a bunch of idiot teenagers is laughable.

LadyD - I couldn't disagree more. There is no hysteria, people are simply voicing their reasonable disapproval at teenagers / young adults fighting and swearing in an area full of toddlers / young children. It is quite scary for a 3 year old to witness a group of 7-8 young men fighting and swearing. Sure, adolescents will do this stuff, but the issue is the setting in which they're doing it. I have spoken to them myself in the past as it happens, but that's not the point. The point is, they shouldn't be regularly hanging around in the playground. Why don't they cross the road to Goose Green? Suggesting that people are being hysterical or implying that they are up tight, simply for disapproving is just excusing bad behaviour and is unhelpful.

For once i agree with rahrah, its unacceptable and no-one should stand for it...


I once recall the same thing happening when i was a kid and my old man dragging the culprit by the scruff of the neck to his parents house to give them a piece of his mind!.....the good old days eh!.

What hysteria?


And really there's no need to say that you'd have given them a piece of your mind. We're all well aware of what a brave, ne'er a step back, citizen you are.



LadyDeliah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> How are they thugs? You guys are lame. I was a

> youth worker for years and kids this age will test

> how far they can push adults. It's universal, they

> all do (with the exception of those of you who

> were born middle aged).

>

> I personally would have told them they were

> disrespectful little shits myself but the hysteria

> on here over a bunch of idiot teenagers is

> laughable.

I'd tell them that your mate was a member of the Richardson gang who was renowned for his use of dentistry without anaesthetic and that he's looking for new "work" to perform. That might do the trick.
Could someone just please pick up a phone and do something? It's unacceptable for teens to be invading a parent/young children's space and more so when they make the people for whose use the park is designed feel frightened or uncomfortable. Call 101 or ring 7525 2000 and report this anti-social behaviour and ask other disgruntled park users to do the same.

Q: When does sympathy for 'bored' teenagers turn to frustration?


A: When they are rude, abusive or bullying anyone around that takes their fancy, even their own, which it sounds like from their in-fighting and the boys forcing the girls to say sexually explicit or other things they don't want to say.


It is all unacceptable.


Teenagers can be bored and appear quite loud when bantering in groups but most know to moderate their language when close to others not in their group and go out of their way not to be rude or offensive.


Much of the behaviour attributed to the particular group in this thread is unacceptable in any setting.

I agree robbin. All the wishy washy hug a hoody brigade out and about on the forum making up excuses. Where's the plastic coppers when needed? Isn't this what they hold be dealing with? Just need to go in there and tell them to p*ss off or they'll be charged with anti social behaviour in a public place.


Louisa.

The "plastic coppers" used to be out in force, nearly always walking in threes, but I've not seen any for at least four months on the streets of SE22/15. Also, the Southwark-branded "community whatsits" are no longer to be seen (not that I had much faith in them anyway to do much more than hog the pavement). If anyone who is one, or is responsible for one, is reading this, do try to solve the problem.

Nigello Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The "plastic coppers" used to be out in force,

> nearly always walking in threes, but I've not seen

> any for at least four months on the streets of

> SE22/15. Also, the Southwark-branded "community

> whatsits" are no longer to be seen (not that I had

> much faith in them anyway to do much more than hog

> the pavement). If anyone who is one, or is

> responsible for one, is reading this, do try to

> solve the problem.


I've seen lone police-officers walking the streets of SE22 on a few occasions in the past few months and had a lovely chat with one the other night.

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I agree robbin. All the wishy washy hug a hoody

> brigade out and about on the forum making up

> excuses. Where's the plastic coppers when needed?

> Isn't this what they hold be dealing with? Just

> need to go in there and tell them to p*ss off or

> they'll be charged with anti social behaviour in a

> public place.

>

> Louisa.


Very True...


Too many do-gooders.


Kids steal cars and get rewarded by being sent on car maintenance courses.


Good kids get nothing. Good kids get bored too.


Try telling someone whose Mum or Grandma has just had her bag snatched and knocked about a bit.

the lad did it was 'Not a bad lad' . 'he's had a hard life'


I don't care.


They are bad machines..


You cannot keep mending a bad machine.

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Louisa Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I agree robbin. All the wishy washy hug a hoody

> > brigade out and about on the forum making up

> > excuses. Where's the plastic coppers when

> needed?

> > Isn't this what they hold be dealing with? Just

> > need to go in there and tell them to p*ss off

> or

> > they'll be charged with anti social behaviour in

> a

> > public place.

> >

> > Louisa.

>

> Very True...

>

> Too many do-gooders.

>

> Kids steal cars and get rewarded by being sent on

> car maintenance courses.

>

> Good kids get nothing. Good kids get bored too.

>

> Try telling someone whose Mum or Grandma has just

> had her bag snatched and knocked about a bit.

> the lad did it was 'Not a bad lad' . 'he's had a

> hard life'

>

> I don't care.

>

> They are bad machines..

>

> You cannot keep mending a bad machine.



What is the ethnic background to these unruly kids ?


What is done I am sure will relate to this

spider69 Wrote:

>

> What is the ethnic background to these unruly kids


> What is done I am sure will relate to this


I have no idea. I have never seen the mentioned group.

Why does the ethnic background matter. ?


What does 'What is done I am sure will relate to this' mean?


DulwichFox

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • But at the same time those she sought for advice told her, very clearly, she needed to seek specialist advice which she did not do and carried on regardless. So I think the jury is out on whether this was a legitimate mistake or not.
    • Thanks @Sephiroth I was thinking along the same lines (demonisation of Rayner by the media) and came across this article yesterday from Manchester Evening News.  It doesn't excuse her, but the title "Angela Rayner's real offence was being a working class woman in power" is self explanatory. https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/angela-rayners-real-offence-being-32422596 The crossing legs nonsense is particularly telling.
    • Given her role, she pretty much had to go. I don't think she is an avid tax-schemer who deliberately set out to avoid tax - I do pretty much believe her story of multiple high-profile roles and looking after a child with needs. But many regular voters juggle demanding jobs and families and are afforded no leeway by taxman, so she totally should have known better But here we are - she was found to be negligent and now she has suffered teh consequence. To me that its the OPPOSITE of all parties/politicians as generally the ignore the whole thing (today we have Tice saying Farage's tax affairs are of no interest to voters for example) And it would be poor form to not acknowledge why she was targeted quite so viciously - we even have posters on here here saying "when I saw her taping on a boat that was the  end for me" - like the end of what?. Her gender and class were clear motivators for many people. Two wrongs don't make a right - but it';s interesting to see some posters on here give so many others a blank cheque. Many are planning to vote for Farage despite his dishonesty being 100x worse than Rayner PS - I don't think she will join Corbyn party - unlike him she is smart and unlike him she recognises that being In power means you can at least stand a chance of delivering results This. The Greens will have a rise in the polls on back of new leader but that is one hell of a coalition of NIMBY/YIMBYs As what would Reform do if in government to help with... well, anything?   Labour can at least point to decreasing waiting lists, lower immigration numbers, not having a different PM every 6 months - not that anyone is listening
    • So what do people want?  More housing.  More affordable housing.  But not in my back yard. That applies to urban areas too.  Easy to criticise, but where are your answers?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...