Jump to content

Recommended Posts

You've got to be kidding, BN5. Sophomoric at best.


No kidding.

I was just a teenager when I first read it and I loved it then - to my 'burban 14 y.o self it was a world away. Now it is very comforting to re-read. It's never occurred to me that others might find it pants.


S'pose that raises the point that the right book at the right time can be great without really being a great book, if you see what I mean...


(But you can still bugger off cos i love it. It doesn't all have to be about the beauty of the writing and the wonder of the human spirit ;-) )

OK, I ditched that post in the hope that you wouldn't have read it because it was a bit rude and unpleasant. So well done for reading it in the spirit I did mean it in! Bless you, dear heart.


However, in re: "It doesn't all have to be about the beauty of the writing and the wonder of the human spirit"


YES IT BURBLYFUCKING DOES.


Merry Christmas. Mwah.

??the beauty of the writing and the wonder of the human spirit?


Did you embroider that on a throw cushion?


How about, the absurdity of existence and the slapstick nature of human endeavour.


(I?m so cool I scrawled that in Gauloise on the back of a dog eared copy of On the Road.)


Oh by the way, On the Road? Rubbish! As a student I tried to use it as a prop to pull ?interesting? girls and it failed every time.


Sorry wrong thread.

*throws cushion*


Yeah, I know, was kind of a pretentious thing to say - I was just thinking about the book and how amazing it is, and got carried away. I do think that good books should be about what it means to be human, and how we live, and obviously that can be squalid and dull and confusing and terrifying as much as it can be uplifting and inspiring.

Yes, definitely. Would be a bit weird (and too serious) if reading were all about the Big Themes, we'd all get fed up pretty quickly. I suppose I was thinking of great books - but this thread is for 'good' books, isn't it?


*goes off in search of sense of humour*


Ah, that's where I left it!

Personally I like novels to be heavy on the rude jokes with a sprinkle of nonsense poetry. I realise that the immortal greats like Dostoyevsky, Tolstoy and Rowling do not employ these methods but Shakespeare did. The only reason he didn?t also write novels was because they hadn?t really been invented yet and most of his target audience probably couldn?t read.

Often really funny writing is also quite sad, is it not? Thinking of the excruciating scenes where Malvolio gets humiliated in 12th Night, for example (btw, apparently Derek Jacobi is currently searingly good in the part at the Wyndham's).


Besides, when did we excise having a sense of humour or being funny from being part of what it's like to be a person? BN5 just said that a book could be good and funny without being great. It can also be funny and great.


Edited for clarity and spellingk.

apparently Derek Jacobi is currently searingly good in the part at the Wyndham's


We're hoping to get to see him, rewatched I Claudius from start to finish recently, think he's great!


As for what makes a good book, writing is an art form, and like any art form, beauty is in the eye / ear of the beholder. For me, a book is special if it makes me smile, makes me shed a tear, or makes me really think about the world. I don't personally care about the grammar or word play, what works for me won't work for others though.


For people to dismiss any book is like the string quartet "Bond" being shunned by the classical Brits a few years ago for being a "pop act", simply because of snobbery, and the fact that they would have blown everyone else out of the water!


Note, I am not a Bond fan, but they were talented musicians.

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • It's regrettable that impact of the various topics of immigration have escalated to the level that people have to protest their unhappiness and that laws have to be rewritten, and yet people complain that those protesting are racist.       
    • I remember in the 70s the Union Jack was similarly appropriated by the National Front and later the British Party, I regarded it in the same way many perceive the St George's flag today. The Union Jack went through a period of rehabilitation in the 90s and probably viewed more positively by the left today. I wonder though if the anti immigration groups who have appropriated the St George;s flag realise that St George was born in what is modern day Turkey.
    • Certainly there are issues with  immigration which need to be addressed, but setting fire to buildings with immigrants in them is not the way to address them. Many (not all) of these people are fleeing from terrible situations in their own countries, and I can't even imagine what it must be like to finally reach somewhere where they hope they will be safe only to be "greeted" with violence and hostility. It makes me ashamed to be English, not proud. And yes, some of these people are here illegally, some of them are criminals or perpetrate attacks on women or whatever. And are dealt with accordingly. I read recently, and I don't know if it is true, that over 60% of the men arrested at the scene of attacks on immigrants and their temporary homes have previous convictions for  or are known to the police for domestic violence. Maybe look at yourselves first, eh, before trying to imply that because a few  immigrants commit a crime here therefore they are all criminals and shouldn't be allowed into our country. Why would someone fly the English flag in the present climate for any reason apart from being anti immigration?  What is a very unhealthy view? Are you replying to me? Yes the immigration law badly needs to be amended. I completely agree. I don't think I've said anything which implies otherwise?
    • That’s a very unhealthy view.  Particularly when the very top echelons admit that the immigration law is out of date and not relevant and is being amended as we speak.    
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...