Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Yep, 1984, one of those books that changed my life. Wonderful, but I can understand that there are patches where the plot, such as it is, doesn't exactly race along.


As opposed to 1421, some rubbish conjecture about how a Chinese boat circumnavigated the world, discovered America, invented farming, antibiotics, pasteurisation and split the atom. Hmmm.

Like I say, it says a lot, and it is an important book. But I just didn't exactly find it to be a page turner. I was 15/16 when I read it though, problem with having to do books for English exams, kind of takes the pleasure out of them... Although I did like Lord of the flies. :-S

Keef Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> 1984 is a book that I found to be very hard work.

> Obviously it has a lot to say, and it's well

> written and all that, but frankly it bored me.


Me too. it's one of the few books I've started and not got beyond the first few chapters. Mind you it was over 20 years ago I tried (during english lit GCSE)


The other one that really defeated me was by Kazuo Ishiguro - the guy who wrote The Remains of the Day which I liked, but his next book, The Unconsoled was dreadful - like having a confusing dream, which to be fair I think it was meant to be, but it was torture nonetheless.


I can remember trying to read The Silmarilion when I was a kid, but it didn't hook me, loved Hobbit and LOTR though.


Oh and agree on Wuthering Heights too - I was so disappointed - was meant to be some great romance, and you open the book up and discover one of them is already dead, and it becomes clear quickly neither of them are very nice people either. All too turgid for my liking, same as the rest of the miserable Bronte sisters output. Stick to Jane Austen, much more enjoyable.


I did manage to finish the Da Vinci Code, but I refused to buy a new copy, just got a tatty one from a charity shop, and it was as bad a pot boiler as I expected it to be, went straight back in the charity shop afterwards.


Can add Dickens to the mix too - one writer who is better on TV / film - the plots are good enough and watching cuts out all his waffle - was he paid by the word or something.... yawn. Though again, I last tried to read him 20 years ago... might appreciate it now.

I know Tillie. Everyone I know who read it liked it which is why I persevered and actually read the whole thing. I normally just put a book down if it is boring me but with Life of Pi I thought I must be missing something and it would get better.


It didn?t and I felt left out of the Life of Pi club.


What I tend to like in books is the deconstruction of established ideas to expose the entropy in the world around us or stupid humour. Preferably stupid humour that deconstructs established ideas to expose the entropy in the world around us.

Normally I enjoy Mike Gayle's books, just because they're nice easy reading, but he writes very realistic characters I think. Anyway, the first one was called "My Legendary Girlfriend". Fortunately this was not the first one I read, because if it had been, I am pretty sure I never would have read another one. So slow, and so so depressing!

May be being unfair here, but just couldn't (despite really trying) finish Microserfs by Douglas Coupland. Think it would have been much more fun for someone in their 20s in 90-95, if read at that time, but it definitely hasn't aged well, and is just too full of nerdspeak for my brain!


Hmmm, I think I may have written that on this forum before ages ago... Oh well.

the unholy trinity of shit filled reading slop:


Parsons

Pearson

Proulx


I have to admit that Proulx can write, its just shes forgotten that a plot would help a bit


On the Parsons theme, I have a soft spot for Burchill - a vitriol pissing hag of dubious politics, but she does rant very well


Pearson should be drowned in a bucket of her own urine, though I " dont know now she does it"


Go to the Mind shop and see whats racking up - what is Todays equiavelent of the Herriot & Maclean donations of yesteryear ?


Beckham Biographies, Public school Potter, anything with txt language as its USP ( LOLS GR8 etc ), Bloody Dan Brown, Crap with comic sans on its cover ,Pointless drivel by Paul Cohelo


Theres too much to list innit

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Bunty Annual.


Are you sure? If it featured any adventures of The Four Marys, then have a care, for you toy with my juvenile sexuality.

Which Mary? Cotter? Raleigh? I couldn't make my mind up.

Probably bacause on the back cover of each 'Bunty' there was Bunty, disporting herself in her underwear.

Distracting me from the wholesomeness of the the Marys, and enticing me into the whole 'cutting out the Bunty figure, the clothes, ensuring you include the 'tabs' so that you can press them over Bunty's compliant body'

Think again, Sue.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I’m not a Gail’s fan but there’s no reason a business shouldn’t open on Christmas Day. However, nobody should be compelled to work the day which, given the widespread coverage of Gail’s questionable employment practices, has to be a possibility here.  The only business I ever use on the 25th is maybe a pub and that’s a rarity these days but buses running would be very welcome for visiting etc. But the swings in the park should definitely remain chained up. Are parks even open on Christmas Day?
    • To be honest, pal, it's not good being a fan of a local business and then not go there. One on hand, the barber shop literally next door to Romeo Jones started serving coffee. The Crown and Greyhound and Rocca serve coffee. Redemption Coffee opened up not far away, and then also Megan's next door to that. DVillage was serving coffee (but wasn't very popular), as was Au Ciel (which is). Maybe also Heritage Cheese, I don't know. There's also Flotsam and Jetsam doing coffee and sandwiches at Dulwich Picture Gallery in the other direction. The whole of Dulwich Village serves coffee. And yet on the other hand, there are enough punters to support all good coffee shops. With the exception of Rocca and Megan's (which are both big spaces) and C&G (which does coffee like everything else - slow and with bad service), all these places regularly get queues out the door. Gail's often has big queues and yet very few people crossed the street to Romeo Jones (which was much better)... Half the staff at Gail's are perfectly fine and efficient. The other half are pretty offhand and rude. It's certainly not welcoming or friendly service. But they're certainly hard working, and no doubt raking the money in for Luke Johnson...
    • Well according to a newspaper article, Gail’s is opening 10 shops in London,,, yup Dulwich is named 10/5 I seem to recall with others in London opening at 7 am…!, Guess that is to capture workers coming off all night shift. Offering free mince pies until they run out.. So very sad to hear about Romeo Jones… been a customer since the opening, any idea where Patrick has gone or details… please pm me.    What is going to be in its place…. Will be around in Jan…umm village is changing….
    • interesting the police said "the car was in demand at the moment" what make/model is that?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...