Jump to content

Recommended Posts

You've got to be kidding, BN5. Sophomoric at best.


No kidding.

I was just a teenager when I first read it and I loved it then - to my 'burban 14 y.o self it was a world away. Now it is very comforting to re-read. It's never occurred to me that others might find it pants.


S'pose that raises the point that the right book at the right time can be great without really being a great book, if you see what I mean...


(But you can still bugger off cos i love it. It doesn't all have to be about the beauty of the writing and the wonder of the human spirit ;-) )

OK, I ditched that post in the hope that you wouldn't have read it because it was a bit rude and unpleasant. So well done for reading it in the spirit I did mean it in! Bless you, dear heart.


However, in re: "It doesn't all have to be about the beauty of the writing and the wonder of the human spirit"


YES IT BURBLYFUCKING DOES.


Merry Christmas. Mwah.

??the beauty of the writing and the wonder of the human spirit?


Did you embroider that on a throw cushion?


How about, the absurdity of existence and the slapstick nature of human endeavour.


(I?m so cool I scrawled that in Gauloise on the back of a dog eared copy of On the Road.)


Oh by the way, On the Road? Rubbish! As a student I tried to use it as a prop to pull ?interesting? girls and it failed every time.


Sorry wrong thread.

*throws cushion*


Yeah, I know, was kind of a pretentious thing to say - I was just thinking about the book and how amazing it is, and got carried away. I do think that good books should be about what it means to be human, and how we live, and obviously that can be squalid and dull and confusing and terrifying as much as it can be uplifting and inspiring.

Yes, definitely. Would be a bit weird (and too serious) if reading were all about the Big Themes, we'd all get fed up pretty quickly. I suppose I was thinking of great books - but this thread is for 'good' books, isn't it?


*goes off in search of sense of humour*


Ah, that's where I left it!

Personally I like novels to be heavy on the rude jokes with a sprinkle of nonsense poetry. I realise that the immortal greats like Dostoyevsky, Tolstoy and Rowling do not employ these methods but Shakespeare did. The only reason he didn?t also write novels was because they hadn?t really been invented yet and most of his target audience probably couldn?t read.

Often really funny writing is also quite sad, is it not? Thinking of the excruciating scenes where Malvolio gets humiliated in 12th Night, for example (btw, apparently Derek Jacobi is currently searingly good in the part at the Wyndham's).


Besides, when did we excise having a sense of humour or being funny from being part of what it's like to be a person? BN5 just said that a book could be good and funny without being great. It can also be funny and great.


Edited for clarity and spellingk.

apparently Derek Jacobi is currently searingly good in the part at the Wyndham's


We're hoping to get to see him, rewatched I Claudius from start to finish recently, think he's great!


As for what makes a good book, writing is an art form, and like any art form, beauty is in the eye / ear of the beholder. For me, a book is special if it makes me smile, makes me shed a tear, or makes me really think about the world. I don't personally care about the grammar or word play, what works for me won't work for others though.


For people to dismiss any book is like the string quartet "Bond" being shunned by the classical Brits a few years ago for being a "pop act", simply because of snobbery, and the fact that they would have blown everyone else out of the water!


Note, I am not a Bond fan, but they were talented musicians.

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The decision to leave the EU was a poor one, but I'd avoid the term stupid when applied to the masses (the decision was of course stupid) and blame those who willingly misled.  A certain N Farage (pronounced with a hard G rather than the soft G he affected, rather continental eh?) being one of the main culprits. He blames the Tories for not delivering Brexit, and not really clear how Labour are playing this.  But ultimately what sort of Brexit were people voting for?  And ditto what future were people voting for last Thursday?
    • "That’s very insulting! You are basically calling 17 million people that voted to leave the EU ‘thick’. " I'm certainly calling them wrong. And many of those 17 million agree with me now and have expressed regret. Many others were indeed thick, and remain so. You can see them being interviewed all the time. As for insulting, the losing side in that referendum have being called every name under the sun "enemies of the people" etc etc - so spare me the tears about being insulted But for clarity. there is a certain type of individual who even now thinks Brexit was a good idea, tends to side with Trump and holds views about immigrants - and yes I am happy to calll those people thick. - and even worse Jazzer posts a long and sometimes correct post about the failings of modern parties. I myself think labour are woefully underperforming. But equally it has been less than a year after 14 years of mismanagement and despite some significant errors have largely steadied the ship. You only have to speak to other  countries to recognise the improvement there. They have cut NHS waiting times, and the upside of things like NI increases is higher minimum wage - something hard-bitten voters should appreciate. They were accused of being too gloomy when they came in and yet simultaneously people are accusing them of promising the earth and failing to deliver - both of those can't be true at the same time Fact is, this country repeatedly, over 15 years, voted for austerity and self-damaging policies like Brexit despite all warnings - this newish govt now have to pick up the pieces and there are no easy solutions. Voters say "we just want honest politicians" - ok, we have some bad news about the economy and the next few years  - "no no not that kind of honesty!!! - magic some solutions up now!" Anyone who considers voting for Reform because they don't represent existing parties and want "change" is being criminally negligent in ignoring their dog-whistles, their lack of diligence in vetting, their lack of attendance (in Westminster now and in eu parties is guises past) and basically making all of the same mistakes when they pushed for Brexit - basically, not serious people   "cost of things in the shops and utility bills keep on rising, the direct opposite of what they promised." - can we see that promise? I don't recall it? Because whatever voters or govts want, the cost of things is not exactly entirely in their gift. People were warned prices would rise with Brexit and e were told "we don't care - it's a price worth paying!". Turns out that isn' really true now is it - people DO care about the cost of things (and of course there are other factors - covid, trump, tariffs, wars etc.    What the country needs is a serious, mature electorate who take a high level view of priorities and get behind the hard work needed to achieve that. There is zero chance of that happening so we are doomed to repeat failures for years to come, complaining about everything and voting for policies which will make things worse here we have labour 2024 energy manifesto commitments - all of it necessary long term investment - calling for immediate price cuts with no money in the kitty seems unrealistic given all of the economic headwinds   https://www.energy-uk.org.uk/general-election-2024-all-manifesto-energy-pledges/#Labour_Party
    • Regardless of “Blighty” it’s the combination of “we” “R” and “Blighty” we means there is a them  cancerian may or may not recognise a dog whistle.  If he doesn’t, we are trying to point one out.  If he does then they are trying to gaslight us into pretending they are just a lovely fundraising group with no agenda 
    • I’m on Darrell Road and have noticed this recently - your daughters are not alone! It seems to only be at night. Would you agree? High pitched and consistent. I’ve been wondering if it’s a street lamp, or a fox deterrent system.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...